Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Republican Party

Republicans Hammer Biden on Inflation. But Do They Have a Better Plan?

Opening night of the Republican National Convention programmed a central issue with a Trumpian twist: "Make America Wealthy Again."

Billy Binion | 7.16.2024 12:34 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Donald Trump with a bandage on his ear in front of a sign reading 'America' at the Republican National Convention | MATT MARTIN/UPI/Newscom
Former President Donald Trump is seen at the Republican National Convention on Monday (MATT MARTIN/UPI/Newscom)

The Republican National Convention (RNC) kicked off on Monday with a song as old as time: "It's the economy, stupid."

That quote, which traces back to the early 1990s, came from Democratic strategist James Carville, an adviser on Bill Clinton's first presidential campaign. But in a testament to the staying power of that message, and its resonance across political parties, it reappeared tonight in MAGA form: "Make America Wealthy Again."

A noble goal. Can the Republican Party deliver?

It would be hard to answer that based on Monday's program alone, which—as is typical for national political conventions—focused more on platitudes than policy prescriptions.

Much was made on opening night about increased grocery and gas prices. President Joe Biden too often chalks those problems up to "corporate greed"—an allegation he recycled again during his highly anticipated press conference last week. (Which raises the question: Were grocery store owners just feeling charitable until they recently got greedy?) 

A more realistic villain is inflation. But it is doubtful that another term with President Trump—or any president, really—would be the antidote. 

That's because inflation, like most issues, is complex and multifaceted, and can't be solved or blamed on one singular person, no matter how convenient that might be on a convention floor.

Trump added about $8 trillion to the debt over his tenure, and Biden quickly followed that up with a $1.9 trillion stimulus package. Neither spending spree helped. But there were many other factors as well, including a global pandemic and volatile energy markets due to international conflict.

Trump offers some deflationary policies within his deregulatory agenda, which could increase supply and lower prices of key goods. That's nice. But other parts of the GOP's Trump-inspired platform resemble the protectionist policies that would have once been more at home in the Democratic Party. That they've been wrapped up in nationalist conservative branding does not change the results.

Consider Trump's affection for tariffs, for example, which raise prices on manufacturing inputs, and thus raise actual prices for consumers. J.D. Vance, Trump's newly minted vice presidential pick, does not necessarily allay these fears, as Vance's comparative advantage for the ticket, per Trump, is his protectionist appeal to blue-collar workers in swing states.

What went unmentioned tonight is maybe more instructive for sussing out how a second Trump term would tackle government spending, and by extension, inflation. It is unpopular these days, for instance, for Republicans to be the adults in the room on Social Security and Medicare reform, despite that the former is racing toward insolvency.

"Failure to act will result in a fiscal scenario where Republicans will be left with little leverage as Democrats push through their preferred 'solutions,'" writes Reason contributor editor Veronique de Rugy. "The resulting higher taxes and increased debt will have far-reaching unhealthy consequences for the economy and future generations." That sort of thing might not play well on the RNC stage this week, but it's worth considering if the GOP wants to get serious about inflation.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: How Immigration Law Magnifies the Injustice Inflicted by the War on Drugs

Billy Binion is a reporter at Reason.

Republican PartyElection 2024Campaigns/ElectionsElectionsDonald TrumpEconomyInflationFree TradeTariffsGovernment SpendingFederal governmentCoronavirusPandemicJoe BidenDemocratic PartyBiden AdministrationTrump AdministrationBill ClintonEconomicsPoliticsDebtNational DebtGrocery storesGasolineCorporationsEnergy & EnvironmentUkraineWarSocial SecurityMedicareMedicare reformRepublican Convention 2024
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (58)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

    Not sure Billy. With all the democrats and RINO scum blocking spending cuts (your fellow travelers, and their collaborators) it’s a tough problem.

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   11 months ago

      Don't forget MAGA Rs getting rid of the sequester by teaming up with Dems.

      1. Mother's Lament   11 months ago

        We're all economic leftists now. The only thing left to do is argue about trannies and immigrants.

  2. Wizzle Bizzle   11 months ago

    Reason has become a joke. They're all about limited government and personal freedom, so long as we're only talking about rampant drugs, rampant abortion and rampant illegal immigration.

    To pretend there is no distinction between the Rs and Ds on taxes and spending is next-level bullshit. I hate the Republican party because it is useless and rarely slows the nation's leftward spiral. But the other party is actively evil and antithetical to all supposed Libertarian economic principles.

    If you're not going to devote your space and "talents" to stemming our impending economic doom, please do A) go get a job at The Guardian, B) eat shit, and C) choke on B.

    1. Stuck in California   11 months ago

      Like and subscribe.

      The Rs don't represent me at all, but I know what happens when you let the Ds have unchecked power. Especially now that they're controlled by the progressive wing.

      1. Overt   11 months ago

        The agenda under Obama was quite congenial and progressive, and it delivered almost all of the dysfunction we are dealing with today. The weaponization of Patriot Act against political adversaries, the institutionalization of censorship by proxy, the crackdown on opioids and resulting Fentanyl "crisis", the nationalization of our banking system, the federalization of our student loan system, the financial rot of Quantitative Easing- and its destruction of the bond markeds- the entrenchment of corruption in Ukraine- when you look at all the cancers revealing themselves over the last 6 years in our federal government, they began during the Obama administration.

        And Reason is completely clueless as to the causes- instead trying to lecture us that Inflation is complicated and due to complex factors. This, they think, is somehow serious journalism.

        1. MasterThief   11 months ago

          I found that line to be laughable. The recent dramatic rise in inflation is due to government spending. It's probably the primary driver. Did Republicans propose a bunch of new spending? If not then they are already addressing inflation, debt, and the size of government far better than democrats

          1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

            Causes of inflation in order:

            Free money to everyone (student loans, inflation reduction, targeted subsidies, increases to welfare programs)

            Continued increasing regulatory policy (manufacturing standards, permitting costs rising, limiting energy and production)

            Increased demand from 10M given federal funds for illegal immigration.

            Dependency on foreign supply chains.

            1. SRG2   11 months ago

              Cite?

              1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

                Which one do you think didnt happen shrike?

                1. SRG2   11 months ago

                  I wonder about both the ordering and their quantifiable effects.

                  1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

                    Which one are you denying shrike?

                    1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

                      He doesn’t know.

          2. sarcasmic   11 months ago

            Did Republicans propose a bunch of new spending? If not then they are already addressing inflation, debt, and the size of government far better than democrats

            The federal government is rushing towards a financial cliff. Republicans are better than Democrats because the former's preferred speed is 130mph while the latter's preferred speed is 150mph. Sure. But easing up on the gas isn't hitting the brakes.

            1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

              We get it. Both sides. Both equally at fault. Joe can't be blamed. Tax cuts bad. deregulation bad. Vote Democrat.

              1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

                The last three years were nearly mean tweet free!

            2. DesigNate   11 months ago

              Except the one going slower does occasionally tap the brakes. Then the one going faster claims they’re racist/sexist/fascist assholes who want to kill granny.

              All the while the passengers on one side are asking their driver to slow down and the passengers on the other side are screaming to go even faster. (Sorry, this analogy gets a little unwieldy as you extrapolate it)

        2. Rick James   11 months ago

          So what does all this have to do with sex workers?

          1. Wizzle Bizzle   11 months ago

            Did we just become best friends?

    2. One-Punch_Man   11 months ago

      People say there are two parties - the stupid party (Rs) and the evil party (Ds). They leave off the Complaining party with no answers (L)

  3. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   11 months ago

    Biden's been President for 3½ years now, yet you only include that one $1.9T stimulus package in his spending and don't report any of his debt? What about the $2T debt this year alone?

    Trump added about $8 trillion to the debt over his tenure, and Biden quickly followed that up with a $1.9 stimulus package.

    4 Oranges against one half-eaten apple is not a useful comparison.

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

      We still have to pretend Trump was the sole cause of covid spending and shut downs to make the comparison even slightly work.

      Also ignore congressional makeup during the increased spending years.

      1. One-Punch_Man   11 months ago

        Trump was no fiscal hawk for sure. In his defense, no-one knew what to do about covid. The money spent seemed like an answer to help at the time. Of course, you assumed spending cuts or other ways for the money to comeback. D's said nope. More free money for all my homies!

  4. Overt   11 months ago

    "That's because inflation, like most issues, is complex and multifaceted,[...]But there were many other factors as well, including a global pandemic and volatile energy markets due to international conflict."

    It is absurd that this is the level of writing on display at Reason. Of all the writers, Binion is the most arrogantly snarky and yet clueless of all of them. Inflation is a monetary phenomenon. It is not caused by volatile energy markets. Or global pandemics. It is caused by governments (and their central banks) increasing the volume or velocity of currency.

    But rather than tackle those admittedly dry and intellectual subjects in an article, Binion takes the safe route and falls back to Reason's standard "Pox on both your houses" angle. How lazy.

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   11 months ago

      It's especially aggravating that an ostensibly-libertarian writer at an ostensibly-libertarian magazine would be so far off target. There's nothing complicated about inflation.

    2. PlateOfFish   11 months ago

      More money chasing less goods creates inflation. That can be caused by either increasing the money supply or increased scarcity of goods and services.

  5. CountmontyC   11 months ago

    So what was inflation under Trump in his first term? It was an annual 1.9%. Under the Biden Maladministration it has been triple that at 5.7%.
    So a comparison clearly favors Trump and his policies. And it isn't simply the spending policies either. Energy prices have increased much more under the Biden Maladministration than under Trump because the Biden Maladministration's policies towards energy have been overtly hostile with drilling bans among other things.
    One reason Biden is losing is because we can compare economic conditions under the Biden Maladministration vs under the Trump Administration and those economic conditions favor Trump substantially.

  6. Vernon Depner   11 months ago

    A party convention is no place to get serious.

    1. Longtobefree   11 months ago

      Exactly.
      What part of 'party' don't they understand at Reason?

      1. Vernon Depner   11 months ago

        They should understand, since they're supposed to be Libertarians, the party that has Elvis, Bigfoot, and space aliens at their conventions.

  7. VinniUSMC (Banana Republic Day 5/30/24)   11 months ago

    Whistlin' past the graveyard. Which is likely to be worse? More Biden, or more Trump?

  8. Moderation4ever   11 months ago

    President Trump, in his first term, benefited from a good economy passed along by President Obama. I would expect that a second Trump Presidency will benefit from the reduction in inflation happening now. Inflation is too complex for a President to have too much influence, but most are willing to take credit when it is reduced.

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

      Parody. A really retarded parody.

      Obama literally tried to convince the country 2% growth was the new standard lol.

      He passed ACA to take over the medical industry lol.

      1. Moderation4ever   11 months ago

        Trump economic growth was no better than Obama's or BIden's. Trump had the pandemic, but Obama had the great recession and Biden also had the pandemic.

        https://www.investopedia.com/gdp-growth-by-president-8604042

        1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

          Covid was planned right? Growth is higher out of recessions dummy.

          Parody.

    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   11 months ago

      AR-15's spray bullets.

    3. DesigNate   11 months ago

      lol, okay.

  9. DaveH   11 months ago

    Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon. Wait! Didn't someone already say that? Hey Billy, get your economics straight.

  10. Uomo Del Ghiaccio   11 months ago

    Biden gets a F- on steroids on the economy where Trump gets a D on the economy. Trump was a mediocre president, but Biden is the ultimate disaster. Neither should be president, but it's not very likely that someone else will be president that one of these two "Turds". The "Orange Turd" is far better than the "Demented Turd".

    Even though I will not vote for either, I hope that the next president will surrounds himself with libertarian minded people. Either one would be a lame-duck; with the "Demented Turd" you will get ever more spending; with the "Orange Turd" there is more of a possibility of some dismantling of the largest of the federal government.

    Little chance versus no chance. either way we will end up with a "Turd", but one "Turd" just may be better than the other "Turd". Time will tell.

  11. Xdd87   11 months ago

    Are you kidding me? This isn't rocket science! Lowering the cost of energy reduces the cost of goods and services. Competition will do the rest.

  12. Longtobefree   11 months ago

    "BILLY BINION is a reporter at Reason."
    "But Do They Have a Better Plan?"

    It should be that a 'reporter' would be able to research the inflation rates under the Trump administration, and under the Biden administration, and answer that question.

    But since it always appears that the search engines at Reason don't work, the answer to the question is "yes".

  13. sarcasmic   11 months ago

    If Trump had won in 2020 the economy would have still turned to crap, there still would have been inflation, gas prices would still have spiked, and his popularity would have been in the shitter.

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

      Cite? Is it on google.com?

      Amazing how you always make excuses for dems with DNC talking points.

      1. sarcasmic   11 months ago

        The fact that the stage had been set for a crappy economy by the lockdowns, inflation was going to happen because of money put into the economy by the CARES Act, and energy prices are beyond the control of the president.
        So it wouldn’t have mattered who was in office. The same crap would have happened and they would be very unpopular.
        You are too stupid to comprehend this so you bark like the partisan attack dog that you are. Whoof whoof whoof goes Jesse the dunce who is too stupid to have a conversation.
        Fuck off.

        1. Don't look at me!   11 months ago

          Joe is blameless.
          /sarc.

        2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

          I get it. Your continued use of bald assertions to defend Joe is all you have.

          First question. Did Biden have a change to energy policy? What is the effect of energy policy on inflation?

          Second question. What was the vote total for the Inflation Reduction Act?

          Third question. Has Joe’s administration increased regulatory foot prints?

          Fourth question. Did Biden’s policies extend the Covid response??

          This is why people call you a leftist sarc. Your blind defense of democrats at every turn.

          Youre also back to using dehumanizing language just like Hitler when a Democrat is attacked.

          Youre a moron sarc. One who runs around with Jeff defending everything the left does. While accusing others of partisanship.

  14. Don't look at me!   11 months ago

    No widespread inflation.

  15. SRG2   11 months ago

    Republicans Hammer Biden on Inflation. But Do They Have a Better Plan?

    No.

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

      Cite?

      You liberals are really scrambling since the shooting.

      1. SRG2   11 months ago

        Nothing to do with the shooting. Where's the better plan?

    2. Don't look at me!   11 months ago

      Poor shrike.

      1. SRG2   11 months ago

        Replying to the wrong poster.

  16. Use the Schwartz   11 months ago

    '90's is as old as time now.

    Sheesh.

    1. Rick James   11 months ago

      But at Reason, you'd think it was yesterday.

  17. TJJ2000   11 months ago

    "Trump added $8T"
    Keep pounding the LIE until LIES become truths.

    https://budget.house.gov/press-release/fact-check-alert-debunking-crfbs-analysis-of-trump-and-biden-impacts-on-the-national-debt

    Democrats wrote the CARES ACT. Democrats unanimously passed the CARES ACT. Democrats thwarted the House vote on the CARES ACT then turned around and took a double-dip after they got a trifecta.

    ...but, but, but ... "It was all Trumps Fault!" /s

    Take the CARES ACT out and Trumps entire administration NEVER ran even a $1T deficit. Biden's lowest is $1.4T.

    1. SRG2   11 months ago

      You can argue that the increase in the debt under the two presidents will have different long-term impacts – though much of that is dependent on your economic models. You can apply private accounting methods if you like.

      I note that according to the OMB tables, in real terms revenues scarcely rose after the TCJA, and revenues as a percentage of GDP declined

      In real 2017 dollars
      Revenues outlays % of GDP
      2017 3,316.2 3,981.6 16.3 20.6
      2018 3,259.5 4,022.1 16.3 20.1
      2019 3,333.0 4,279.6 16.1 20.9

      Source OMB
      https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/hist01z3_fy2025.xlsx

      You’re gullible.

      1. TJJ2000   11 months ago

        It's amazing you can spend all that writing saying Taxes got Cut.
        "revenues as a percentage of GDP declined"

        Oh.. The Horror! Taxes were CUT!!! /s

  18. Bladernr1001   11 months ago

    Well, one thing Trump has talked about is setting policy to reverse some of the green agenda.....like Kudlow used to say - "Drill baby drill".

    Our domestic oil production is pretty good now but it seems the market has priced in future supply shortages because Biden wants to "end fossil fuel". Which is a pipe dream for the time being.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Wait, Lilo & Stitch Is About Medicaid and Family Separation?

Peter Suderman | 5.30.2025 1:59 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!