Judge Quashes Felony Murder Charges Against Former Houston Cop Whose Lies Led to a Deadly 2019 Drug Raid
Gerald Goines' lawyers argued that the indictment did not adequately specify the underlying felony of tampering with a government document.

It has been more than five years since Houston police officers killed Dennis Tuttle and Rhogena Nicholas, a middle-aged couple falsely implicated in drug dealing, after breaking into their home on Harding Street. That raid was based on a fraudulent search warrant affidavit in which veteran narcotics officer Gerald Goines described a heroin purchase that he later admitted never happened. Efforts to hold Goines accountable for his lethal dishonesty hit another roadblock last week when a Harris County judge dismissed two felony murder charges against him.
The Harris County District Attorney's Office charged Goines with two counts of felony murder in August 2019, seven months after the Harding Street raid. According to its complaint, Goines committed "the felony offense of Tampering with a Government Record, and while in the course of and [in] furtherance of the commission of said offense did commit an act clearly dangerous to human life"—i.e., "making forcible entry into a residence by armed peace officers through the use of a 'no knock' search warrant based on false information provided knowingly by the defendant," thereby causing the deaths of Tuttle and Nicholas.
A grand jury backed those charges in an indictment issued on January 15, 2020, and District Court Judge Frank Aguilar declined to dismiss them. But District Court Judge Veronica Nelson, who took over the case this year after Aguilar was suspended because of a domestic violence arrest, was persuaded by Goines' claim that the charges did not adequately specify the underlying felony.
Prosecutors cited Section 37.10 of the Texas Penal Code, which makes it a third-degree felony to tamper with a government record in any of six ways. Because the indictment did not say exactly how Goines had violated that statute, his lawyers argued, it impaired his ability to mount a defense. "It doesn't give us adequate notice of what it is specifically that we have to defend against," said Mac Secrest, one of Goines' attorneys.
"The Harris County District Attorney's office is shocked and tremendously disappointed that a judge would choose to revisit this issue, knowing that her predecessor had already ruled the defendant's position meritless," the office said in response to Nelson's ruling. "The office is considering all its options, including amending the indictment, with an eye towards trying this case as soon as possible to ensure justice for the victims of these crimes."
The state case against Goines had been scheduled for trial in June. Nelson's decision could delay the trial by a year or more, depending on how long it takes to appeal the ruling and/or seek a new indictment. Goines also faces federal civil rights charges in connection with the Harding Street raid, but there has been no apparent movement in that case since the indictment was announced in November 2019.
Two other defendants in the federal case have pleaded guilty. Patricia Ann Garcia, a neighbor whose phony tip prompted Goines' investigation of Tuttle and Nicholas, pleaded guilty to making false reports in March 2021 and was sentenced to 40 months in prison. In June 2021, former Houston narcotics officer Steven Bryant, who had backed up Goines' fictional account of arranging for a confidential informant to buy heroin from Tuttle, pleaded guilty to falsifying records and obstructing the resulting federal investigation. He has not been sentenced yet.
Goines and Bryant are also defendants in two federal lawsuits filed by relatives of Tuttle and Nicholas in January 2021. Those lawsuits, one of which also names former Houston Police Chief Art Acevedo as a defendant, are scheduled for trial in September.
"Justice in the HPD Harding Street killings remains a far-off prospect, at least in the hands of the US Attorney and District Attorney offices," Mike Doyle, an attorney who represents the Nicholas family, said in an emailed statement. "The family of Rhogena Nicholas remains disappointed that local, state, and federal authorities have either ignored this injustice or helped delay the Goines murder prosecution. The legal explanations aside, we're now in a sixth year of a taxpayer-funded coverup of these murders. The Nicholas family still will not give up its ongoing fight to reveal the truth of what happened before, during and after the killing of Rhogena."
Update, April 4: On Wednesday, according to the Harris County District Attorney's Office, a grand jury approved new felony murder indictments against Goines. One of his attorneys, Nicole DeBorde Hochglaube, said she had not seen the new documents yet and therefore did not know exactly how the language had been changed.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
And also in the sixth year we have not yet received an answer as to how four or five drug warriors were shot during the "dynamic entry" when no one already inside the house had a firearm except them. They were clearly shot by each other, yet the newspapers have remained amazingly silent about this part of the coverup for six years and counting. So much for justice, especially in Big Blue Cities like Houston. The incompetence of the Prosecutors is matched only by the incompetence of the Magistrates, incompetence of the Mayor and the incompetence of the Chief of Police.
What are you talking about? Tuttle had a 6-shot revolver. And being startled out of a nap, taken at unawares, shot 5 cops with 6 expertly placed shots, just like an active duty marine sniper might.
the dog came out blazing.
So let me get this straight, I just want to confirm. If a cop runs over another cop while I'm getting busted for a felony nearby, that's felony murder on me, but if I, the cop, forge a bunch of knowing lies that direct other cops to kill innocent people... that's not felony murder. It's the murdered people's own damn fault for being in their own house when we decided to start shooting at it. These kinds of these just happen, oh well, nothing to see here, move along?
Cops can shoot someone who is over 20 feet away, claim "He looked like he was going to charge at me," and nothing else will happen. A non-cop who does that will not pass go.
Is it cool for cops to shoot unarmed people in the back?
Only if they can't see.
sarcasmic 2 months ago (edited)
Flag Comment
Mute User
I back the blue when they’re right. In this case, as you very well know, the cop didn’t know she was unarmed and from his vantage point he couldn’t see the crowd. He just saw someone crawling through a smashed barricade while hearing chaos on the police radio. So based upon what he knew based upon what he could see and hear, he did what he thought was right.
“He did what he thought was right “
That didn’t work very well at Nuremberg.
I guess it could work for sarc though.
Um ... shoot first and ask questions later? "I didn't know what was happening so I shot sumbuddy ..."
Yes, you have it right. Another cop was charged with murdering Rhogena by firing blindly from OUTSIDE the house through a blank wall while she was sitting in her living room chair, but the District Attorney's office screwed THAT one up, too, and those charges were dropped. Never ascribe to malice what can easily be blamed on incompetence?
Don't wanna get shot like a thug? Don't sit in a chair like a thug.
"Never ascribe to malice what can easily be blamed on incompetence?"
That principle would only be valid if malice and incompetence were mutually exclusive, but they aren't.
The expression is meant to make a distinction between deliberate and unintentional.
So if an incompetent person is being malicious, then their malice trumps their incompetence because what they’re doing is on purpose.
What about plain old murder? You put things in motion that result in murder . . . .
Cops get the best attorneys that asset forfeiture can buy.
It also doesn't hurt if your Police Union has the Mayor, the City Council and the District Attorney firmly in their back pocket and in their corner. Gotta luvit.
That and fear of retribution. Pissing off people with guns who can do whatever they want is a great way to shorten your life expectancy.
And you are definitely on the side of government guns. Don’t try to deny it.
... and immunity. This is why prohibition fanatics can demand thugs with guns coerce every man, woman and child for thousands of miles in every direction. When the thugs kill a bunch of people "in good faith," some Houston judge waves a pen and IT NEVER HAPPENED! This way the pigs can "prove" that Chinese fentanyl kills (ergo "drugs" kill), but lying thugs enforcing superstitious laws NEV-AH kill anyone, and that's the Gospel truth. Q.E.D. NOTE: Even when hundreds of witnesses record a cop murdering, a way is found to deny it.
Wow. Old school Jacob actually doing what he was good at before his tragic TDS infection. Reminded me of this,
https://www.kwtx.com/2023/05/17/twin-peaks-shooting-look-back-event-8-years-later/
And eight years later, about 90 bikers who filed civil rights lawsuits are still waiting to see if their false arrest claims can move forward in court. At least four of the bikers have died while their cases have been pending.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in April 2022 reinstated the lawsuits – at least temporarily – of about 90 bikers arrested in the shootout after their cases were dismissed in 2021 by U.S. District Judge Alan Albright.
The three-judge panel reversed Albright’s previous ruling that a grand jury’s indictment of the 90 bikers “served to break the chain of causation” for their false arrest claims and sent the cases back to Albright for further consideration.
The 5th Circuit panel’s opinion put the civil lawsuits of about 90 bikers back in play and instructed Albright to determine if each defendant has alleged adequate claims that they were falsely arrested after the shootout.
While parties in the lawsuit took the deposition of McLennan County Assistant District Attorney Mark Parker last week and have deposed three bikers whose suits are pending, they await Albright’s response to the 5th Circuit’s orders.
Parker, who helped draft an early version of the arrest warrant affidavits, declined comment Tuesday on his deposition.
Attorneys for the bikers challenged the validity of the arrest warrant affidavits, claiming the bikers arrested were charged in identical, “cookie-cutter” documents with engaging in organized criminal activity that did not take each biker’s actions or individual culpabilities into account. The bikers all were jailed under $1 million bonds, including some bikers who were just getting off their bikes when the brawl started and some who hadn’t even pulled into the parking lot.
Doxing by written document is still doxing.
It took them 6 years of judge shopping to find one that would dismiss the charges. Most people would have done that time in jail. Why aren't these cops treated the same as anyone else? Why are they held above the law?
"The" law is written and interpreted by looter prohibitionists. The Republican Comstock law of 1873 used the postal monopoly to enslave women into involuntary reproduction. Dems, including the southern ones that murdered close to 100 blacks in Louisiana, began voting against Republicans. To save Comstockism the Reconstruction amendments were gutted by the Suprema. To "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude" the Court added, "deny and abridge women!" Other such extirpations quashed the indictments, but the Dems still elected Tilden--for a while.
It is mind-boggling to me that you guys are so against the 5th Amendment. Presumption of innocence, protection against arbitrary and undefined prosecution, clear articulation of the charges being accused - these apparently mean NOTHING to you.
"We charge you with felony murder."
"What felony?"
"Tampering with a government record in one of six ways."
"Which one?"
"Uhhhhh...."
Or maybe that's just when they're applied to cops. Something tells me if we were talking about some acolyte from the Cult of Saint Jorge the Fentanyl Eater committing felonies faster than they can be counted, or some illegal border jumping scumbag all of a sudden you'd be hitting up ChatGPT and Gemini for all their copy/paste info on Constitutional Law.
Put it on Jake. Put on the nose.
https://c.tenor.com/T3x7tyBXKVMAAAAd/clown-nose.gif
I'm starting to get tired of saying it, but I just have to here. All LE departments, agencies, districts, etc. should be strongly encouraged (I'd prefer 'required' but that won't hunt) to remove the "Serve and Protect" motto from al their vehicles and documents. We know whom they choose to protect and how they do it, and backing the blue shouldn't include condoning blatant hypocrisy.
BANNED On The Bayou: Well goodbye Joe You gotta go For a swim-o
It'll be rough With the cuffs, Me-oh-my-oh
Get laid off for a week Maybe two-oh
With a badge and a fun gonna have big fun, On The Bayou.