Lawmakers Try To Insert Privacy Protections Into the Feds' Snooping Powers
The bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act would stop a lot of warrantless surveillance as a condition for renewal of Section 702 authorities.

A bipartisan collection of privacy-minded lawmakers today announced the introduction of a bill that would reform and restrain the authorities of federal agencies from snooping on American citizens and collecting data without getting a warrant first.
Federal surveillance authorities under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) are up for congressional renewal this year. Section 702 is intended to authorize the warrantless surveillance of foreigners outside of the United States for potential threats to national security. But in truth, through various loopholes and tricks, these authorities have been used by the federal government to collect and track domestic data and communications by American citizens, without us knowing and without warrants.
We've had years of evidence that federal intelligence authorities like the National Security Agency (NSA) have been misusing their powers and a number of legislative attempts to rein them in. Today, a pack of lawmakers introduced the Government Surveillance Reform Act of 2023, intended to add several new restrictions to protect Americans from warrantless snooping and collection of data as a condition of renewing Section 702.
The law is co-sponsored in both the House and Senate by privacy- and liberty-minded lawmakers from both parties, from Sen. Ron Wyden (D–Ore.) and Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D–Calif.) on the left to Sen. Mike Lee (R–Utah) and Rep. Nancy Mace (R–S.C.) on the right, among others.
"The FISA Court and the Director of National Intelligence have confirmed that our government conducted warrantless surveillance of millions of Americans' private communications," said Lee in a prepared statement. "It is imperative that Congress enact real reforms to protect our civil liberties, including warrant requirements and statutory penalties for privacy violations, in exchange for reauthorizing Section 702. Our bipartisan Government Surveillance Reform Act stops illegal government spying and restores the Constitutional rights of all Americans."
Their bill addresses and attempts to end a host of different ways that federal authorities have attempted to make end runs around the Fourth Amendment's requirements that officials get a warrant before accessing Americans' private data or communications. Some of the important reforms include:
- Ending the "backdoor search" loophole. The massive collection of data authorized by FISA has created a trove of stored info that the FBI has accessed to investigate domestic crimes, even though that data was collected without warrants for the alleged purpose of protecting us from foreign spies and terrorists. The power of the FBI to do so was actually expanded under President Donald Trump (in spite of his anger over being subjected to secret surveillance). The Government Surveillance Reform Act would close this loophole by requiring authorities to get a warrant before searching citizens' data.
- Ending "reverse targeting" of Americans in foreign surveillance. One clever bypass federal snoops have used to listen in on Americans' communications without having to get a warrant has been to target foreigners overseas those Americans talk to instead. When FISA authorities allow the NSA to wiretap foreign targets, they will have access to all sides of the communication, and that includes Americans whom under normal situations they would not be able to snoop on so secretly, thanks to the Fourth Amendment. This bill would prohibit such targeting without consent and prevent the use of data gathered this way in court proceedings.
- Ending the authority for surveillance "about" U.S. citizens. Another way the feds secretly spy on us is by collecting data and communications that are "about" us that come from valid foreign FISA surveillance targets. In other words, the feds can tangentially snoop on specific Americans by warrantlessly collecting communications from foreign sources that mention them. This bill would end that practice.
- Ending purchases of private data from third-party brokers. In order to bypass warrant and Fourth Amendment requirements to gather private information about Americans, government agencies have been turning to third-party data brokers who compile information from our use of phones and computers. Government agencies simply buy data that we have stored through third-party sources that they would not be allowed to access on their own without a warrant or subpoena. This bill would prohibit such purchases.
And there's more to the full bill, which can be read here. It is chock full of changes to surveillance authorities that some lawmakers have been trying to pass for years now, in exchange for a four-year renewal of Section 702.
As such, the bill also has support from civil rights and privacy groups from across the political spectrum, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the National Association for Criminal Defense Lawyers, FreedomWorks, Restore the Fourth, the Due Process Institute, and many others.
"We have said again and again that Section 702 should not be reauthorized absent fundamental reforms, said Kia Hamadanchy, a senior policy council at the ACLU, in a prepared statement. "The Government Surveillance Reform Act meets this high standard. This legislation would address the countless abuses of Section 702 we have seen from the government, and it would ensure the protection of Americans' Fourth Amendment rights. Congress should not vote to reauthorize Section 702 without the critical reforms contained in this bill."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Just let it die with(out) dignity.
Most of the shit passed as laws in the aftermath of 9/11 aren't all that useful, are open to abuse, and harm freedom more than they restrict terrorism.
You don't buy crack if you aren't planning to abuse it - and buy more in the future.
ya but still they could cut back a little and be insanely high.
It would be interesting to know how many crimes/ terrorists/ events have been stopped / prevented due to such snooping.
I say close to zero.
My guess is that if anyone try an FOIA search to answer that excellent question, they will not get the info needed.
I doubt the number is actually zero, but as you say, it will be pretty close to it.
Fewer than have been created by FBI "sting" operations.
This might be an improvement, although there's no guarantee that the deep state will actually COMPLY with the new restrictions. Along with the evidence listed in the article, there's also massive evidence that our official snoops knowingly violated clearly defined protections already in place.
Work for 2-3 hours in your spare time and get paid $1000 on your bank account every Make everyone ( £26,000 __ £38,000 ) A Month Online Making nb money online more than £20k just by doing simple work With No Prior Experience Or Skills Required. Be Your Own Boss And for more info visit any tab this site…
Open this link. . . . . . . . . .>>> http://www.Richcash1.com
EXACTLY. They don't give a shit about any laws. There are no consequences.
Get back to us when any of this actually passes - - - - - - - - -
The NSA is as clean as Biden’s diapers.
Speaking of Section 702....
Which president had this to say about Section 702?
Was it:
A. George W. Bush
B. Barack Obama
C. Joe Biden
D. Donald Trump
If you answered (D), correct!
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/statement-president-fisa-amendments-reauthorization-act-2017/
He also said:
The president announced in a tweet that he signed the bill to renew Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
“This is NOT the same FISA law that was so wrongly abused during the election,” he wrote. “I will always do the right thing for our country and put the safety of the American people first!”
You are so right. It was amended to "do the right thing". Which is why it needs more privacy protections now, right? Because Trump "did the right thing" back in 2017?
It’s called incremental progress. Perhaps one day we will be rid of the whole thing.
Oddly enough Jeff supported 702 being used against Trump's campaign.
Shhh! You're ruining his narrative.
Has that ever stopped jeff?
oddly enough, or derpa derp of course?
Oh nothing odd about jeff. Except for his waddle as he chases kids with ice cream cones. Can never tell which one he is after.
If Jeff leaves Chicago at 9:00 am chasing after a kid with an ice cream cone headed towards Cleveland and a bear in a trunk leaves Cleveland at 11:15 am headed towards Chicago, how many complaints will sarc utter regarding “but Trump” until the authorities arrive at the scene of the interception?
A: SPB2 times.
Fuck your multivariate calculus.
Math is racist
"Work from home and let me take care of your tasks! With my expertise and dedication, I'll ensure that your work is done efficiently and effectively.I just started 1 weeks ago and I've gotten 1st checks for a total of $2,200. Say goodbye to stress and hello to productivity. Let's work together and achieve great things from the comfort of your own home!" click this link, then do the tasks. .. >>> http://www.fb.salaryoption1.com
https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1721956460777578738?t=U6X3AB-3HE7zRw8OYYK7CA&s=19
All-white Army ad
A day after we learn the FBI suppressed the antiwhite manifesto
Neocons cant get their cannon fodder if the boys know thats what they’re for
[Link]
Work for 2-3 hours in your spare time and get paid $1000 on your bank account every Make everyone ( £26,000 __ £38,000 ) A Month Online Making nb money online more than £20k just by doing simple work With No Prior Experience Or Skills Required. Be Your Own Boss And for more info visit any tab this site…
Open this link. . . . . . . . . .>>> http://www.Richcash1.com
It doesn't matter. As the article points out they ILLEGALLY obtained millions of records and they will continue to do so.