Alabama Botched His Execution. Now He Wants To Die Differently.
On Monday, the Supreme Court sided with an Alabama death-row inmate who, after surviving a botched lethal injection attempt last year, says he wants to die by gas chamber instead.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied an appeal from the state of Alabama in its case against a death row inmate who sued for the right to be executed by gas rather than lethal injection. The ruling is the latest development following a string of failed and botched executions in Alabama—one of which the suing prisoner actually survived.
In 1996, Kenneth Eugene Smith was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1988 murder of Elizabeth Sennett in Sheffield, Alabama. Despite the jury voting 11-1 to sentence Smith to life in prison, a judge overruled the jury and sentenced Smith to die. (Alabama became the final state to outlaw judicial overrides in 2017.)
In June 2022, Alabama's Department of Corrections sought to schedule Smith's execution. Smith sued the department in August, alleging that the state's recent history of botched executions using lethal injection meant he would likely be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. He also argued that he had a 14th Amendment due process right to be informed of the comparative disadvantages of lethal injection and a gas chamber, which Alabama built in 2021.
In September 2022, the Alabama Supreme Court allowed the department to schedule Smith's execution for November 17, 2022. On the day of his scheduled execution, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled in Smith's favor, finding that the state should honor his request to be killed by nitrogen hypoxia, the state's chosen form of lethal gas.
"Smith plausibly pleads that there is an available alternative method that will reduce the risk of severe pain," the opinion reads. "Alabama's statutorily authorized method of execution (nitrogen hypoxia) could not be considered unavailable simply because no mechanism to implement the procedure had been finalized."
However, immediately after that ruling was announced, the U.S. Supreme Court lifted the stay, allowing Alabama to proceed with executing Smith by lethal injection.
Prison officials, as they'd done during two previous executions several months prior, failed to place an IV line for the lethal injection drugs correctly. According to a November legal filing, officials strapped Smith to a gurney for hours and repeatedly jabbed him with needles in his hands, arms, and collarbone. Sometime before midnight, officials gave up and led him back to his cell.
Following the state's failed execution attempt, Alabama Governor Kay Ivey called for a moratorium on executions pending an internal review of the state's execution procedures. The Alabama Department of Corrections completed its self-review in February and submitted it to Ivey. The review has not been released publicly, but led to Alabama announcing on May 3rd that it would resume executions using lethal injection starting in June.
Because Smith did not die during his first execution attempt, his case proceeded. On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied cert on an appeal from the state attempting to reverse the 11th Circuit ruling allowing Smith to be executed by gas chamber, as he had previously requested.
Thus, Smith will eventually get his wish to be executed by gas rather than by needle. Alabama built a gas chamber in 2021 after lawmakers suggested that death by nitrogen hypoxia—where inmates would be forced to breathe a lethal concentration of nitrogen gas—would be more humane than lethal injection. Several other states, including Mississippi and Oklahoma, have passed laws legalizing nitrogen hypoxia as a "backup" method of execution. However, while hundreds of American prisoners have been executed in gas chambers, none have been killed by nitrogen hypoxia.
Because of the method's lack of prior use—Alabama says it hasn't even finished its formal execution protocol—selecting nitrogen gas as an execution method will likely cause a delay in the state's next attempt to execute Smith.
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito noted this likelihood in their dissent, arguing that Smith failed to show that Alabama is ready to execute him by nitrogen hypoxia. "Smith, however, did not even attempt to plead facts indicating that Alabama 'could readily use [nitrogen hypoxia] to execute him . . . Instead, he alleged only that, '[a]s a matter of law, nitrogen hypoxia is an available and feasible alternative method of execution,'" Thomas writes. "And the Eleventh Circuit considered this threadbare allegation sufficient to satisfy Smith's pleading burden on the availability element."
As for whether nitrogen hypoxia is a better way to die than lethal injection, no one actually knows. The original gas chamber protocol used cyanide, supposedly for humane reasons, to horrifying results.
"Though the chamber had promised instantaneous and painless death, the ugliness and risk of its application eventually made it the country's shortest-lived method of execution," wrote Elizabeth Bruenig in The Atlantic last year. "In plain view of witnesses, prisoners died screaming, convulsing, groaning, and coughing, their hands clawing at their restraints and their eyes bulging and their skin turning cyanic."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
27 years? They could have killed him with second hand smoke in all that time.
Oooh! Ooooh! (hand raised)
Hahaha
“Oooh Oooh” actually kind of sounds like a monkey. Seems fitting. Like, I’m not particularly offended by this comment, but something tells me that you may just be a lower life form. I wonder if there’s anything about your brain anatomy that would suggest that.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,400 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
Faggot.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Easily start receiving more than $600 every single day from home in your part time. i made $18781 from this job in my spare time afte my college. easy to do job and its regular income are awesome. no skills needed to do this job all you need to know is how to copy and paste stuff online. join this today by follow details on this page.
.
.
Apply Now Here———————————————->>> http://Www.Coins71.Com
Murdered her in 1988.
(8 years pass)
Convicted and sentenced in 1996.
(27 years pass)
Still alive in 2023.
Damn! Just sentence him to execution by old age and turn him loose.
The ruling is the latest development following a string of failed and botched executions in Alabama—one of which the suing prisoner actually survived.
Finally! We *finally* get the use of the word 'botched' to describe an execution where the subject intended to be executed lived. Even if was only by accident and even if it's only narrowly correct if you squint at it from the proper angle, this is Reason, you take your narrative accuracy where you can get it.
” . . . repeatedly jabbed him with needles in his hands, arms, and collarbone . . . ”
Nobody in Alabama knows about the femoral artery?
The great big one?
Well, everybody in Alabama knows about 12 gauge shotguns.
How about that well known, well regulated militia, being armed to the teeth and trained to hit a target from 20 feet, being called upon to end this travesty? I think the only objection to doing that would be the prisoner would not die, '..... screaming, convulsing, groaning, and coughing, their hands clawing at their restraints and their eyes bulging and their skin turning cyanic....'
But then again, he might - - - -
Execution by firing squad is actually quite hard on the executioners. It's a general truth that the kind of people who are good at executions are generally not the kind of people who you want to trust with that power. It's a stronger truth when the means of execution is firing squad.
What would be the problem with barrel in mouth, pointing cranially and using a hollow point or just a shotgun with a slug? Hard to botch that one and should be easier on the executioner. I mean we’re killing em anyways, dignity may not be of any primary concern.
Or a lethal overdose of some pleasant drug. See no reason why not. Wait, I think I do. Pleasant suicide by justice system would become a thing. Now, that sounds like a European thing.
Don't care.
I would be curious how they justified the cyanide gas chamber in the first place.
As for nitrogen, we have evidence of workers accidentally entering tanks that had been filled with nitrogen to purge out the oxygen. Drop dead. And similar results from people in Africa who died of CO2 when a volcanic lake "burped". And of campers who died of CO1 from cooking in their tents.
. & Swinging around, there was a hangman in Britain who could swing a condemned man dead in about 10 seconds from starting the whole procedure.
Another example is shallow-water drowning by snorkelers. Some think that they can stay underwater longer by taking many deep breaths before diving. What they accomplish is lowering the level of carbon dioxide in their blood below normal levels. It is the level of carbon dioxide that brings on the need to gasp for air. What they end up doing is passing out from lack of oxygen before their brain senses a need to breathe. Then they drown.
On land, it’s a painless process, as the victim just passes out and is brain dead in a few minutes.
re: “how they justified the cyanide gas chamber in the first place”
Well, if you don’t actually watch someone die, you don’t know how the process really runs. If your only experience with cyanide poisoning is looking after the fact at people who died from it (and it did happen in industrial accidents), the end result doesn’t look all that bad. You didn’t get to see the intermittent stages of pain, panic, etc. When we used the technique in executions, those intermediate stages were … more evident.
Likewise, the African village that died of the CO2 “burp” looked just normally dead after. What you couldn’t see from just the end result is that CO2 asphyxiation produces the same sensations of drowning as asphyxiation in water. It was probably a pretty panicky way to go.
This is because the mammalian body does not actually sense or react to low oxygen levels. Our sense of panic and increased breathing is actually a reaction to the build-up of CO2 in the blood stream. In both CO2 and water asphyxiation, the body can’t purge the CO2.
This is also why nitrogen asphyxiation is so much more dangerous. CO2 is still allowed to leave the blood stream so the workers in those tanks have no clue that they’re not getting enough oxygen until they just pass out.
Carbon monoxide poisoning, by the way, follows a completely different biological pathway.
Bottom line: Cyanide is a bad way to go. CO2 asphixation is less bad but… CO1 has different drawbacks (such as looking like a lobster). If you have to go, choose N2 asphyxiation.
“such as looking like a lobster”
LMFAO
Anyone who ever saw the naked body of somebody who died from cyanide asphyxiation would NEVER forget the red skin colour.
Not a single surviving fuckwitness ever mentioned it though.
Hahaha
Also, no dark cherry red skin discolouration was visible in any supposed photographs of bodies of so called victims of the holocaust.
Explanations?
The fact is that you can’t explain it and your bigotry prevents you from recognizing the ONLY logical conclusion.
Not a single fuckwitness testimony or alleged photograph of bodies was of anyone who died from cyanide exposure.
So much for “evidence” of a holocaust.
Hahaha
Just get a few inmates to hold him down and another to slip a plastic bag over his head to asphyxiate him. All it will cost is a few cartons of cigarettes and you can easily dispose of the plastic bag just to be safe from naysaying do-gooders complaining about rights 'n shit.
If they had just given him insulin shots and statins all this time, he'd be long gone.
He could always choose to hang himself before his execution date.
Or they can epstien him
As long as he dies
Use the Idaho Method - a sock full of batteries in the exercise yard.
I think putting his head between Grond and the gates of Minas Tirith (or some similar arrangement) would be effective - unusual, though not cruel.
Gary Gilmore said it best, given a choice or the firing squad or hanging he oped for the firing squad, say anything else 'the government would fuck up".
Even a life long career criminal and indiscriminate mass murder knows how incompetent the government is at doing anything.
Despite the jury voting 11-1 to sentence Smith to life in prison, a judge overruled the jury and sentenced Smith to die.
Wait, holdup. What the eff ?
https://www.alreporter.com/2022/11/16/opinion-a-call-for-justice-not-a-cry-for-mercy-for-kenneth-eugene-smith/
When a state takes a life, even when justified by law, it assumes a grave responsibility on the part of its citizens because the execution is done in the name of the citizens. And acting upon the people’s will, both the Legislature and Ivey deemed judicial override to be improper.