The Louisville Cop Who Killed Breonna Taylor Has a New Law Enforcement Gig
Myles Cosgrove never faced criminal charges in connection with Taylor's death, but he was fired for his reckless use of deadly force.

Myles Cosgrove, the former Louisville detective who killed Breonna Taylor in a fruitless 2020 drug raid based on a fraudulent search warrant affidavit, was fired after that notorious incident for his reckless use of deadly force. The senseless death of a young African-American woman, along with the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis two months later, provoked nationwide protests in 2020 and became a leading example of the police abuse decried by Black Lives Matter. But that history did not faze the Carroll County, Kentucky, Sheriff's Office, which recently hired Cosgrove as a deputy.
Taylor was a 26-year-old EMT and aspiring nurse with no criminal record. Louisville police were investigating her ex-boyfriend, Jamarcus Glover, for drug dealing. Detective Joshua Jaynes obtained a hastily approved no-knock warrant to search Taylor's apartment based on information he later admitted was inaccurate. Even taking his affidavit at face value, it did not contain sufficient evidence to establish probable cause, let alone enough evidence to justify a warrant authorizing police to enter her home unannounced in the middle of the night.
The warrant was based almost entirely on guilt by association, plus the claim that Glover had received packages at Taylor's apartment. Although Jaynes implied in his affidavit that the packages may have contained drugs or drug money, he later admitted they had been described as Amazon shipments. The packages reportedly contained clothing and shoes.
Cosgrove was not responsible for the warrant, but he was responsible for what happened when police executed it around 12:40 a.m. on March 13, 2020. Despite their no-knock warrant, the officers banged on the door before breaking in, and they said they also announced themselves—a claim that was contradicted by Taylor's new boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, who was in the bedroom with her at the time of the raid, and by Taylor's neighbors, including one who initially agreed but later changed his story.
Alarmed by the banging and the sudden home invasion, Walker grabbed a handgun and fired a single shot at the intruders, striking Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly in his left thigh. Three officers responded with a hail of 32 bullets, six of which struck Taylor, who was unarmed and standing near Walker. Detective Brett Hankison blindly fired 10 of those rounds from outside the apartment. Mattingly fired six. Cosgrove fired 16, including the round that killed Taylor.
Cosgrove later told investigators the incident unfolded so quickly that he was not consciously aware of using his gun. "I just sensed that I've fired," he said. "It's like a surreal thing. If you told me I didn't do something at that time, I'd believe you. If you told me I did do something, I'd probably believe you, too." Although Walker fired just once, Cosgrove said he was "overwhelmed with bright flashes and darkness," which led him to believe "there's still these gunshots happening due to those bright lights." In other words, he misinterpreted the rounds that Mattingly fired as a continuing assault by Walker.
Hankison, who was charged with wanton endangerment under state law, was acquitted in March 2022. Five months later, the U.S. Justice Department charged him with violating constitutional rights under color of law by recklessly firing 10 rounds through "a covered window and covered glass door," thereby endangering Taylor, Walker, and three neighbors. Jaynes and two other officers also face federal charges in connection with the raid.
Cosgrove was never charged, because Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron concluded that he and Mattingly had acted in self-defense. But when interim Police Chief Yvette Gentry fired Cosgrove more than nine months after the raid, she said he failed to "properly identify a target" when he fired 16 rounds down a dark hallway. "The shots you fired went in three distinctly different directions, demonstrating that you did not identify a specific target," she wrote in her termination letter to Cosgrove. "Rather, you fired in a manner consistent with suppressive fire, which is in direct contradiction to our training, values and policy."
Gentry thought Cosgrove's explanation of his conduct was damning. "In your statement, you did not describe target isolation or target identification and instead described flashes that you did not properly evaluate as a threat," she wrote. "Had you evaluated the threat accurately, you would have likely stopped firing once the gunfire had stopped." In other words, Taylor probably would still be alive if Cosgrove had followed his training.
Cosgrove does not seem like the sort of person who should be trusted with a gun and a badge. But last November, The New York Times notes, "the Kentucky Law Enforcement Council voted not to revoke the certification that allows Mr. Cosgrove to work as a police officer in the state." That decision, which is part of a broader problem with cops who move on to other law enforcement agencies after they are fired for egregious misconduct, left Cosgrove free to apply for his new job in Carroll County, about an hour's drive from the city where he killed Taylor.
"In a county of roughly 11,000 residents that is 94 percent white and where 71 percent of voters went for former President Donald J. Trump in 2020," the Times reports, "supporters of the hiring were not hard to find." One resident who encountered a courthouse protest against Cosgrove's hiring did not understand the fuss. "He was never charged, so I don't know what the protesters are worried about," she said. "It's ridiculous."
Taylor's mother, Tamika Palmer, unsurprisingly takes a different view. "When are these cops going to stop protecting bad cops?" she asked in a statement. "The people in that county have now got a killer with a badge they've got to deal with."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
He was shot at and fired back, after his fellow officer had already taken a round in the leg. Your problem is with the process that led to him executing the warrant, not for him for executing it.
We don't require officers to be shot to death in the course of their duties, and we do still want to have criminals arrested. The problem is in making sure officers are executing their duties in a proper fashion.
My bigger issue is that Sollum is implying that because of one mistake he should be punished for life (when he wasn't even charged with a crime) yet Sollum also writes numerous stories on how actual convicted criminals should get a second chance after they serve their punishment. The cop was fired, i.e. punished, why doesn't he deserve a second chance?
Begin now earning every month an extra amount of $17k or more just by doing very simple and easy online job from home. I have received $18953 in my last month direct in my bank acc by doing this easy home base job just in my part time for 2 hrs maximum a day online. Even a child can now do this job and earns money online. Everybody can get this home job right now and start earning dollars online by follow details here..........
SITE. —> usdtwork.com
Mike, great work. I appreciate your work since I presently make more than $36,000 a month from one straightforward internet business! I am aware that you are now making a good living online starting sb-05 with merely $29,000, and they are simple internet operational chores.
.
.
Just click the link—————>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
why doesn’t he deserve a second chance?
Maybe because he's an incompetent fucktard:
I'm fine with incompetent fucktards not getting a second chance at a profession that, by it very nature, requires a high degree of competence.
And it's not like losing his law enforcement certification would bar him from earning a living at all, he could get a different job that doesn't involve entrusting him with the use of deadly force. In fact, that would be preferable.
That's a valid argument. However, the counter argument is that making the mistake has made him more aware and less likely to repeat it and therefore increases his competency. One of the things in nursing is that it's not if you make a med error but when, and that you are taught to use that as a learning process. Can you state unequivocally that he hasn't learned from his mistakes? If he learned and corrected his actions, isn't he more competent than before?
Can you state unequivocally that he hasn’t learned from his mistakes? If he learned and corrected his actions, isn’t he more competent than before?
Obviously not, but as I say below in a different response, which I won't rehash here, I would prefer for someone who could kill someone if they make a major mistake on the job to have consequences a bit harsher than just getting fired, and at minimum they should be barred from working for some amount of time before they can be reinstated.
Which now that I think about it, maybe this guy was, who knows. It's been three years since the Breonna Taylor shooting and I'm not sure what this guy was up to during that time. This is the first I've heard of him getting another LEO job somewhere. Sullum kind of leaves out any details there, and I don't give many people the benefit of the doubt these days, especially journalists.
Sullum is a leftist piece of shit. Do you really expect better of him at this point?
What was Sullum's take on Baldwin?
That he is innocent and nobody could ever accuse him of guilt for pointing a loaded gun at someone and pulling the trigger. His lack of principles would be sad if it wasn't so clear that he's a ridiculous partisan with zero adherence to truth
Your problem is with the process that led to him executing the warrant, not for him for executing it.
Yeah. All he did was lie to a judge to get the warrant and lie on the report about announcing himself. And so what if he shot wildly without identifying his target. Honest mistakes, right?
No that was the detective who lied on the warrant. And the announcement is disputed. I agree with TM, the policies and his superiors are at fault.
Now whether or not he should still pursue a career in law enforcement, I've no idea. But basing it on this one case, as egregious as it is, seems unfair. The officer was shot at, rightfully so, and he returned fire, again rightfully so.
He only got fired because it got in the news. Otherwise he would have gotten a promotion.
You got the first part right. He got fired because it made the news. The second part is entirely conjecture based upon your own bias and prejudices. Much like you claiming he lied on a warrant even Sollum states he didn't actually apply for, that it was his superiors who got the warrant.
So, you pretend to be open minded but anytime cops come up you jump to conclusions, and like this case, often without any fucking evidence. That's the opposite of open minded.
No wonder you so seldom have anything substantial to add. You actually don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
Your problem is with the process that led to him executing the warrant, not for him for executing it.
The detective who lied on the warrant application should have been fired too, and the judge who
signed off onrubber stamped it should be removed from office. But I'm fine with the cop going all Cyril Figgis getting fired too.Suppressing fire!!!!
Good reference
Yep. The reported details put the lion's share of blame on the judge who signed the warrant. It's a matter of bad luck that this officer specifically was the one firing the fatal shot after they were fired upon.
Also, Taylor was not innocent regarding the drugs and money laundering according to evidence. Trying to sanctify her in an article where that is completely irrelevant is both dumb and journalistic malpractice when the information has been available for years
Did you bother to read the article? Not even his own Police Chief bought that argument. He fired blindly in a panic. No matter how good the warrant was, his behavior was inexcusable in a cop.
He wasn't charged. Yes he was fired, and arguably for good cause. Does that mean he should be punished? Or do we allow for the possibility that he learned from his behavior and should be allowed to pursue employment in his chosen profession? Remember, Reason argues that people actually convicted of crimes should not be barred from employment after they serve their time. So, why should Sollum imply a different rule for someone who wasn't even charged with a crime?
Or do we allow for the possibility that he learned from his behavior and should be allowed to pursue employment in his chosen profession?
Learned to stop lying to get warrants and to stop lying on reports? Yeah right. If cops didn't lie they'd have nothing to say.
Shithead--it was the detective that got the warrant NOT this cop.
Do you not get that?
The cop got the warrant and, in the execution of the warrant, was fired upon. And he fired back.
Everything he did was above board.
Fired BACK.
He was only fired because Louisville is a blue cesspool.
If he says it enough, maybe it'll come true!
He’s too drunk and stupid to understand that.
Did you read the fucking story? Or just bashing the cop without knowing the facts, and making a knee jerk reaction? Because even Sollum states he wasn't the one who got the warrant. For fuck sake, it says it right in the fucking story. And you wonder why people call you out all the time. It's because you pull shit like this and then run away.
Sarc reflexively hates all cops. Probability from all his interactions relating to DUI, drunk and disorderly consider, public drunkenness, public ruination (derivative of the public drunkenness), oandhand,isn’t, vagrancy, and shoplifting (liquor stores), welfare fraud, soliciting for prostitution (transit authority men’s room), huffing, and other assorted misdemeanors.
I take it you didn't read Sullum's takedown of Abbott intending to pardon Perry? Apparently, pardoning the person wearing the longer skirt of rape encourages rape.
I didn't need to read it to see his selectiveness. He often writes about how juries come up with bad decisions, but in this case we're supposed to applaud the jury decision and not question it. I read the hit and takes version, didn't need the full length to see he was applying a double standard.
Would you get a second chance if, through your own reckless behavior in your profession, you killed someone?
Doctors and nurses do sometimes kill people and do get second chances for it but only, and this is the important distinction, their errors aren't wantonly reckless and contrary to their own training and the standard of care. When they do violate their own training, they get no more "second chance" than this clown deserves.
If you spray and pray in an apartment building in the middle of the night, I think your judgment has been convincingly shown to be inappropriate for a job in LE. If prospective employers learn you've been fired for embezzlement, you're probably going to have trouble finding work as an accountant even if you weren't convicted. Someone with child porn found on their computer probably shouldn't be working at a daycare center even if they're not convicted of personally molesting any kids. When your one big fuck-up was clearly related to the job you're seeking, I'm not really sure you deserve a second chance.
Here come the Republicans, backing the blue.
Ideas!
So, do you think someone who served a criminal conviction should have a second chance? Do you think someone who got fired, even for cause, should be able to get another job? So, why do you think someone who wasn't convicted, didn't write the warrant application (which you said he did but the story and facts clearly states he didn't) shouldn't have a chance to prove he learned from his mistakes? Or is forgiveness only for those you deem appropriate and for all the others they should be punished for life? Please explain why your thinking isn't close minded or a double standard.
No he doesn’t get a second chance. When a doctor effs up due to incompetence, he doesn’t get a second chance on another patient. When a cop effs up due to incompetence, that incompetence being firing willy-nilly blindly down a dark hallway in an apartment building full of innocent children and people sleeping in the wee hours of a raid, then no he doesn’t get a second chance. They all get fired and go find other jobs that don’t require good decision making under pressure.
It's a miracle that none of the neighbors were killed by rounds haphazardly fired through adjoining apartment walls.
Actually, the doctor does, because it happens all the time. I've seen it more times than I can count. The same with nurses. We all fuck up, big time. And rarely do we ever lose our license. We may be put on probation, but even that requires a huge fuckup. About the only time you actually do lose your license is if it is intentional. Not if it's a mistake. You're talking to someone who has been a nurse since 1997. Thank you.
I am betting if you ask your doctor what their biggest fuck up was, you'd be surprised by their answer. It's probably much worse than you imagine.
Also, statistically, your more likely to be harmed by your doctor than by your cops.
Medical mistakes are the third most likely thing to kill you:
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/study_suggests_medical_errors_now_third_leading_cause_of_death_in_the_us
Yeah, and that's just the really bad ones. More happen, but cause little to no harm, but any have potential harm (part of the education process most implement after you make an error is to have you list all the possible harm the error could have caused. Even if it's just as simple as a Tylenol, but people have died from getting a Tylenol when they shouldn't have so any error is a potentially dangerous but 99% of the time there is little to no long term damage. Like shooting blindly, no one was harmed but the potential was for there to be.
I’m not shocked. While hospitalized at the Spokane Valley hospital last year for an unrelated knee issue, my father suffered a very obvious stroke early one morning. I arrived a few hours later, and quickly pointed this out. I had three nurses an MD, and a PA all tell me that he was just ‘overwhelmed’ (my father was 88 at the time) by the hospital stay and nothing was wrong. Even though he didn’t understand anything said to him and almost completely lost his speech capability. It wasn’t until 7 pm when the same night curse who worked the day before came on shift and realized he was completely different form the night before. That anything was done. Imaging confirmed the stroke.
It was all so obviously incompetent. These people are supposed to catch this shit. And it was really fucking obvious. But no one could be bothered to do anything.
And the fact that doctors aren't much more eager to police their own is a big part of the problem. Doctors usually have to commit multiple egregious errors before they face any serious disciplinary action. Getting rid of the small number of lazy or incompetent "bad apples" would both save lives and reduce the cost of medical care.
No one who needs to "learn" in the first place that blindly blazing away in an apartment building in the middle of the night has any business being a cop.
I agree with those who are troubled that there have been only very minor consequences for those behind the bad warrant, and those who failed to scrutinize it adequately. Police leadership should be aware that police sometimes lie, and that swatting exists and increase their scrutiny of warrants.
I'm picturing something like this.
I'd be curious to know whether this person would be fine with an incompetent fucktard who was fired for cause being rehired to do the exact same job in any other context, like say, an EMT or a doctor or something.
Probably, because in medicine, you will make similar errors. Everyone does sooner or later. Doctors prescribe the wrong medicine and people have bad reactions, that cause harm. EMTs do to. It's why we almost always do after action reports, because we are always trying to improve. Your doctor has made a mistake, I guarantee it. So has your EMT. In the majority of cases it didn't cause lasting harm, but in other cases it has, it's only a problem when they don't learn from those errors. There hasn't been a doctor who hasn't prescribed the wrong medicine, or made a wrong diagnosis. There hasn't been an EMT who hasn't done something they shouldn't in the field or underplayed a serious medical condition because the person is a frequent flyer or something similar. In fact, using your medical analogy, you actually far more likely to be harmed by your doctor, nurse or EMT than by a cop. Based on pure numbers.
I know because I made a recent bone headed med error myself. 30 years as a nurse, and I made a stupid mistake. Luckily, no one was harmed, but I learned from it and even after thirty years with my license (twenty actively practicing medicine) I still could and did make a stupid mistake. And it was largely because I was under stress and way behind and cut a corner. Do I deserve to be labeled as incompetent and barred from nursing, all the times I saved lives to be discounted because of one mistake? All the people I've helped wiped away because I am human? Maybe he hasn't learned, maybe he has, who can judge if we bar him from his chosen profession based upon a single incident? Have you ever made a major error in your job? Did they state you should leave your profession because of that error?
What do you call the person who graduated in last place from medical school? Doctor.
All fair counter points. And no, I've never made a mistake because I'm perfect... just kidding.
I've made mistakes, but the thing is if I fuck up at my job usually the worst case scenario is some paperwork needs to be redone, maybe a schedule slip that could cost the company a good amount of money. Which could still get me fired even though my mistakes won't get anyone killed. I just think as a rule of thumb anyone working in a profession where they could kill someone if they fuck up badly enough - which I believe this guy did - the punishment should be a bit more severe than just getting fired. Especially for cops who have a monopoly on the legal use of deadly force.
I can meet in the middle though, maybe losing his certification for life is a bit harsh, but I think he should at least have it suspended or revoked with the possibility of being reinstated after some amount of time (5 years maybe?). And yes, I think healthcare workers who fuck up and kill patients should have some kind of similar punishment. That may sound harsh to you, being in healthcare yourself, but that's just my opinion. You're free to disagree, of course.
And yes, I think healthcare workers who fuck up and kill patients should have some kind of similar punishment.
To clarify: I'm mainly talking about cases of true negligence. I understand that sometime shit happens in medicine and a mistake that might have normally been relatively minor, through some weird combination of circumstances can lead to someone dying. And obviously negligence would have to be proven and that can be hard to do. I'm not suggesting that someone should lose their livelihood without some kind of due process or over a normally minor human error. I'm not a complete monster, only a partial one.
True negligence, actually any error is usually due to cutting some corner (as in my case recently) which I would term negligence. I think intentional harm (which is extremely rare) is the better solution. I will tell you from my experience, that most nurses are extra careful (same with doctors) after they make a mistake. You do get the ones who don't care but they're rare. I'm not sure what this guy is like. He panicked (as he pretty much admits). He seems to recognize it in his testimony about becoming unaware (with is also something I've seen combat veterans use to describe their reactions to their first firefights too). And we train for that constantly. Far more than cops do. Most cops will never have to draw their guns. They don't train for this. So, I don't necessarily blame him but his training (or lack thereof). We all think we'll be Rambo when the shit hits the fan, but end up being Bligh on Band of Brothers.
He wasn't 'fired with cause'.
He was fired to keep Louisville from being burned to the ground because the mob would never understand that he did nothing wrong in returning fire.
Now for the real elephant in the room: what does the county racial mix or who the majority of them voted for in 2020 have to do with this particular story? Other than the NY Times doing NY Times things?
I caught that too.
Unless there's a hostage situation or a bomb or some other exigent emergency there is absolutely no reason to barge into someone's home in the middle of the night. Cops who get shot doing this should be held entirely responsible for any harm that comes both to them AND to others doing this, because they have created the dangerous situation. You should not be able to escape responsibility by inventing a dangerous situation from whole cloth.
Because criminals are angels and never destroy evidence of their crimes or react with hostility to police.
Where do I start ? There was not a "no knock" warrant. The brass told the officers to execute it as if it were a "no knock", but after arriving at the scene, the officers claimed that they spent several minutes repeatedly announcing themselves and their intention to enter the apartment. Breonna Taylor had not worked as an EMT for over two years. She was, in fact, heavily involved in her former boyfriend's drug business. According to him, she was "holding" $2,000 in cash for him at the time of the raid. After her current boyfriend came into the hall and started shooting at the police who had not even entered the apartment and the officer was wounded, the entire process got interrupted and no search of the apartment was ever carried out, so it was never determined whether or not she did actually have the cash. Taylor had provided a rental car to the previous boyfriend who returned it to her with a dead body in the trunk. She had previously been observed coming and going from the stash house that he used to carry out his sales. To suggest that Taylor was some kind of innocent bystander that got shot is ridiculous. She was an active participant in an ongoing illegal drug enterprise and died as a result. The officers all stated that they announced themselves repeatedly. The whole thing was such a cluster that nobody knows all the details and the sainthood of Breonna Taylor is a myth.
"Myles Cosgrove never faced criminal charges"
So why treat him like he's guilty?
Note: I'm not saying rather or not he learned anything or is going to be a better cop,but I believe in principles. If you argue that everyone deserves a second chance, you can't then turn around and say 'except that guy, fuck him, punish him for life'. I am a free speech and free religious practice proponent, that doesn't mean I can argue that freedom of religion only applies to Christians, but have to say that it includes every religion I disagree with. Have your satanic club, as long as they allow a Christian club, too. I think satanists are sad, wanna be edgy persons seeking attention but fuck, let them. If you want to dress in drag and call yourself Paulina, go for it, but I draw the line when you try to force others to live your lie. Or when you take away opportunities from those who were born a woman, and I totally reject the idea that the science supports your delusions. Because it doesn't really.
Another example of why I left "libertarianism" and Reason.
Ms.Taylor's death is tragic and she was innocent victim but - BUT the police were executing a lawful (if demented & erroneous) order.
For anyone (police or other) to use deadly force lawfully requires that they are not the aggressor, and that there is imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury. Taylor's bf Walker had time to shout at the police, to call his Mom, call 9-11 and to fire a "warning shot" so the argument that he was in imminent peril isn't supportable. Police OTOH were under fire and one was injured - they were in imminent danger of death ...
Walker, fired his pistol through the door at unknown, unidentified ppl. That is a criminal act - assault with a deadly weapon - and it triggered this chain of events. Castle-doctrine only give a presumption of innocence, based on REASONABLENESS, and it falls short of REASONABLE to fire on unobserved, unknown ppl with undetermined intent through an opaque door. Particularly when there isn't an imminent threat.
I police erred to return fire through a door too. That is reckless behavior, even tho they were in imminent danger. Ppl under fire often make poor decisions. As did the police here.
I can't blame these individual police for the POLICY of no-knock searches. A very bad policy which is likely to create conditions for these sorts of errors.
Further I certainly don't expect these policemen/woman should never work again. That's just dumb.
Why does Reason have to be so one-sided ?
Why is it not reasonable to shoot people kicking in your door at whatever in the am ? Multiple witnesses agree police did not announce themselves. What is the normal response to thinking you're about to be axe murdered by someone willing to kick the door in during the wee hours of the morning ?
And why didn't the police attempt to make peaceful contact at least once during normal hours before this whole thing started ? How do you find a way not to blame police who's own department says they didn't do what they were supposed to do , and instead did the opposite of what they were trained to do?
"Ms.Taylor’s death is tragic and she was innocent victim but – BUT the police were executing a lawful (if demented & erroneous) order."
So even if it's demented and WRONG, it's ok if it's "lawful"? Holy cow. You must be the type who think that people must obey the armed goons of the state (aka the "police") at every turn.
the police fired AFTER the idiot in the apartment responded to their knock and announcement by shooting through a door and injuring an officer. THAT is the story that the media always ignores. if he doesnt show breonna doesnt die. period.
"Knock and announcement" - when you start with a lie, you reach wrong conclusions. None of the neighbors heard any announcement. The cops were the aggressors, and the man who fired at them was exercising his right to self defense.
The cops were also incompetent and dangerous. 32 rounds fired and none hit the guy who fired at them.
No, but they did hit the person who was RIGHT NEXT to the shooter. In a dark bedroom.
No sympathy. If you think you can do the job better, put on a badge and do it.
Good. She was a drug-dealing scumbag who fired at cops. I have zero sympathy, and am glad for the cop.