FDA Says Lab-Grown Chicken Is Safe To Eat
"The future of our planet depends on how we feed ourselves…and we have a responsibility to look beyond the horizon for smarter, sustainable ways to eat," says GOOD Meat's CEO.

Lab-grown chicken is closer than ever to hitting American grocery store shelves. GOOD Meat, a company developing "cultivated" meat made from chicken cells, announced on Tuesday that it has received a "no questions" letter from the Food and Drug Administration, meaning that the product has been deemed safe to eat. While this is a major victory for the company—and those who are eager to try so-called "slaughter-free" meat—the product will still need approval from the Department of Agriculture before it can be sold.
"Receiving a 'no questions' letter from the FDA and a subsequent clearance from the USDA will allow GOOD Meat to scale up manufacturing and begin introducing its products to American consumers," said Dan Glickman, GOOD Meat Advisory Board member and former U.S. Secretary of Agriculture. "Just as the United States has been a global leader in modernizing conventional food and agriculture techniques, it too can lead in the emerging alternative protein space. Today's announcement is one such example."
GOOD Meat is owned by Eat Just, a food company known for its plant-based mayo and egg alternatives. The company has already successfully received approval to sell its products in Singapore. If finally approved for U.S. sale, the company has stated that they plan to release their cultivated chicken at a Washington, D.C., restaurant owned and operated by chef José Andrés.
"Since Singapore approved GOOD Meat for sale, we knew this moment was next," said CEO Josh Tetrick in a Tuesday press release. "The future of our planet depends on how we feed ourselves…and we have a responsibility to look beyond the horizon for smarter, sustainable ways to eat."
GOOD Meat—and a few other companies who are developing "lab-grown" meat—create their products by taking a sample of cells from a living chicken, and then submerging choice cells in a tank full of nutrients, causing the cells to grow for several weeks, resulting in a cut of chicken with an "identical nutritional profile," according to GOOD Meat's website.
GOOD Meat isn't alone in creating cultivated meat products. In 2022 the FDA also found that the "lab-grown" chicken created by another company, Upside Foods, was safe for human consumption. That company is also awaiting USDA approval.
While Americans concerned about the environmental or ethical consequences of meat can rejoice at this latest development, not everyone is so happy. Meat industry interest groups have already attempted to halt the success of cultivated meat companies. For example, in 2018, the United States Cattlemen's Association filed a petition with the USDA arguing that "meat" and "beef" should not be able to refer to products "not slaughtered in the traditional manner."
However, despite pushback, it seems that cultivated meat could be coming to American grocery store shelves soon.
"Consumers and future generations deserve the foods they love made more sustainably and in ways that benefit the public good," said Bruce Friedrich, president of the Good Food Institute, a meat alternative think tank, "ways that preserve our land and water, that protect our climate and global health, ways that allow for food security."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"FDA Says Lab-Grown Chicken Is Safe To Eat"
Well that settles that.
I've made $1250 so far this week working online and I'm a full time student. I'm using an online business opportunity I heard about and I'AM made such great money. It's really user friendly and I'm just so happy that I found out about it. Here's what I do, .for more information simply.
Open this link thank you......>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
Trust the science!
100% safe and effective with no downsides!
I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($550 to $750 / hr) online from my laptop. Last month I GOT chek of nearly 85000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, don't have to go OFFICE, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this JOB. I really thanks to my FRIEND who refer me this SITE. I hope you also got what I...go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart......
Click the link↠ http://www.pay.jiosalary.com
Don't be a nugget denier!
Just like the mRNA vaccines!
FDA adds a warning to Covid-19 vaccines about risk of heart inflammation
https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/25/health/fda-covid-vaccine-heart-warning/index.html
Died suddenly!
Safe or not, it isn't chicken.
It's chicken in Reason-land.
Where soybeans and oats give milk and mayonnaise is made out of peas.
Up next, lab grown bat soup.
"The Science Has Spoken"
Hey! If it's anything like Super Chicken, it might be at least interesting to eat.
🙂
Super Chicken Intro
https://youtu.be/_-3QAiVDL-A
organic free-range chicken is safer to eat.
i get paid $550+ per day using my mobile in my part time. Last month i got my 4th paycheck of $17723 and i just do this work in my part time. its an easy and awesome home based job.
Anybody can do this........ http://Www.Smartjob1.com
They don’t care if it’s healthy.
It’s about “sustainability” and other bullshit.
It's arguably not even "sustainability". These people are worried for the chicken's souls.
Reminds me of the Joe Rogan bit about vegetarian cat-owners (paraphrased): "I don't eat meat because it's virtuous. Now excuse me while I feed Fluffy his daily serving of canned murder."
The activists maybe, but the powers that be pushing this shit are simply misanthropes who hate nature, hate you, and want to make life miserable.
If your social credit score is high enough, you get to eat the Frankenstein meat. Otherwise, you eat ze bugs.
Misanthropes, or sadists? I'd say sadists because it's not just people they want to make miserable.
And made from bugs.
All chicken is organic, since it is Carbon-based, and free-range requires more real-estate and pesticides for maintaining food crops and thus is more expensive. Give me cage-fighters any day!
🙂
You know what else is sustainable? Chicken farming
Farmers are problematic for the state.
OTG homesteaders even more so.
At least we didn't get Ron "We need to eliminate ranchers and farmers working animals on the land so that we can return the land to nature so that animals can graze on it." Bailey.
Instead, we got Casually "I make up lies & shit about what others said" Mad-Man!
He's too busy testing all his neighbors and tracking down their contacts
create their products by taking a sample of cells from a living chicken, and then submerging choice cells in a tank full of nutrients, causing the cells to grow for several weeks, resulting in a cut of chicken with an "identical nutritional profile," according to GOOD Meat's website.
I suspect the end result is something similar to mechanically separated chicken, suitable for nuggets and other low-end chicken products but no what most people would think of when they want to buy chicken.
Hopefully, a product in the “protein space” can include some fat.
I use chicken broth quite a bit in cooking. Lab-grown broth would probably be easy to do.
They'd need to grow some bones too for that, I would think.
You wouldn't need the bones specifically, just what the bones contribute to the broth. Fat and collagen I think, mostly, which should be easy to grow in a lab. The flavor would come from the (lab grown) meat and there are already plant-based alternatives to collagen and fat as well.
What you'd end up with might be akin to a vegetable stock, flavored with the artificial chicken meat.
Curiously, at the store they sell beef broth and beef bone broth as separate offerings.
●US Dollar Rain Earns upto $550 to $750 per day by google fantastic job oppertunity provide for our community pepoles who,s already using facebook to earn money 85000$ every month and more through facebook and google new project to create money at home withen few hours.Everybody can get this job now and start earning online by just open this link and then go through instructions to get started..........
SITE. ——>>> http://www.pay.jiosalary.com
It would also be interesting to see, using a different kind of bird, manufactured foie gras.
Trader Joe's used to sell, and now you can buy it via Amazon, a sort of standby "chicken bullion" concentrate that isn't too bad if you need to improvise a quick gravy or extend something.
But calling it "chicken flavored" is a trick of the English language. It's not flavored with chicken, but manufactured to taste sort of like chicken. I suspect that the closest it ever came to a chicken was when someone brought a chicken sandwich into the factory where the yeast was fermenting to make it. Still, in a pinch....
We used to keep some bouillon cubes around. They’re OK, but lately we’ve just been buying cartons of beef, chicken, and vegetarian broth (depending on what we’re making).
My kid also uses the powdered Knorr “Caldo de Tomate con Sabor de Pollo” to make Spanish rice. Just mix it in with the water in the rice cooker.
We already have machines capable of creating realistic chicken meat: chickens.
And now we’ll have two ways to make chicken meat.
What's the second one?
Whatever ungodly process the people in the article came up with.
Clumps of Chicken cells is not chicken meat.
Bingo, n00b
“I suspect the end result is something similar to mechanically separated chicken, suitable for nuggets and other low-end chicken products but no what most people would think of when they want to buy chicken.”
If/When the cost becomes competitive, lab-grown chicken (LGC?) could result in more efficiently-produced ‘buffalo wings.’ But then, according to my taste buds, such “wings” don’t really qualify as chicken, either.
I don't think so, boneless wings are solid muscle, not mechanically separated.
When I said, "don't qualify," I was being sarcastic, and referring to my idea of good "chicken," which does not include lots of sauces, spices, and dips.
Interesting:
According to a law suit filed recently, (at least some) "boneless wings" are actually made from breast meat. I find that kind of funny.
So, it’s a line of chicken cells with an induced cancer that allows it to grow outside of the chicken?
Or perhaps it’s actually "Mrs. Hawkins" from “Methuselah’s Children”?
So dystopian
Open markets. Consumers will decide. The negative is eventual subsidies and requirements from our overlords in the name of climate and sustainability.
I love how the writer suggests that only the meat industry could object to this abomination.
Where do they find these writers?
Pravda
You laugh, but there was a time when margarine had to be packaged with yellow food coloring because butter manufacturers didn't like the otherwise pure white product to look too much like butter.
Have to say it worked. For my whole childhood my parents bought margarine instead of butter, and I always though it was intrinsically yellow, until now.
My mom always told the tale of the margarine coming with the little packet of coloring that you mixed in yourself so that it looked more like butter.
In any event, I grew up eating the stuff. It was only when I started eating in a college dorm that I realized that it was ok to eat butter, it wouldn't kill you, and btw, in my case, I no longer had indigestion two hours after every meal.
Margarine is vile and should be outlawed, seriously. It's a fraud pure and simple.
Hon, you're on a *libertarian* website.
The non-aggression principle should apply when deciding whether something should be "outlawed". A food product? Hell no.
OK, not outlawed, based on libertarian principles, I'll agree.
But claiming that it's a substitute for butter comes close to fraud? Eh..... fool me once, shame on me.......
OK
But it's still vile!
We can agree to disagree of “vile”. I find some fine. Now, the interesting part to me is that the “science” of the time said it was healthier. Should be lesson that science is very often not “settled”.
I won’t eat the stuff. Only real butter for me, too.
Search for “taste”
Not found.
Nor texture. Taste I'm sure is pretty close. Boned, skinless chicken is mostly just neutral protein flavor, especially white meat. But I doubt the texture is going to be anything like actual muscle tissue. And without bones and skin and fatty tissue, it won't make anything like real roast or fried chicken.
I figure its like the mechanically separated chicken used in chicken nuggets.
Unless you're breading it and deep frying it, you can keep the skin. Blech.
Fn racists
Are they safe safe? Or "safe" like vaccines?
I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($550 to $750 / hr) online from my laptop. Last month I GOT chek of nearly 85000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, don't have to go OFFICE, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this JOB. I really thanks to my FRIEND who refer me this SITE. I hope you also got what I...go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart......
Click the link↠ http://www.pay.jiosalary.com
So, not perfectly 10,000% safe.
"FDA Says Lab-Grown Chicken Is Safe To Eat"
They also came out and said that obesity has little to do with diet and exercise, so ya, I dont think they have credibility in this realm anymore...
I'm (probably not exceptional in being) old enough to remember the recommendation to switch from lard to vegetable shortening *and* the subsequent banning of it by the same organization.
Can you provide a cite for whatever you are referring to?
I think I may have heard about that. The "It's not your fault" brigade is blaming obesity on, well, everything but how the person takes care of their body.
Controversial expert is appointed to Biden food panel after claiming that obesity CAN'T be treated with exercise and good diet because it's genetic - will now tell Americans what to eat
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11675875/Gov-panel-tells-Americans-eat-says-look-evidence-equity-lens.html
"'That means if you are born to parents that have obesity, you have a 50 to 85 percent likelihood of having the disease yourself. EVEN WITH OPTIMAL DIET, EXERCISE, sleep habits, stress management."
Correction: I was techincally incorrect, it wasnt FDA, it was USDA and HHS.
Biden should appoint her to the department of energy instead, since these "genetics" allow for energy to be created in violation of the laws the physics it could solve a lot of problems.
I don’t think anyone is talking about violating any rules of energy conservation.
It is absolutely true that one can lose or control their weight by limiting calories. It is basic physics. Losing weight that way is also, quite plainly, using starvation to lose weight.
Many people who are not obese do eat more calories than whatever the minimum intake would be to maintain their weight. Yet they don’t gain weight. The human body is more complex than a calorimeter.
Yes some people can eat more than you burn and not gain weight, but you physically cannot gain weight if you don't eat more than you burn, meaning obesity can *always* be prevented, and weight gain always controlled, by optimal diet and exercise. To claim otherwise (as she did) is to claim mass and/or energy is being created from nothing. Genetics cannot change that.
Weight loss can be different, as some people's body will burn muscle and connective tissue before fat, but they still had to have had suboptimal diet and exercise to gain the weight in the first place, and proper diet and exercise can keep them from gaining more weight.
Fat can also be surgically removed, leaving the only remaining task to maintain weight.
“leaving the only remaining task to maintain weight”
Which is the hardest part of the whole affair. It’s deeply unpleasant to maintain calorie counting as one’s way of keeping weight off for the rest of one’s life. Which is why so many fail to do it.
Ooohh it’s so haaaard.
I think it is also an unfair summary to say she said “obesity has little to do with diet and exercise”. Her actual statement was knowledgeable and much more nuanced.
It’s still a first world problem.
Tell that to all people killed by starvation during the Cultural Revolution in the PRC, Stalin's rule in the USSR, and not to be forgotten, the Nazi's 'jobs for life' program making munitions during WWII.
Starvation and "optimal diet, exercise [...]" aren't really the same thing though, so I'm not sure why you think one is relevant to the other.
Whether starvation or "optimal diet", it's about calorie control, pure and simple. If you eat fewer calories than you burn, you lose weight.
Yes, but there are other, more pleasant, ways to lose weight. Eating a balanced diet, avoiding sugar, avoiding stress.
But your genetics are going to come into play for how easy or hard it is to get below obesity level.
Part of the problem, too, is that obesity is defined in terms of BMI, which is just a terrible way to define it.
BMI is a lousy, zeroeth order approximation at best, distressing to see it still considered for anything other than population-level studies.
Two fatties that adopt kids are also 50 to 85% likely to raise some little porkers.
And optimal diet, exercise, and other life habits are white privilege.
FDA?
A three letter federal agency staffed by the same pool of fascists that inhabit the CDC and NIH?
That FDA?
Messa be thinking mostly no.
So, not just mistaken, not just overreaching, but “fascists”. Drama much?
May I suggest reading a bit of history about Italy and Germany in the thirties?
(Actual history, nothing from the last decade or two)
It is precisely because I am familiar with that history that I don’t trivialize it by comparing minor annoyances such as the FDA to real fascism.
Oh come on! Quarantines and concentration camps are the same thing!
Like this drama? "CEO Josh Tetrick in a Tuesday press release. "The future of our planet depends on how we feed ourselves…and we have a responsibility to look beyond the horizon for smarter, sustainable ways to eat.""
Yes, like that drama, but a mirror image of it.
Dry flavorless white meat powder.
No fat, no texture.
And no flavor because it's not free range, it never ate.
Chickens, cows and pigs and most farm animals eat what humans cannot and turn it into something that humans CAN eat. Meat.
Vat meat is fed with an industrial product, grown in an industrial process and will be fed to industrial drones.
Might as well just eat tofu.
STFU, don’t give them any more ideas.
Tofu and insect meal will be our only options. Except at the Elites’ private parties
You a Malthusian?
Are you being deliberately obtuse, or are you drunk already?
Lab-grown chicken is closer than ever to hitting American grocery store shelves.
No way, dude. Know Your Chicken
What the...
I have a deep knowledge of seriously fucked up music.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQ8ViYIeH04
I thought I did, but you have me beat.
Good stuff actually.
Parts is parts
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
Given the FDA's track record, I'll take this to mean that fake chicken is unsafe to eat.
“Since Singapore approved GOOD Meat for sale, we knew this moment was next,” said CEO Josh Tetrick in a Tuesday press release. “The future of our planet depends on how we feed ourselves…and we have a responsibility to look beyond the horizon for smarter, sustainable ways to eat.”
When will GOOD Meat change their name to Soylent Foods?
How long before we get kosher bacon? One wonders...
I use to have on old/senile/insane co-worker who insisted there was a way to make lobsters kosher.
IANAR, but there are some halachic questions here.
Is the clump of cells equivalent to the animal itself? If it is, then you cannot have kosher bacon. If not, then some authorities, tending to the Reform side, may hold that provided the extracted clump is smaller than a “zayit”, an olive, and so not susceptible to kashrut, it’s ok, others will hold that as the extraction amount is intentional, it does not matter that the amount is smaller. And others will argue that as the cells are too small to be seen without a magnifying glass, and that the nutrient volume is substantially larger than the volume of cells, there is no contamination, and the the development of new cells – the bacon – is from the nutrient, so it is kosher.
Is taking clumps of cells from a live animal for food prohibited under the Noahide Law? One side will argue that it is prohibited, while the other will argue that provided no cruelty is involved, it’s permitted.
I note, too, that when the babirusa was discovered and initially it was suggested that it chewed the cud, the Sephardi Chief Rabbi of Israel said, I refuse to believe in the existence of a kosher pig. I suspect that the sages will say, schmuck, whatever you do to it, it’s still bacon and so it’s treyf.
They had that at Woodstock, and I've seen beef bacon and turkey bacon on my store's shelves. I doubt it tastes the same as the real stuff, but it's there.
Nothing against the idea in principle. But, I don't think I'll be an early adopter. And "the government said it's okay" isn't much of an endorsement.
Only if you've been paying attention.
*looks at article above*
*looks at article beneath*
*wonders why "government says" should mean anything*
Talk about processed food.
The FDA also says high fructose corn syrup is safe to drink.
And eat loads of carbs per the USDA food pyramid, what could go wrong, it was said with the best of intentions.
Also hydrogenated vegetable oils. Yumm.
I'll try it. It can't be worse than the genetically modified trans fat and high fructose corn syrup filled garbage that constitutes the vast majority of the standard American diet.
Very safe, I'm sure.
You go first.
Give it ten years, or more, for testing before it goes to grocery stores. A perfect place to test lab grown meat is the White House kitchen, Senate dining halls, and government cafeterias. For additional testing feed it to prisoners.
... you do know that rich people are the first to test this stuff, right? It's more expensive then traditional meat, and the main selling point is the moral superiority. So like the Impossible/Beyond Burgers before it, it'll be fancy restaurants with rich customers.
Only after being sold like that for a few years will the price drop down low enough to show up at fast food joints (where it'll be more expensive then regular meat, but much closer then before). And a few years after that it'll be available at super markets.
Which is to say... yes. It is very likely that the President and other politicians will try this before anyone posting in this thread will.
Not prisoners though. Too expensive for them.
And a few years after that, it will turn out that there is some new disease, syndrome, deficiency or such that can be traced back to this wonderful new product.
Thankthegawds the FDA never has made a mistake.
*late night television in the future*
“Have you or a loved one eaten lab grown chicken cells? Contact Dewy, Cheetam and Howe to get the compensation you deserve!”
Heck, DC&H have to keep earning a living after the "Camp Lejeune" gambit runs its course.
I imagine there was a similar conversation when some caveman came up with the idea of cooking meat over the fire.
There are lots worse things than laboratory chicken that people KNOW are bad for them and eat anyway.
Bitcoin
Flying cars
Self driving cars
Segway
Train to burbank
Or do what humans have done for centuries with food that’s new. Just eat a little of it, don’t make it your entire diet.
Interesting.
Won't be able to meet their goals unless they can get the price point low enough to compete on that.
And with that thought, gimme a moment while I check an online retailer... huh. With the price of meat what is† it seems that Beyond Burgers/Impossible Burgers are actually competitive with low-fat ground beef now. The cheap 70/30 ground beefs are still cheaper, but the leaner meat-tubes are pretty close to the vegetable-meat.
Interesting.
________
†When you get it. If you get it.
If I want to eat an industrial product, I'll stick to sausage.
Name at least three ways it will probably be more energy intensive to grow a chicken in a lab vs the old fashioned way.
It’s OK as long as it’s done with electricity!
Natural gas to keep it warm?
Antibiotics/irradiation to control contamination?
Preservatives?
This is a cool idea. This skepticism reads like a PETA message board. I think agriculture is a really tough topic for faux-libertarians and really show (in these comments especially!) who are actually just standard republicans.
I certainly won't be a first adopter, but hell, I did the keto diet for like 6 months, I'm certainly not thinking long term.
Uh, no. The comments here are mostly expressions of personal preference and reactions to expected social and government restrictions on food choices. If anything they are the opposite of PETA's holier-than-though moral crusade.
You couldn't be further from reality if you tried. In one comment, you managed to demonstrate you know NOTHING about Republicans, libertarians, PETA, agriculture, or synthetic "meat".
I’m certainly not thinking long term.
That is a GROSS UNDERSTATEMENT.
“Lab grown chicken is safe!”
“Two weeks to stop the spread!”
“The vaccine prevents infection!”
“Masks stop the spread!”
“Trump colluded with Russia!”
Whatever it is this illegitimate monster representing itself as “government “ is selling, I’m not buying.
The government isn’t selling it. A private company is.
In fact, all the government has done is act as a speed bump on a food that is most likely perfectly safe getting to the free market.
Safe AND effective.
So let’s say you’ve got a 500ft x 50ft sheet metal shed in Arkansas built in 1947 full of chickens at about 5 birds/sq ft. Change the sign from “Tyson Farms” to “Tyson Labs”, change out the workers’ coveralls for white lab coats (cheaper) and now it’s literally lab-grown chicken. Slightly different process from that described in the article.
Not sure why the FDA needed to sign off on that, but I’m fine with it.
This is what we call reinventing the wheel.
Where's the fun in that?
I once had someone tell me my leather jacket was murder and that I was responsible for the death of an innocent cow. I politely informed her that it was actually a calfskin jacket, made from a baby cow, which is why it's so much more comfortable. I also informed her this is why veal is so much better than beef.
She did not respond well to the information.
The cuter the animal the more delicious, baby dolfin is tasty
Next, the moral dilemma of poultry based building materials, like Tysonvek.
That's a lot of collagen...
The FDA saying it's ok is of course not persuasive. But then, if the chicken producers themselves say it's ok, would you believe them any further?
Still, I'd be happy to try it, though I'd rather they produce lab-grown tuna.
Is lab-grown chicken safe to choke? Asking for a friend.
I know allot of Hippies here are freaked out about Lab Grown Meat, but the only real problem here is the fact we need FDA Approval to put something to market
Lab grown chicken gain-of-function research has already produced some outstanding Fox TV hists and anchors.
The FDA is so reliable that there are HUNDREDS of lawyers that spend their entire careers EXCLUSIVELY suing pharmaceutical companies over drugs the FDA said were safe.
YOU"RE BEING DELIBERATELY *URP* OBTUSE!
No, they were cawt doing that.