Federal Appeals Court Stops the 'Stop WOKE Act'
The 11th Circuit panel refused to lift an injunction against the law.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit has rejected Florida's request to let it enforce the "Stop WOKE Act"—officially known as the Individual Freedom Act—while the state appeals a lower court ruling that partially enjoined the statute.
Signed into law by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis in April 2022, the law prohibits private employers and university professors from endorsing certain concepts related to race and other categories of identity. The statute drew lawsuits almost immediately. A number of employers and a diversity consultant challenged a provision that says private employers may not require employees to attend a training or activity that promotes any of eight listed concepts.
Chief U.S. District Judge Mark E. Walker, writing for the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee Division, then issued an injunction against enforcing that provision. "Normally, the First Amendment bars the state from burdening speech, while private actors may burden speech freely," Walker wrote. "But in Florida, the First Amendment apparently bars private actors from burdening speech, while the state may burden speech freely."
In November, Walker issued another injunction, this one blocking a similar section of the law that applies to university professors. He accused the state of essentially arguing that "professors enjoy 'academic freedom' so long as they express only those viewpoints of which the State approves," a position Walker described as "positively dystopian."
"The First Amendment does not permit the State of Florida to muzzle its university professors, impose its own orthodoxy of viewpoints, and cast us all into the dark," he concluded.
It is this November injunction the 11th Circuit just left in place.
"Conservatives who cheer on the Florida law should consider what liberal states—or, for that matter, a Democratic-controlled Congress—could do if allowed to engage in similar regulation," Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University, warns at The Volokh Conspiracy. "The same powers that Florida uses to target 'woke' employer speech can just as easily be used against conservative employers."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press except when the left is pushing a woke agenda, then it’s ok; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
+100000000…. lol… “except when the left is pushing a woke agenda”… Well said.
It’s the “The Constitution doesn’t apply to Republicans because they have good intentions” clause.
Oh…. You were serious about adding that part.
Still just another treasonous Nazi-Supporter I see.
*tap tap*
Your sarcometer is broken.
“I was only pretending to be retarded”
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-was-only-pretending-to-be-retarded
Is it religious freedom to hijack higher learning and industry to coerce our citizens to either become indoctrinated or forfeit their careers?
Isn’t it the job of government to make and enforce laws that prevent people from coercing each other?
Religious freedom? You want to massacre the Jews!
That’s quite the imagination.
It’s time for your medication.
You rant and rave about your hatred for Jews all the time! And now you’re denying that?
Prove it.
What I’ve said about Jews is the truth. Truth isn’t hatred.
Refute it.
I don’t have to prove anything. You’re a well k own anti semite Nazi who rants and raves about getting rid of Jews. You likely fantasize about it while you jack it in front of your Nazi shrine (pretty sure you have a Nazi shrine).
You’re thoroughly discredited here after all your Holocaust denial ranting and presenting your fringe ‘evidence’. No kne likes or respects you. So piss off Nazi faggot.
Revert to 1st reply. You see in your partisan-party exception clause you accidentally told the truth about the lefts demanded indoctrination.. Hurry hurry go edit your first comment before it’s too late 🙂
First of all, the State of Florida isn’t “Congress”.
Second, making certain behaviors and speech during working hours a condition of employment is not making a “abridging the freedom of speech”, since professors are free to speak on whatever topics they want on their own time. They just can’t teach it in class on tax payer dollars.
So your position is the first amendment doesn’t apply to States?
Do you think dinosaurs and people co-existed too?
A paid teacher has no right to exercise freedom of speech within their duties. Just like an ice cream parlor can have zero tolerance to employees discussing or displaying anything of a political nature while on duty. Totally LEGAL.
FOR A COURT to tell the government that it has NO RIGHT to MANAGE as is required even in labor relations agreements of private industry is in fact FORCED SPEECH by the court which is another issue entirely. The court is mandating that any teacher be able to say or teach anything they want at any time without recourse and without management oversight. Sorry whatever court this was WILL be overturned.
“The First Amendment does not permit the State of Florida to muzzle its university professors, impose its own orthodoxy of viewpoints, and cast us all into the dark.”
Dude; hello!!!! Where the F do you think Education Requirements are coming from? Is there really any difference between a State Agent of Education created by politicians and politicians themselves?
More ?blessings? of Commie-Education.
DeSantis and ALL Republicans would be very wise to Just ELIMINATE Communism in their State completely. All these Gov-Gangster-Gun battles would just disappear overnight.
Professors at State universities are private actors in performance of their jobs? Does the State have authority to set the minimum standards of what constitutes a well rounded education? Does the State have authority to ban racist academic theories from being taught as truth?
In a discussion I heard over the weekend about the Stanford Law students causing a guest speaker engagement to be canceled, it was mentioned that the humanities courses have some 140 offerings on “queer” subjects. 15 on Christianity. Can the current state of academia be called in Light?
Can the current state of academia be called in Light?
That struck me as well. Ilya Somin, notorious for his inelegant turns of phrase, has said the quiet part out loud. “Casting people into the dark” is a religious argument, (outside literal electricity and light generation) not a legal argument. Justice is blind.
Stanford being a private university, isn’t the best example here. In a market analysis, their offering more “queer” studies than Christian studies indicates that is their customers’ preference.
It was an example of the current state of academia and whether it provides much in the way of enlightenment with its current obsessions.
And it wasn’t the best example because in your previous paragraph you were talking about public universities.
And you are missing my point that the students must be obsessed with the same things because they are paying big money to attend Stanford.
And I am not saying Stanford should be governed by the state. Merely asking if what it is offering add to human knowledge or detract from it in frivolous theorizing at an irrelevant line of inquiry or is divisive and destructive. I mentioned it because of the bizarre focus that I had heard discussed.
“Merely asking if what it is offering add to human knowledge or detract from it in frivolous theorizing at an irrelevant line of inquiry or is divisive and destructive.”
They have to offer something to those students who want to study Christianity. Sure, 15 courses seems to be a bit much but as religion continues to fade into irrelevancy I’m sure that number will drop.
Also, studying esoteric subjects is part of the fun of college. Not every class has to be focused on your degree or career goals. Learning for learning’s sake is a good thing.
Cite? Many of these classes are required gen ed requirements.
One of the most frustrating thing about the commentariat is it’s just the same conversations over and over. I’ll just link to comments from this same conversation three days ago…
Start now earning every month extra $15k or more by just doing very easy and simple online job from home. Last month i have made $17942 from this job just by giving this only 2 hrs a day using my laptop. Everybody can now get this job and start earning more cash online just by follow details here…….OPEN
↠↠↠ Click the link—————————————>>> GOOGLE WORK
Does age stop an argument from being valid?
“One of the most frustrating thing about the commentariat is it’s just the same conversations over and over.”
This coming from the guy who would repeatedly show up in the comments insisting that “Not Masking is a violation of the NAP”, over and over, even after others had refuted this argument.
And saying that medical transitioning for children is not happening, after being shown the proof repeatedly.
Maybe facts don’t change every day.
Maybe just maybe the climate isn’t a cold? nope hot? nope dry? nope wet? OH I KNOW changing!!!! emergency. That just flips on its head day to day whichever way it needs to, to gain GUN-Powers of Dictation.
One of the most frustrating things about the commentariat is reading your posts.
https://reason.com/2023/03/17/christopher-rufo-wants-to-shut-down-activist-academic-departments-heres-why-hes-wrong/?comments=true#comment-9973918
People like Rufos and his supporters are envisioning progressives and socialists being protected by “academic freedom”, but the other side of the coin is, say, Jordan Peterson at the University of Toronto, arguing against C-16.
It isn’t always progressives and socialists protected by academic freedom and tenure.
Peterson’s argument is essentially against the DEI standards compelling agreement. It was also a law forcing speech in interpersonal interactions with penalties.
Yes, and the Reason he didn’t lose his professorship?
Except he is no longer a professor and the law is in effect.
He’s not an *active* professor because he resigned:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jordan_Peterson#Career
“In the fall of 2021, Peterson resigned from the employment of the University of Toronto, becoming professor emeritus. In May 2022, he became chancellor of Ralston College, a liberal arts education project.”
Weird you bring up Peterson.
https://nypost.com/2023/01/05/jordan-peterson-could-lose-psychologist-license-if-he-refuses-social-media-re-education/
but the other side of the coin is, say, Jordan Peterson at the University of Toronto, arguing against C-16.
Odd choice of counterexample, given Peterson’s been essentially kicked out of University of Toronto.
Which gets to the underlying point. Pandora’s Box has essentially been opened. The “it could be you” scenario has been being played out. It’s been “us”. For a while now. If guys like Rufo get their way, progressives will….what? Do what they’ve already been doing for the last decade? The only question is whether the public paying for public institutions have a right to decide on curricula or if that is somehow to be the exclusive province of the academic bureaucracy that it pays for.
“Odd choice of counterexample, given Peterson’s been essentially kicked out of University of Toronto.”
So he resigned, but it’s still the University who’s wrong?
“The only question is whether the public paying for public institutions have a right to decide on curricula”
It seems you only want one part of “the public” making the decisions. The part that agrees with you. The part that has less public support. The part that wallows in grievances and a massive persecution complex.
https://reason.com/2023/03/17/christopher-rufo-wants-to-shut-down-activist-academic-departments-heres-why-hes-wrong/?comments=true#comment-9973960
… it would be reasonable for the Florida legislature to pass a law stating that politically-charged subjects such as CRT not be part of core undergraduate degree requirements — and then leave it at that.
That would be an appropriate response respecting the principle of limited government. But a big part of DeSantis’ and the Florida legislatures M.O. is overreaching again and again in countering progressives.
If we are going to have laws on the books that say it is illegal to create hostile workplaces based on race, then I don’t see a problem with applying that equally and saying you can’t make a workplace hostile to any race- including white men.
Yes, white men have it so tough.
Some do. Or were you just trying to showcase your bigotry?
You’re right, in this instance, per the stopped clock.
Basically, people should harden the fuck up, in the words of a great modern Australian philosopher, but that doesn’t mean that a return to the bad old days where sexual harassment, racial sluts, etc. should be tolerated. There should be some reasonable midway point between then and the hypersensitive now.
Let the grooming continue!
Earn income while simply working online. work from home whenever you want. just for maximum 2 hours a day you can make more than $500 per day online. from this i made $17632 last month in my spare time.
Check info here…………………>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
“Stop WOKE Act”
Still haven’t found that phrase anywhere in the act.
“Yes, but our narrative…”
Incredible quantity of grey boxes on this one.
The article does provide the formal name – but it’s not unusual to use an alternative and sometimes snappier description, cf. “Obamacare” for the “Affordable Care Act”, or “Taft-Hartley” for the “Labor Management Relations Act”.
Did you ever complain when someone referred to Obamacare, saying that the act nowhere contained that term?
We do when it’s a boldface LIE… The Anti-Inflation Act (that does everything in its power to explode inflation)?? WTF???
Oh, the naming of acts that don’t do what they say they will is routine legislative bullshit, but merely giving the act a nickname is a separate matter, and if the intent and consequence of an act is X, it is pretty ridiculous to complain that calling it the X Act is a lie.
We all know that the act is intended to be anti-woke – that’s why DeSantis pushed it in the first place, and why you and many others approve of it. If you don’t like the nickname, we can always find you a convenient single-sex bathroom to cry in.
I simply have been making $20k monthly on social media only for few hours daily.every person will try for this activity. American company is giving us a awesome opportunity for being profitable. i am a university student and working with my laptop for being profitable at home.you may take a look at my aspect of interest .simply click on in this link and vist tabs( home, Media, Tech ) for extra data thank you
↠↠↠ Click the link—————————————>>> GOOGLE WORK
It’s a STOP mandating racist and sexist education bill.
But you are correct; Teaching Racism and Sexism is what WOKE is.
Riiiiight, because until WOKE, there was little to no racism or sexism in the US, says people who were never on the receiving end of either.
Yes; Democrats racist and sexist attitudes have existed forever.
Think DeSantis can get them to STOP or at least keep them from mandating it?
It definitely isn’t abnormal for govna shrike to push leftist narratives and naming conventions.
Obama is perfectly happy with the name “Obamacare”. Are you a racist or just a blasphemer?
The wording is….
Subjecting any individual, as a condition of employment, membership, certification, licensing, credentialing, or passing an examination, to training, instruction, or any other required activity that espouses, promotes, advances, inculcates, or compels such individual to believe any of the following concepts constitutes discrimination based on race, color, sex, or national origin.
Truth is its an anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-ethnicity bill.
Isn’t funny how the left has gaslighted their racist, sexist and nationalist political ideology so well they actually label themselves as against racist, sexist and nationalist ideology. Kind of goes hand in hand with pretending to be for “green” plant life while waging a war on CO2 (what plants use).
Subjecting any individual, as a condition of employment, membership, certification, licensing, credentialing, or passing an examination, to training, instruction, or any other required activity that espouses, promotes, advances, inculcates, or compels such individual to believe any of the following concepts constitutes discrimination based on race, color, sex, or national origin.
Technically speaking that’s not even saying that employers can’t have CRT based “diversity” training, just that they have to allow their employees to opt out and can’t fire them for refusing to take their idiotic ideological indoctrination. Kind of telling that they’re throwing such a hissy fit over it.
Thanks for making it so easy to identify who to place on Mute. Your putting “diversity” in quotation marks was the key.
Yes; thanks.
But I bet you call the Affordable Care Act “Obamacare”, you hypocrite.
Obama claimed the name himself in 2016 dummy.
Where does it say that in the actual statutory language?
Still haven’t found that phrase anywhere in the act.
It doesn’t call it the Stop WOKE Act anywhere in the law, as far as I know. But unlike “Don’t Say Gay”, it was actually its supporters that nicknamed it Stop WOKE (Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees). After all, Florida is the place where woke comes to die, according to Ron DeSantis. It is the right that is obsessed with using that word.
“Still haven’t found that phrase anywhere in the act.”
I’ll let Ron DeSantis’ press release educate you:
https://www.flgov.com/2021/12/15/governor-desantis-announces-legislative-proposal-to-stop-w-o-k-e-activism-and-critical-race-theory-in-schools-and-corporations/
It is literally called the Stop W.O.K.E Act (now law, I guess).
“Stop WOKE Act—officially known as the Individual Freedom Act”
Oh good, just a normal ass name. Great. But…wait a minute.
“In 2022, with the support of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, the Florida state legislature adopted a law known as the “Stop W.O.K.E. Act.,” the acronym standing for “Wrongs to our Kids and Employees.””
Ahhh, son of a bitch. These idiots really can’t help but play with their acronyms. Even worse, this time they were lazy and didn’t even come up with a way to use the word “stop.” At least stand by your convictions and predilections.
Hmm…. S.W.O.K.E.A.? Sounds like cheap Swedish furniture…
“Conservatives who cheer on the Florida law should consider what liberal states—or, for that matter, a Democratic-controlled Congress—could do if allowed to engage in similar regulation,” Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University, warns at The Volokh Conspiracy. “The same powers that Florida uses to target ‘woke’ employer speech can just as easily be used against conservative employers.”
OH NOEZ! They’ll cut state funding for private institutions that teach a fundamentalist socio-political agenda! Tranny-heaven forfend!
There seems to be a rather deliberate misportrayal here consistent along Reasons usual lines. In the text of the bill: Ctrl-f “crime”: 0 results Ctrl-f “criminal”: 0 results Ctrl-f “punish”: 0 results Ctrl-f “fine”: 4 results & Ctrl-f “define”: 4 results
This is a fundamentally oppressive, theological, racist inversion of Tennessee v. Scopes. Notably: Ctrl-f “compels such individual to believe”: 3 results. (4 with “compels such student or employee to believe”) Ctrl-f “used to indoctrinate students”: 4 results.
This isn’t a law against speech any more than the CRA is a law against free speech specifically. It’s the other side of an anti-establishment clause law every bit as much as the Scopes decision was an anti-establishment clause decision.
Because taking is not the same thing as not giving, a truly speech-neutral government should neither fine teachers for teaching a certain curriculum, nor should it fund them for the same. Being compelled to give, the least amount of giving that produces the most broadly beneficial returns in terms of liberty should be preferred. One is more free when able to read and perform the math necessary for basic fiscal function than when they are able to “understand” some members of either gender can become the other based on nonsense/non-falsifiable, contemporary, theoretical constructs. Don’t like it, start your own trans University, there’s nothing, stopping you. No Federal DOJ/FBI targeting parents, no Conservative shadow bans, no MCC codes to track institutions participating in such education… as long as you aren’t abusing those without agency, be they minor or minority (nationally, regionally, or specific to the consumer demographic), there’s no issue.
Reason’s take is an authoritarian inversion of classical liberalism and a pretty stupid hill to take a kill-the-republic-or-die position on.
In the text of the bill:
Ctrl-f “crime”: 0 results
Ctrl-f “criminal”: 0 results
Ctrl-f “punish”: 0 results
Ctrl-f “fine”: 4 results & Ctrl-f “define”: 4 results
…
Ctrl-f “compels such individual to believe”: 3 results. (4 with “compels such student or employee to believe”)
Ctrl-f “used to indoctrinate students”: 4 results.
I am making $165 an hour working from home. i was greatly surprised at the same time as my neighbour advised me she changed into averaging $ninety five however I see the way it works now. I experience masses freedom now that i’m my non-public boss. that is what I do……
↠↠↠ Click the link—————————————>>> GOOGLE WORK
Ctrl-f “public”: 22 results.
Ctrl-f “private”: 0 results.
“Conservatives who cheer on the Florida law should consider what liberal states—or, for that matter, a Democratic-controlled Congress—could do if allowed to engage in similar regulation,” Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University, warns at The Volokh Conspiracy. “The same powers that Florida uses to target ‘woke’ employer speech can just as easily be used against conservative employers.”
As if they aren’t already? Someone apparently hasn’t been to diversity training lately.
Yup. The CRA already broadly prevents you, criminally with fines and punishment, from requiring specific faith- or race-based education as a term of employment. Either the CRA is out and Christian bakers are free to hire only Christian employees and refuse service to anyone they please or it’s in and this is an above-aboard refusal of payment for discriminatory treatment.
Agreed; it’s long since time to use the tools to do the job. As you stated, those tools have long been used against Conservatives and Libertarians.
>>just as easily be used against conservative employers
struggling to find the example of conservative tyranny in the workplace.
Forsaking Christmas to be moralistic oppressors no less!
any flexibility there?
I remember reading about this case a couple years ago.
And you don’t remember the Hobby Lobby Supreme Court case? Or Little Sisters? Employers finding reasons to push their religious beliefs on their employees wasn’t anything new, either.
Reminds me of the media saying ‘Trumps Whitehouse ALSO tried to influence Twitter! See, they BOTH did it!’
All while ignoring that Twitter basically only acted uni-directionally. It’s gaslighting.
commies everywhere celebrating
I am making $165 an hour working from home. i was greatly surprised at the same time as my neighbour advised me she changed into averaging $ninety five however I see the way it works now. I experience masses freedom now that i’m my non-public boss. that is what I do……
↠↠↠ Click the link—————————————>>> GOOGLE WORK
Certainly explains David and Ilya.
I’m guessing this judge also believes PBS’s messaging is “freer” because public money is used to fund it.
“Conservatives who cheer on the Florida law should consider what liberal states—or, for that matter, a Democratic-controlled Congress—could do if allowed to engage in similar regulation,”
This is an absurd concern. They already do control all this. They are dancing over a scorched earth victory right now. They are pushing the worst lunacy imaginable on kids while parents are powerless to stop it.
There is no “it could get worse if liberals did the same” scenario.
There is no “it could get worse if liberals did the same” scenario.
Yep, they’ve already done it.
And, given they’ve already done it, not allowing others to respond in kind is the move that encourages it. If progressives can do this with impunity, there’s no disincentive to continuing to do it.
The only option left is the nuclear option. Stop public funding for higher ed.
Agreed it’s already been here a while.
Let’s hope you Goebbels disciples soon (physically) receive the justice your malicious, repugnant totalitarian simping deserves.
No justice?
No peace.
No mercy.
https://twitter.com/martyrmade/status/1637842905720311809?t=dGNeokcJHqcssTsUloSbmg&s=19
One of the uglier aspects of the Civil War was that men of means in the North were able to purchase an exemption while the Union imported armies of foreigners to fight their Southern countrymen for them, signing up recent and new immigrants en masse, often right off the docks.
Yes, as some have pointed out, the South had service referrals for prominent citizens as well, but that wasn’t really my point, which was that it strikes me as mercenary and dishonorable to import legions of foreigners to fight a civil war you started.
About half of all a Union soldiers were either immigrants or the children of recent immigrants. That is, half of the army Lincoln sent to attack the grandsons of the American Revolution weren’t even here when it happened, and had no stake in the long-running North-South conflict.
War is a racket. Always has been.
Platitudes are unproductive
I consider it a must read
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Is_a_Racket
About half of all a Union soldiers were either immigrants or the children of recent immigrants.
I think you’ve undersold the fact that, given imaginary lines on a map at the time, most of these immigrants were trans-Atlantic immigrants and, much like the “imaginary lines” advocates and their cohort like to obfuscate between “indentured servant” and “slave”, the exact same corrosion trivializes the border between “mercenary” and “slave” or “conscript” as well (if not more so).
Are you fuckers still obsessed with the Civil War? You lost get over it.
I just wish that reconstruction had lasted another century.
One of the purposes of that system was to raise money for the war effort without raising general taxes. It was also considered something of a traditional right. Interestingly, getting rid of that system made it more difficult on average for lower class people to get out of the draft. Many communities had money pooled to get working class men out of the draft. Also, immigrants were actually underrepresented in the Union Army relative to percent of the population in draft age cohorts.
Been recently listening to an audio book on the Civil War that had a chapter on that issue.
https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1637853722188345345?t=77wx91_U93zpUeP0lObfYQ&s=19
Woke AI is not allowed to criticize gay marriage but is allowed to criticize straight marriage. This is Queer Theory. Its goal is critical consciousness, aka Woke cult belief and practice.
[Pic]
It’s a good thing that your kids have AI to teach them, instead of relying on the biblical bullshit you cram down their throats.
Yeah, it’s still 1992 and it’s the Moral Majority trying to indoctrinate and not GLAAD’s 93 Gender Warriors.
Applying to private employers does go too far. But it is interesting to see the people complaining admit that they do want to impose racist training on people.
I have trouble getting my knickers in a twist when this is essentially a spin on the Civil Rights Act. Your workplace cannot compel employees to consume racist views.
Don’t get me wrong. I think the Civil Rights Act is also a violation of liberty and the free association of individuals. And if you aren’t going to call that out and explain why the Stop WOKE Act is worthy of condemnation, while a similar law on the books is not, then this argument strikes me as being more about principals than principles. But YMMV.
Applying to private employers does go too far.
Only if the CRA goes too far. Otherwise, businesses open to the public haven’t been able to discriminate on these tenets one way or the other for quite some time and to much greater lengths. This is well behind the line of California mandating that boards be composed of some percentage of women and the law being struck down.
Reason and others are willfully and intentionally obfuscating to say that “Do not discriminate.” means “Negative discrimination is bad, but positive discrimination is good. Passive discrimination of a certain socio-political type cannot be tolerated even in private, but active discrimination of another socio-political type is good and should be encouraged publicly and privately.”
A setback for the fascists. Nice to see every once in a while. Well, all the time but we can’t be that lucky now can we.
It’s a win for identity marxism.
“A setback for the fascists.”
No, you don’t understand, Tony. It helps you guys. It’s not a setback.
The law strikes a blow against democrats, and therefore fascists. But don’t worry, it will all get straightened out soon.
Glad to see you’re 0 – 200,000,000 on what a fascist is.
“Conservatives who cheer on the Florida law should consider what liberal states—or, for that matter, a Democratic-controlled Congress—could do if allowed to engage in similar regulation,”
Yes, they could demand that every government decision be based on equity.
Oh, wait…
I am making ????150 every hour by working on the web at home. A month ago I have gotten $19723 from this activity. This activity is exceptionally astounding and its normal income for me is superior to anything my past office work. This activity is for all and everyone can without much of a stretch join this correct now by utilize this link.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://salarycash710.blogspot.com/
End all public funding of education (or at the least direct funding to schools). Problem solved.
What percentage of Florida university’s annual funding comes from taxes? There are assumptions being made about it.
Is there a sweet spot where it’s totally okay to publicly fund universities without government oversight? 10% or so?
Mere government oversight and ideological micromanagement are different things.
In 2021, 5.7 billion from state and local vs 1.5 from tuition.
What about endowments and other income?
Untaxed endowments?
Almost all of it is backed by federally backed loans dumbass.
Conservatives who cheer on the Florida law should consider what liberal states—or, for that matter, a Democratic-controlled Congress—could do if allowed to engage in similar regulation,” Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University, warns at The Volokh Conspiracy.
I absolutely agree with Ilya Somin here. I just wanted to state that first.
However, there is nothing stopping Republicans from taking over so-called ‘private’ companies and ordering them to restrict speech by proxy and we can say this because it’s already been done. They could also use Title 9 and other rules for colleges to do just about anything regardless of it’s impact on free speech.
What’s going on here is that you can’t use the law to accomplish those goals but you [i]can[/i] use the administrative state as a backdoor to get to the same end goal.
The only thing really stopping conservatives on that front is that, well, they aren’t terribly popular and the administrative state is actively hostile to their goals. Some might say that’s a good thing, and in a way perhaps it is, but allowing only one side to get away with it is a ratchet that turns one direction.
Begin now earning every month an extra amount of $17k or more just by doing very simple and easy online job from home. I have received $18953 in my last month direct in my bank acc by doing this easy home base job just in my part time for 2 hrs maximum a day online. Even a child can now do this job and earns money online. Everybody can get this home job right now and start earning dollars online by follow details here……….
Click the link—————————————>>> http://WWW.Pay.JioSalary.COM
the schools are ALREADY fully controlled by the administrative state. The curricula are defined and mandated and restricted and enforced by the administrative state. The budgets are approved by the administrative state. the DEI goals are fundamental to the entire administration of the public university, from the governor on down to the woke blue-haired goth chick working the counter at the student union.
DIE is inherently anti liberty. Based on that alone its destruction is allowed in the Declaration of Independence which supersedes the constitution. The States created the Federal Govt, high time they removed it from tyranny.
Unless the speech is written on a cake, then you can mandate the h*** out of it.
No one was asking a baker to write any message on a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. They just wanted to the same kind of wedding cake that he would have made for a straight couple.
Wrong, but I also don’t care, no reason to compel someone to do something they don’t want, particularly when it comes to products you sell to customers. I wish people could be as racist and bigoted as they wanted with their businesses so I’d know where not to shop (though the other side is fast becoming just as shrill and unappealing).
The left already does impose these rules. They think that killing babies and a man busting in another man’s bunghole are holy grails.
Yawn. 3 of 11 judges denied motion to vacate a stay, pending appeal, i.e. after one inning of play, the score stands Groomers 1, Lincolns 0.
Speaking of grooming maybe they should look into this:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/20664989/kids-taken-hooters-trolled-bar-twitter/
Taking your kid to pose with bimbos in short shorts or watch a tranny strip show are both bad ideas, Mike.
Just because some trashy chav does the former, it doesn’t excuse you for doing the latter.
Can’t read what’s written behind the gray box but, again, the issue is actually the opposite of just “But there are women in the workplace!”. The issue is that if a woman in the workplace doesn’t want to share the bathroom stall she’s currently occupying with a man, the company can’t compel her to take transgender sensitivity training or fire her for not doing so.
Were the waitresses simulating sex acts?
Earn income while simply working online. work from home whenever you want. just for maximum 2 hours a day you can make more than $500 per day online. from this i made $17632 last month in my spare time.
Check info here…………………>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
DeSantis is wrong in trying to ban Wokeism. There’s a much better and completely constitutional way to deal with this problem.
If a speaker at a state college, any speaker whether it’s Ibrim X Kendi or Charles Murray, is shouted down by students, all funds to the university are immediately halted until the students responsible are expelled and the professors helping them are fired.
This is completely non-ideological, it is punishment for a vicious act. In some cases, such as the woman who ended up with brain damage when she tried to let Murray speak at a college, then it is a criminal act.
The real crime is using extorted taxpayer money to finance university censorship and that cannot be allowed.
This incident was horrible enough that you don’t need to exaggerate the extent of the professor’s injuries. A concussion can be very serious, but “brain damage” is almost always used to describe permanent and significant cognitive impairment.
ban Wokeism
You’re drinking Reason’s koolaid. You’ll still be able to hire surgeons to perform mastectomies and evangelist race baiters will still be free to preach to their flock. What’s being banned is that every employee in the hospital be required to commit to the full troon *and* race baiting agenda as policy and/or condition of employment. Same as any other class in the CRA: a company can hire only women to work in a women’s lingerie store, it just can’t discriminate against men as policy (and, even at that, there’s SCOTUS precedence where recruiting for a heterosexual or all-white softball league is verboten but, disparately, recruiting for an all-black or homosexual league is protected).
If a speaker at a state college, any speaker whether it’s Ibrim X Kendi or Charles Murray, is shouted down by students, all funds to the university are immediately halted until the students responsible are expelled and the professors helping them are fired.
That’s essentially what DeSantis is doing. Funded schools must comply with State guidelines or lose funding, just like with Title IX. DeSantis is merely updating the guidelines, as done endlessly prior, via the proper channels.
Barring complete defunding of Universities and a repeal of the CRA, DeSantis is acting entirely within the letter and spirit of the law (and, it should be noted, in a manner less oppressive than what you’re suggesting as all funds aren’t necessarily cut and expulsions/firings are not an intrinsic part of remediation).
Corporations today impose DIE ideology training and have political commissars in every department. When it comes to liberty there is only victory by destroying wokism everywhere. Starting with tax payer funded institutions like academia. The judge is wrong. Or is it time to ban political indoctrination from private companies?
One man, Mark E. Walker a woke Obama appointee stopped the Stop the Woke act. I doubt it is over.
On February 16, 2012, President Barack Obama nominated Walker to serve as district judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida.
Woke is black vernacular for enlightened.
Republicans are using the law to try to erase black people and intelligence from society, because they know they can’t win elections if they stick around.
Begin now earning every month an extra amount of $17k or more just by doing very simple and easy online job from home. I have received $18953 in my last month direct in my bank acc by doing this easy home base job just in my part time for 2 hrs maximum a day online. Even a child can now do this job and earns money online. Everybody can get this home job right now and start earning dollars online by follow details here……….
↠↠↠ Click the link—————————————>>> GOOGLE WORK
Hahahahahahahahahaha
Oh man, another classic.
Hahahahahahahahahaha
The state isn’t limiting their free speech, it is telling them how to carry out their job, same way any employer is telling its employees how to do their jobs.
Furthermore, there is no legal punishment for violating those rules, it is simply that if people don’t perform their jobs as instructed, they need to seek employment elsewhere.
This nonsense isn’t going to be tolerated by SCOTUS.
Existing Supreme Court precedent recognizes academic freedom as part of the guarantee of Free Speech protected by the First Amendment. This conservative court clearly isn’t afraid to overturn precedent, but it remains to be seen if the will do away with the protections of academic freedom college faculty currently enjoy.
Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the First Amendment rights of public employees. Richard Ceballos was a deputy district attorney for Los Angeles County, California, who claimed that he was retaliated against for speaking out against a police officer’s affidavit in support of a search warrant. Ceballos claimed that the affidavit contained false information that could have led to a wrongful conviction.
Ceballos filed a lawsuit against his employer, the County of Los Angeles, claiming that his First Amendment rights were violated when he was punished for speaking out on a matter of public concern. The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, ruled against Ceballos and held that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made in the course of their official duties.
The Court reasoned that when public employees speak as part of their job responsibilities, their speech is not protected by the First Amendment because it is considered to be “government speech” rather than “citizen speech.” The Court stated that the government has a legitimate interest in controlling its own message and that it would be disruptive to allow public employees to challenge their supervisors’ decisions in court.
The decision in Garcetti v. Ceballos has had significant implications for academic freedom because it has been interpreted to mean that professors and other public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made in the course of their official duties.
Keeton v. Anderson-Wiley (2010): In this case, a graduate student in a counseling program at Augusta State University in Georgia was required to complete a remediation plan to address her views on homosexuality. The student sued the university, arguing that the remediation plan violated her First Amendment rights. The court ruled in favor of the university, stating that the school’s interest in teaching effective, ethical counseling practices outweighed the student’s free speech rights.
Ward v. Polite (2012): A graduate student in a counseling program at Eastern Michigan University refused to counsel a homosexual client as part of her training, citing her religious beliefs. The university disciplined the student for violating the American Counseling Association’s code of ethics, and the student sued the university, alleging a violation of her First Amendment rights. The court ruled in favor of the student, finding that the university had not applied its policies in a neutral manner.
Evans-Marshall v. Board of Education of the Tipp City Exempted Village School District (2010): A high school English teacher alleged that the school district violated her First Amendment rights by retaliating against her for the controversial literature she assigned to her students. The court ruled against the teacher, finding that the school district had the authority to control the curriculum and that the teacher’s assignments were part of her official duties.
Right now, free speech decisions on professors at public universities are governed by the Pickering test. This is a subjective test and has no basis in the Constitution and it may get thrown out just like Roe v. Wade, for the same reasons.
The constitutionally sound position is that public employers, like private employers, should have the same ability to fire employees for their speech. Firing an employee is not “making a law limiting the exercise of free speech” in any rational sense.
Commies unite in defiance of laws which might limit their ability to indoctrinate and groom children!
The way Gov-Gangster-Guns ?teach? in the USA….
…because only Gov —> Guns can teach…./s
The many ?blessings? of Commie-Education.
Teachers should not be doing that either, though AFAIC the reason for laws that purport to protect (white) children from being upset are really to protect their parents and grandparents from being asked inconvenient questions by these kids, you know, like German kids asking their parents and grandparents, “what did you do in the war?”
I much prefer “Gold Guns Girls” to “Guv Gangster Guns.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMyYwL3NZ-k
USA patriots (Republicans) have nothing to be ashamed of.
It was the US Constitution that ended slavery and it was the Left (the WOKE) party that insisted it continue as it the party continues to push for more STOLEN labors endlessly even to the day.
“the reason for laws that purport to protect (white) children from being upset are really to protect their parents and grandparents from being asked inconvenient questions by these kids,”
You are very good at making up bullshit.
For the record, these kids aren’t asking inconvenient questions. They are being forced to perform assignments like “explain how your white privilege gives you an unfair advantage over other children in your class.” “Explain how capitalism excludes your culture from participating” (the one that my hispanic daughter was required to perform last semester).
You should move to south Africa. They have crt in their constitution
You think those 200 year old grandparents or 150 year old parents have some slavery skeletons in there closets? FFS it was the British who established slavery in the English colonies. Better dig deep into your pockets, Limey Shrike, you got a lot or reparations to pay back.
Considering no one with elementary age kids was involved in either world war, let alone the civil war, or even Jim Crow for that matter, this assertion is fucking retarded.
Why in the meantime? Do it now. With how the Marxist Unionists acted during the pandemic, now is the time, parents are pissed.
Readin’, ‘rightin and ‘rithmathic replaced by racist, Racist, RACIST!
No, you lying POS. That is not what I said. “Inconvenient questions” in a US context might be, “why were you spitting and screaming at a black kid going to school?” “Why didn’t you mind about segregated lunch counters?” “Why did you tolerate blacks having to sit in the back of the bus?” or worse.
In “Devil in the Grove”, Blackmun reportedly says to his attorneys, if your client gets life [for rape, etc], it shows that you persuaded the jury that he was innocent, because if they’d thought he was guilty they’d have gone for the death penalty”. What kind of society tolerates a situation like that? And do you think that the people still alive from that time want to get asked questions by their grandkids about it?
It was the US Constitution that ended slavery
Strictly speaking, it was an amendment to the Constitution, the FFs not seeing fit to prohibit it, and then slavery wasn’t truly ended until WWII, and possibly even after as there were reports of slaves in rural Louisiana into the 50s.
it was the Left (the WOKE) party that insisted it continue
Er, no., It was the Southern Democrats, who were neither leftists nor woke.
Oh, I have no doubt that some teachers are doing that, for which they should be reprimanded. But is that the extent of the legislation? Nope. It protects white fragility.
They don’t, you stupid fucking cunt.
They are going home and asking questions that make them feel uncomfortable because it teaches ACTUAL history on what actually happened. It just happend to be white people being racist bastards in that time period.
Share a pool? Hell no, let’s drain it so nobody can use it. Kid goes home and asks his parents/grandparents “Why did they do this? Did you guys know?”
Completely relevant questions to ask. But of course, stupid knuckle dragging fucktards like yourself are incapable of seeing history for what it is, because it hurts your fragile ego. Nobody is saying YOU did it, but your reaction reeks of somebody who still might hold some of those values.
That’s why the Nazi comparison was made. Get an education and stop chronically masturbating you non-contributing product sponge cunt.
Strictly speaking, an Amendment to a Constitution becomes a part of that Constitution, no less than any other part of that Constitution. It is how Constitutions work. They aren’t frozen in time forever as memorials to long-dead public figures.
Healthcare Slaves, Stimulus Slaves, Green-Energy Slaves, Commie-Education Slaves … The Slavery intentions are embedded in the Democratic platform. [WE] identity-affiliated GUN toting mobs will go get us some slaves … because YOU don’t own YOU; [WE] own you!
Us ‘poor’ (or X-Identity Camp) Slavers will use Guns to STEAL from ‘you’ working with Gov-Guns to supply us our *entitlements*. Call me a liar.
The left has literally indoctrinated a massive population into believing that they aren’t EXACTLY what they are. Just like they did when you ran around PROJECTING the Republicans were Nazi’s while simultaneously and pridefully pushing for [Na]tional So[zi]alism. The left is a lying, deceptive, manipulative salesman; selling a pile of trash governing system and proclaiming it’s better than a USA (US Constitution).. It’s NOT “save our Democracy” it’s “save our Constitutional Republic”. The USA is not a Democracy.
And are now republicans.
“We’re just teaching racism in history now” is a top tier canard.
I learned that shit in the mid 80s. By the early 90s it was absolutely fucking shrill.
“Learn some history”
Even this sorry fucking excuse for a magazine knows the 1619 project is shit history.
My wife teaches middle schoolers who didn’t know there were black people who weren’t slaves and there were white people who were.
And Why should elementary schoolers be taught the world can be sucky and their country is evil, again? There’s time enough for the complexities of life down the road.
Mistake on socks shrike?
Lol. They’ve been telling people like you that the climate apocalypse is nigh upon us for decades, and you believe them.
They told you a dude can be a chick for a decade, and you believe that.
They told you that the rona came from poor Chinese peasants bartering in bat soup, and you believe them. (Totally not racist, by the way).
The same people want you on high alert for vanishing white supremacists. They do not want us all to get along.
I can see why you’re so salty tho, vizzy. You’re a gullible rube.
Haha. What a doosh.
https://twitter.com/MythinformedMKE/status/1637973703815299072?t=OzolSyBPIb2DzOgybcDNjA&s=19
Eric Nykamp is a therapist, adjunct professor, & “Anti-Racist” educator.
He asserts that being Woke is best understood as a religious duty.
He continues in his lecture, asserting that racism is like original sin. You’ll always be racist. You’ll be racist until the day you die.
“Does anyone stop sinning? Racism is sin.”
And the kicker: Stage 6, the final stage of so-called “anti-racism” …. is HEAVEN. He actually says it’s heaven. It’s a cult religion.
[Video]
“It’s like you’ve been discipled, and you’re gonna go out, like Jesus sent out the disciples 2 by 2.”
You ready to sacrifice your life for your resentful and malevolent beliefs, Vizzy?
It’s long past time to put it to the test.
Define white fragility shrike.
He means learn to be guilty from history you unwise person.
I find it amusing the biggest defenders of CRT are advocating for segregation.
+1000000 Well put together.
Motivation to be contradictory & retarded ….
[WE] identity-affiliation ‘Gang’ building to get Gov-Guns that STEAL for them. The very curse in Democratic Communist and Socialist societies. No US Constitution of principles. Just endless gangland politics of identity-affiliation gangs who pack ‘guns’ against those ‘icky’ people.
It’s a repeating history of every communist and socialist regime.
True. But of course the US constitution didn’t end slavery anyway.
It’s NOT “save our Democracy” it’s “save our Constitutional Republic”. The USA is not a Democracy.
The hallmark of the political illiterate. “The US is a republic, not a democracy”. Only the ignorant can utter such crap.
The US is not a direct democracy. It is an indirect, or representative, democracy. People vote for representatives in Congress. That is what makes the US a democracy, like so many other western countries.
A republic is where sovereignty is vested in the people, unlike a monarchy. Hence, like say France or Italy or Germany, the U:S is both a republic and a representative democracy, whereas places like UK, Belgium, Netherlands, etc. are constitutional monarchies where sovereignty is technically vested in a king or queen, but are also indirect democracies.
Fuck off, you lying POS. I’m still not shrike and by now have proved it. But you cunts are apparently too stupid or dishonest – or both.
White fragility is where crackers like you and R Mac are so shit scared that they will lose their privilege that anything which remotely suggests that that privilege may be impacted, or that they are not rulers of the US by right, or that the history of the US as taught is inaccurate, must be covered up or concealed to protect their feelings, the poor dears.
A lying POS writes: (lies)
That’s not what I said.
You’re lying again. You didn’t quote what I said exactly. I guess you can’t help yourself.
Another fuckwit enters the convo. We’re talking about the US in the 1950s and early 1960s, not just pre-Civil War. And so what about what the British did in the 1600s and 1700s? My ancestors were living in shtetls in Eastern Europe.
Did you actually read that article? He wanted to make an employee take off her mask that was recovering from pneumonia and under a doctor’s orders to wear a mask in public. Why is it any of his business if his employees want to wear a mask? It was never about freedom, apparently.
And no employer ever has to pay for abortions that aren’t medically necessary. (By providing health insurance to employees, as I am fairly certain that health insurance plans don’t ever cover elective abortions.) The Hobby Lobby owner was arguing that emergency contraception could prevent implantation and thus counted as abortion, but that is playing with the definition of abortion and there is no certainty that they can actually do that, anyway. The Little Sisters case was about all contraception, and not abortion at all. They were never going to be required to pay for health insurance that would cover contraception. They were offered to simply put in writing that they had religious objections and then the employees would get contraceptives covered at no cost to the Little Sisters. That still wasn’t good enough for them, as they would still be “implicated in sin” since filling out a form would lead to employees getting birth control paid for by a separate insurance rider. I got the impression that they would have argued that an employee using their paycheck to pay for birth control would have tied them to the “sin” if they thought anyone would accept that, and that the employee shouldn’t be allowed to use birth control at all.
“The US is not a direct democracy. It is an indirect, or representative, democracy.”
WRONG again; Congress utilizes a tiny and varying degrees of democracy for ENUMERATED POWERS within the instruction of the Supreme Law.
It is a CONSTITUTIONAL Republic; NOT a Democracy. And your *pretending* some other form of government in this nation is exactly why it’s going to sh*t.
LMAO… White privilege…..
The Secretary of Education, with the advice of the Board of Advisors, shall supervise the annual development of a Federal program designed to achieve an increase in the participation by historically Black colleges and universities in federally sponsored programs.
Where’s our historically White colleges and universities in federally sponsored programs????? Huh?
UR so full of racist sh*t. “Entitle my race! Entitle my race! Hate on that other color so my color will get entitlements!!!” — The racist [WE] identity-affiliation “Democracy” gang out Gov-Gangster-Gunning for racist entitlements against those ‘icky’ other-color people.
Then there’s the Republicans; To ensure Individual Liberty and Justice for all.
My point is that I’ve only ever seen people use the term “brain damage” in reference to permanent injuries to the brain. I didn’t say that a concussion isn’t a Brian injury. I’ve never had one myself, but I did receive training on recognizing the signs of a possible concussion when I coached HS golf. I have sufficient understanding of the dangers of concussions to stand by what I’ve said. (All coaches had to go through that training every 2 years, just like for CPR. Really, heat stroke was more of a concern for me, as golf season is in August and September in Florida.)
Begin now earning every month an extra amount of $17k or more just by doing very simple and easy online job from home. I have received $18953 in my last month direct in my bank acc by doing this easy home base job just in my part time for 2 hrs maximum a day online. Even a child can now do this job and earns money online. Everybody can get this home job right now and start earning dollars online by follow details here……….
↠↠↠ Click the link—————————————>>> GOOGLE WORK
How do representatives in the legislatures of our republic get chosen? And chief executives? How was the Constitution that limits government power put in place. Only those, like you, that go out of their way to find something pedantic to argue about would see the word democracy and not accept that it means citizens voting on things, like everything I just asked about.
The just powers of government are derived from the consent of the governed. That is the core concept that anyone that refers to the U.S. being a democracy is expressing.
Uh, our historically white colleges and universities are basically all of them besides the historically Black ones. At least, they were virtually all white within the lifetimes of people still alive to remember that discrimination. And they all get a lot of benefits from the federal government.
Pic you’re not Shrike, then you should have no problem condemning him as a pedophile.
“That is the core concept that anyone that refers to the U.S. being a democracy is expressing.”
Apparently NOT; since Congresses Democracy has proven to have ZERO respect for the US Constitution.
LOL…. I get the feeling the very word “Black” is the very core symptom of being discriminated against and needing special privileges. Are overly Tan-White people discriminated against too? Maybe overly Tan-White people should take my car with Gov-Guns for special grants to education.
Typical [WE] identity-affiliated gangsters out demanding Gov-Gun entitlements … because…. “Oh ‘poor’ pitty-me… I’m so ‘discriminated against’ because the world won’t just gimmie everything I think I want without *earning* it. It’s so ?unfair?.”
“why were you spitting and screaming at a black kid going to school?”
This is the part where he directly quoted you right before Vizzy got all ass blasted and decided to be a racist piece of shit.
Threading sucks to follow sometimes. Glad I could clear that up.
*crickets*