Justice Department Probe Finds Illegal, Violent, and Discriminatory Policing in Louisville, Kentucky
The two-year investigation, launched after the police killing of Breonna Taylor, concluded that Louisville police routinely used invalid search warrants and failed to knock and announce their presence.

An investigation by the Justice Department has concluded that police in Louisville, Kentucky, routinely violate residents' constitutional rights by using excessive force, conducting illegal traffic stops and narcotics raids, retaliating against residents for protected speech, and discriminating against minorities.
The Justice Department's Civil Rights Division released a report today finding that the Louisville Metro Police Department(LMPD) and local government had "a pattern or practice" of constitutional violations. The civil rights probe was launched in the aftermath of the police killing of Breonna Taylor, who was shot to death during an LMPD narcotics raid in March 2020.
"The Justice Department has concluded that there is reasonable cause to believe that Louisville Metro and LMPD engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that violates the constitutional rights of the residents of Louisville—including by using excessive force, unlawfully discriminating against Black people, conducting searches based on invalid warrants, and violating the rights of those engaged in protected speech critical of policing," Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a press release. "This unacceptable and unconstitutional conduct erodes the community trust necessary for effective policing. It is also an affront to the vast majority of officers who put their lives on the line to serve Louisville with honor. And it is an affront to the people of Louisville who deserve better."
The investigation found stunningly unprofessional behavior by LMPD officers.
"Some officers have videotaped themselves throwing drinks at pedestrians from their cars; insulted people with disabilities; and called Black people 'monkeys,' 'animal,' and 'boy,'" the report says.
The two-year investigation also found that LMPD unreasonably deployed tasers and police dogs on compliant and non-threatening suspects and used unjustified neck restraints.
Narcotics search warrants reviewed by Justice Department investigators were constitutionally deficient. Some were missing sufficient details to establish probable cause, and others were overbroad. LMPD officers also misused confidential informants to obtain search warrants on flimsy grounds.
And when officers carried out those search warrants, they often violated residents' rights by failing to properly knock and announce their presence before bursting into a house. The Fourth Amendment requires that officers knock and announce, except in certain circumstances. Still, Justice Department investigators found numerous examples of LMPD officers announcing their presence at the same time that they broke down a door with a battering ram, or announcing themselves so quietly that no one inside could hear them.
Minorities in Louisville bear the brunt of this unconstitutional police, the Justice Department found. Black drivers in Louisville were 49 percent more likely to be searched than white drivers during the period the Justice Department reviewed.
"For years, LMPD has practiced an aggressive style of policing that it deploys selectively, especially against Black people, but also against vulnerable people throughout the city," the report says. "LMPD cites people for minor offenses, like wide turns and broken taillights, while serious crimes like sexual assault and homicide go unsolved."
The report also singles out the LMPD's retaliatory arrests and uses of force against protesters and journalists during demonstrations following the police killing of George Floyd.
"By using force against peaceful protesters without individualized and adequate justifications, LMPD repeatedly retaliated against speech, in violation of the First Amendment," the report says. "Officers fired thousands of less-lethal rounds, including at peaceful protesters from a rooftop, and at moving vehicles that posed no threat, sometimes shattering windows and risking serious injury to drivers, passengers, and bystanders."
The report notes that "officers used force against journalists who were committing no crimes, posing no safety risk, and not resisting or evading arrest."
This retaliation extended beyond protests to suspects who merely mouthed off to officers:
In January 2019, an LMPD officer instantly and without warning slammed a Black man's head into the ground, causing profuse bleeding after the man called the officer "too little." As the officer pressed the man's head to the floor, he said, "Nobody's too little bro, this is what happens right here . . . . Who's too little, huh?" During the ensuing 30 minutes, the man and officers kept berating each other. Officers used more bodily force against the man even though he was handcuffed and lying prone, posing no risk of harm or flight. Finally, after placing the man in the back of a patrol car, officers twice used OC spray on him, then slammed the door shut on his head, creating a dangerous situation in the unventilated car with air saturated by OC spray.
The investigation found that front-line supervisors and police leadership failed to hold problem officers accountable and, in some cases, didn't investigate misconduct.
Louisville is the latest large U.S. city where a Justice Department probe has identified severe and pervasive constitutional violations by police. Previous investigations found widespread police misconduct in Chicago, Baltimore, and Ferguson, Missouri. These type of investigations into systemic police misconduct were halted during the Trump Administration, but they have again picked up steam under the Biden Administration.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Google pays a good associate degree working from home earning between $4,500 and $6,000 per week. This is usually a great year, on the other hand I am inactive in a terrible economy. q10 “Thank you Google every day for blessing these addresses and currently it is my duty to pay miles and share them with everyone…
here it is I started…………. …>>> https://www.join.hiring9.com
I without a doubt have made $18,000 inside a calendar month through operating clean jobs from a laptop. As I had misplaced my ultimate business, I changed into so disenchanted and thank God (453) I searched this easy task accomplishing ewes this I’m equipped to reap hav thousands of bucks simply from my home. All of you could really be part of this pleasant task and will gather extra cash on-line……. https://Www.topoffer1.com
"This unacceptable and unconstitutional conduct erodes the community trust necessary for effective policing. It is also an affront to the vast majority of officers who put their lives on the line to serve Louisville with honor. And it is an affront to the people of Louisville who deserve better."
No. Does not compute. If we're talking about widespread patterns, we're not talking about a couple bad apples.
No adult (well, no sentient adult) believes in magic. But I have a suggestion for a couple of prestidigitation acts that will amaze.
Make Qualified Immunity subject to rules of common sense (i.e., stealing from a searched suspect would be a violation of his rights whether there was a previous court case on point or not).
Make Absolute Immunity unavailable in defense of a civil suit in cases where the defendant has broken black letter law by his action.
POOF! Any number of problems solved, by couple of acts far simpler than pulling a rabbit out of a hat.
The investigation found stunningly unprofessional behavior by LMPD officers.
"Some officers have videotaped themselves throwing drinks at pedestrians from their cars; insulted people with disabilities; and called Black people 'monkeys,' 'animal,' and 'boy,'" the report says.
The two-year investigation also found that LMPD unreasonably deployed tasers and police dogs on compliant and non-threatening suspects and used unjustified neck restraints.
Narcotics search warrants reviewed by Justice Department investigators were constitutionally deficient. Some were missing sufficient details to establish probable cause, and others were overbroad. LMPD officers also misused confidential informants to obtain search warrants on flimsy grounds.
---------------------------------------------------
Hmm... It's as if all those black people were telling the truth the entire time.
Search warrants were constitutionally deficient. They were signed by local judges?
Sounds like judges have to be reviewed by the justice department as well.
Good luck with that. If you think QI is bad, judges have total immunity.
That only applies to civil actions, not criminal.
They sure as hell should be. When judges rubber stamp warrants on the flimsiest pretexts, they're not doing their job. The whole point of obtaining a warrant is to ensure that police can't just go around busting down doors without showing at least some evidence that a crime has been or is being committed. The warrant in the Taylor case never should have been issued at all, and the no-knock portion was completely illegal. Established case law says police must show evidence that the suspect is potentially dangerous to get a no-knock warrant, not just say the magic word "drugs". The police obtained the warrant on a flimsy pretext any reasonable person could see was bogus, and they presented no evidence that Taylor was so dangerous they needed to invade her home in the middle of the night.
There aren't any consequences for judges who don't do their jobs, and them not doing their jobs provides cover for the cops as long as they didn't lie on the affadavit.
Ideally I'd like to see the failed and immoral drug war ended completely, but even short of that I'd like to see major reforms to searches and warrants. First up, no warrantless searches or arrests unless police actually witness a crime in progress. Unless someone's life is in danger, I don't want to hear about "exigent circumstances". In a world where I can pick up my phone and speak to someone virtually anywhere on the planet in a few minutes, there is absolutely zero excuse for not getting a warrant. If the cops aren't willing to risk waking up a judge to get a warrant, then it's probably not important enough to justify one anyway. Second, no-knock warrants should be issued only if there's clear evidence that someone's life is in danger. Barring that, all warrants should be served during daylight hours by uniformed police. (Personally, I'm amazed more police don't get shot when they pull their Keystone Kommandos stunts. Anybody not in a uniform that breaks into my house in the middle of the night is getting lit up, even if they claim to be cops. Sorry, couldn't hear you over the .45.) I don't want to hear about suspects destroying evidence, either. If the only evidence is a handful of drugs that can be flushed down the toilet, that doesn't justify busting anyone's door down anyway. You're worried that the suspect has a dangerous "arsenal" of weapons? Unless they never leave the house, maybe you should try arresting them away from home, where they presumably don't have their whole arsenal with them. Finally, we need to see some serious reform on the process of obtaining a warrant in the first place. Judges need to be a whole lot more skeptical. Their job is to protect citizens' rights, not to coddle police. Any time there's evidence police lied or fabricated evidence to get a warrant, they should be looking at perjury charges. Police should also face serious consequences if they serve warrants improperly, such as getting the address wrong or excessively damaging property during the course of a search.
Keep sucking that regime cock, ciaramella.
Just how in hell is criticizing bad behavior by armed agents of the state "sucking regime cock"?
Why do we never find these issues in cities controlled by Republicans?
Why do Democrats always hire corrupt, racist cops?
You act like the Mayor of Louisville & the city counsel hires all the police officers in Louisville. Why I bet it would be shocking to learn that the police departments themselves hire their own officers. AND IN EVEN MORE SHOCKING NEWS when one mayor or city council member leaves or loses re-election, the cops that were hired while they were in office remain there for up to 20-30yrs! Can you believe it?
They hired the Chief of Police. And probably have a hand in setting policy.
90% of cities over 100,000 are democrat lol. That's what happens when civilization occurs in high population density areas.
Yeah just like the crime rate in sigapore
Get rid of the democrats.
And by “civilization”, you mean crime, prostitution, drug abuse, disease, cronyism, corruption, authoritarianism, and abuse of power?
Thanks, but I prefer less civilization.
Why did it take two years when CRT already tells us everything is racist?
I worked part-time from my apartment and earned $30,030. After losing my previous business, I quickly became exhausted. Fortunately, I discovered this jobs online, and as a result, I was able to start earning money from home right away. Anyone can accomplish this elite career and increase their internet income by….
After reading this article...............>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
And water is wet.