Be Thankful for Low-Skilled Workers
These are the people who showed up when the economy was shut down by the government, working in jobs labeled "essential."

On Thanksgiving, we rightly give thanks. And let's be clear that, amid all the turmoil that consumes daily headlines, we Americans do indeed have a lot to be thankful for. We are still relatively free. We are also incredibly prosperous—a prosperity that would be impossible without uniquely talented and driven entrepreneurs and the courageous investors who back them. But this year I want to give special thanks to those workers we call "low-skilled."
They may not have acquired the know-how or years of education possessed by the people you see on TV, or by academics, tech gurus, or financial-market whizzes. But low-skilled workers are nevertheless among the unsung heroes of our lives.
Before I begin, I want to challenge an increasingly popular fallacy. It has become a talking point of the political left to insist there are no such thing as low-skilled workers. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–N.Y.) for example, tweeted earlier this year that "the suggestion that any job is 'low skill' is a myth perpetuated by wealthy interests to justify inhumane working conditions, little/no healthcare, and low wages." Many have since jumped on the bandwagon to make the same point. But it's utter nonsense.
If simply calling workers "low-skilled" allowed employers to underpay and overwork them, then every worker in America would be labeled as such and paid a pittance, including professional sports stars and neurosurgeons.
Now to be fair, a lot of the confusion comes from the sloppiness of the term. We tend to lump together entry-level jobs with jobs that don't require much of an education, or with jobs that require hard skills but no formal education. These are very different types of jobs, and they offer very different prospects to those doing them. The term is also complicated by the fact that some of these workers haven't yet acquired the skills necessary to perform more specialized tasks. Plenty of 16-year-olds who mop up spilled milk in supermarkets and mow people's lawns will learn to weld, program computers, or perform brain surgery. In a few years, with more education, they may very well become high-skilled.
While it shouldn't be controversial to say that some workers have fewer job skills than others, there aren't any "no-skilled" workers. In fact, many of the jobs we casually describe as "low-skilled" require important skills, know-how, and gumption. Does anyone truly believe that there isn't special knowledge and practice involved in being a nanny, a prep cook, a gardener, or carpenter's helper? Most college graduates couldn't do these jobs, either because we don't know how (proving that the jobs really require different skills) or because such work is typically terribly hard.
Identifying the workers who currently have the least valuable set of workplace skills isn't part of some scheme to perpetuate a myth; it's simply a way of speaking about, although imprecisely, a reality. That some members of Congress are oblivious to this is evidence of low-skilled thinking (or perhaps high-skilled politics).
While some on the left insist that it's wrong to assume some jobs truly are low skill, some on the right assume that low-skilled workers are somehow undesirable and worth demeaning, especially when these workers come from poor foreign countries. But this, too, is nonsense.
Close your eyes for a second and imagine what your life would be like if, overnight, all workers employed in these fields disappeared. It would be a disaster. Indeed, whether we acknowledge it or not, all of us benefit from these workers busting their butts at work, stocking shelves, picking fruits and vegetables, cleaning homes and hospitals, delivering food, watching kids at day care or home care, and so much more.
These are people who showed up for this country when the economy was shut down by the government, working in jobs labeled "essential." Your local grocery store wasn't kept open during that time by the computer class who stayed comfortably at home. Low-skilled workers were the ones who prepared your food, delivered it and kept the economy going as much as possible. And we all feel the pain right now as others have failed to return to work, leaving millions of jobs unfilled.
More important, many of these workers are part of our families. They care for our children, allow us to work and get promoted, and are an essential part of what makes our lives comfortable. So, on this Thanksgiving, we need to forget the policy and political divides and simply give thanks to these workers without whom our lives would be lesser.
COPYRIGHT 2022 CREATORS.COM.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I am thankful for them. That's why I'm against de facto open borders to replace them at their jobs. We create enough low skill/low education citizens each year (thanks public schools!) to meet our needs. No reason to import more and beggar our own.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
Thanks for deciding that FOR me! AND for all the other low-brow consumers, who are TOO STUPID to decide FOR THEMSELVES what kind of people to pay for their goods and services! What would we ever DOOOO, without paternalistic nannies like YOU?!?!?
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://www.LiveJob247.com
And Shop-Rite probably has lots of job openings now.
You couldn't be more wrong if you tried. There are tons of low-skill jobs begging for people to do the work, and if someone wants to cross the border and do work that we're too good to do, then more power to them.
Constantly pressuring the wages down is an intentional act to screw over these legitimately essential but low-skilled workers.
Again, libertarians cannot remotely claim to be all about free markets when they advocate short circuiting market forces if they go against employers.
"Constantly pressuring the wages down is an intentional act to screw over these legitimately essential but low-skilled workers."
Constantly 'pressuring' wages up is what employees do, and when the employer and employee decide on a value, well, there ya go.
The customer might have something to say about wages, too. At least outside of the public trough domain.
I don’t care what someone else is paid, I do care about how much the product costs.
"The customer might have something to say about wages, too."
Absolutely, and this gets expressed through the ownership/management.
Pay too much, mark up the raw costs and find no buyers.
Pay too little and your product may suffer in quality issues; no buyers for another reason.
Labor gets paid first, any profit comes afterwards.
When the government is the force driving them down --- you cease having a market.
Let us know when that happens.
My last month's online job to earn extra dollars every month just by doing work for maximum 2 to 3 hrs a day. I have. joined this job about 3 months ago and in my first month i have made $12k+ easily without any special online experience. Everybody on this earth can get this job today and start making cash online by just follow details on this website.OPEN>> ONLY USA JOBS
Dude, don't you even Reason? You have to support the entire package: open borders, mandatory wages, and generous public benefits (plus legal weed and ass sex).
There’s also another truckulent issue which gives one food for thought.
That's a big 10-4 on Keeping On Trucking up and down the Border with the Nice Dreams Food Truck there, Good Buddy! 🙂
(I think that covers the Pot, Mexicans, Food Trucks, and Butt-Sex, right?)
And Libertopia In Space
Food trucks in space.
Serving deep dish pizza, pop, and IPAs.
If you have some really great weed and can float that high, yes. 🙂
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)>>> GOOGLE WORK
Google actually pays around 125 bucks an hour, but they're laying people off right now.
As a retail worker, I am thankful for online sales and delivery services! Though they have been around for a long time, they really came into their own this Thanksgiving and took the crowds and craziness away from this year's Black Friday Weekend!
In this respect, Steven Picker is definitely right. The world is getting better. 🙂
“years of education” … “by academics” “jobs that require no *formal* education” “allowed employers to underpay and overwork them” “Most ?formal? college graduates couldn’t do these jobs”
“the suggestion that any job is ‘low skill’ is a myth perpetuated by”
……………………….. Commie-Education (Gov-Guns)……………………..
In Commie-Education land you have to afford to pay off the Government to get a Government Status symbol (BOE). Which has absolutely nothing to do with your skill/knowledge only to protect the employer from lawsuits. ( Just a bunch of red-tape games and theft ).
Because that’s what kind of world the commie’s make. The people who insist government is there to *entitle* them to a living.
I am especially grateful for those who have sacrificed for commie-law games. They are the ignored supply in the land of Gov-Gun DEMANDS.
Isn’t it about time to end the BOE (UN-Constitutional) and let those asking for a skill to determine (honestly) what ‘skill’ level one has accomplished instead of just putting Gov-Gods (arrogant prick know nothings who don’t have to be liable because they pack Gun-Forces of threats/dictation ) in charge of it all.
Whoever thought that GUNS teach children was an idiot. If the WWW and it’s vast # of computers can function without GUN dictated protocols then so can every person. Free markets are the best markets.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
Are you skilled or unskilled?
Unfortunately, a philosophy degree doesn't make you a better barista.
But don't pay them more and flood the country with competition for those jobs to drive labor costs down
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..............>>> onlinecareer1
Remember when you eat your holiday insects the centipede yields a hundred drumsticks.
Good point! Also, cockroach stew is yummy, and rat-fur coats are plush and warm!!!
I'm not going to eat any crickets unless they are humanely raised, and each get one cubic meter to move around in.
An insect rights movement could stop all the cricket factory farms in their tracks.
I like the cut of your jib here! Jiminny Cricket clearly speaks to your humane conscience! However, I am OUTRAGED that you've NOT been able to stir up more outrage! Despite the obvious validity of your points, all I hear is... Crickets!
I'm really thankful to all those who are working during this festive season to make others happy.
Me too Lisa.
Absolutely! I am very thankful for low-skilled workers like Veronique De Rugy.
Anyone writing for this (or any other) website is really just in the entertainment industry. The increased market value derived from this sort of "work" is an effect of technology that allows one and the same instance of "work" to serve many.
Workers involved with the production and sale of a pumpkin pie need to produce a pie for every customer. That requires a ton of more work, and probably skill too, than any think thank "worker" gassing off some keypresses for posting on a blog such as this, where it doesn't really matter if anyone ever reads any of it, because the billionaire funders of the think tank will cut the check just the same.
> I am very thankful for low-skilled workers like Veronique De Rugy
I notice the free-market isn't paying Veronique what her and all the other Reason dot com stenographers/billionaire knob-polisher's economic output would deserve (sub-minimum wage??).
I hope she and all her fellow workers are very thankful for that this holiday season; and maybe they'll all stop arguing for austerity and poverty to be imposed on everyone else just because that's what they think God, I mean the Free Market, requires...
I'm glad that y'all can write SOOO much better than Veronique De Rugy can!!! Now get off of your lazy asses, and DO it! See below...
Do you recall the awesome enchanter named “Tim”, in “Monty Python and the Search for the Holy Grail”? The one who could “summon fire without flint or tinder”? Well, you remind me of Tim… You are an enchanter who can summon persuasion without facts or logic!
So I discussed your awesome talents with some dear personal friends on the Reason staff… Accordingly…
Reason staff has asked me to convey the following message to you:
Hi Fantastically Talented Author:
Obviously, you are a silver-tongued orator, and you also know how to translate your spectacular talents to the written word! We at Reason have need for writers like you, who have near-magical persuasive powers, without having to write at great, tedious length, or resorting to boring facts and citations.
At Reason, we pay above-market-band salaries to permanent staff, or above-market-band per-word-based fees to freelancers, at your choice. To both permanent staff, and to free-lancers, we provide excellent health, dental, and vision benefits. We also provide FREE unlimited access to nubile young groupies, although we do firmly stipulate that persuasion, not coercion, MUST be applied when taking advantage of said nubile young groupies.
Please send your resume, and another sample of your writings, along with your salary or fee demands, to ReasonNeedsBrilliantlyPersuasiveWriters@Reason.com .
Thank You! -Reason Staff
If you think the free market is imposed on society then you have no idea of what free market means.
Free markets are what arise from human interaction when government protects private property rights, enforces contracts and criminal law, and provides courts where people can resolve disputes.
I’m afraid you’re the one who wants to impose on society, not libertarians.
Fuck off and die, asshole, may your Thanksgiving be as miserable as you are.
Damn, that’s a whole lot of stupid in a small amount of words.
De Rugy looks highly skilled, compared to most of the writers on Reason.
Veronica Rugby is at least a better writer than newcomer Emma Camp. Which is about the same as saying she’s a better writer than your average house cat.
I'm glad for De Rugy. I've learned a bit about economics from her.
All I've learned from you is that you know nothing about economics and are likely a net drain on the economy.
Not only am I thankful for low skilled workers, I am very kind and polite to them. If they work in an industry where tips make up their salary I tip them generously.
Same, and since the pandemic I’ve increased my tipping from 15-20 to 25-35%. My business was not hurt so I feel lucky to be secure financially while so many are not. Unfortunately the government handouts drained many of their will to work.
As a veteran of the restaurant industry I always tell people if you don't have enough money to tip generously, you don't have enough money to go out.
And then you wonder why you have so few customers these days.
I’ll bet he stays busy at his glory hole at the Transit Authority.
I don't tip. I make an investment into getting better service in the future
Good for you. Since I have the means, I began tipping "high" many years ago. Usually in the 50% range. And ALWAYS in cash. My first job paid $1.65 per hour -- dirty, boring, thankless, and probably not good for my health. A lot of people have had to start somewhere near the bottom.
Especially if they're good looking.
I might have centered this discussion around the complexity of the skills involved. One of my fave stories, "The Dispossessed," by one of my fave authors, Ursula K. LeGuin, tried to frame occupations around centrality rather than high or low. For example, the skills necessary to face products on shelves are not complex, while the skills necessary to analyze sales, order replacement stocks from suppliers in the correct amounts with the correct timing at the optimum prices are much more complex. Some complex skill-sets require education, some require experience and training and some require both. I heard a presentation of a research study at a conference once that estimated the median number of career changes for Americans at eight per lifetime, compared to previous generations who hoped for forty years with the same firm and a gold watch at retirement age. Perhaps we should refute attempts to demean or virtue signal "low-skill jobs" by re-framing the social issues as low-complexity and as non-central rather than non-essential!
How complex and central are the skills needed by a Doctor of Doctorology, so that he or she or they can be empowered to give me permission to blow upon a cheap plastic flute?
To find precise details on what NOT to do, to avoid the flute police, please see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/DONT_DO_THIS/ … This has been a pubic service, courtesy of the Church of SQRLS!
What is wrong with you?
I don't like to be micro-managed by power-pig assholes giving me permission (or withholding it from me) to BLOW ON A CHEAP PLASTIC FLUTE!!! If YOU like to be micro-managed by power-pig assholes, please move to North Korea!
How much time do you have?
If you do NOT have enough time to move to North Korea to get micro-managed, as I advocate for freedom-haters, then you could always give up your freedom to a cult (may I suggest Scientology?), and they will be VERY glad to take all of your freedoms away from you! Joining a cult would be MUCH faster! Now go give up your freedom to North Korea, or to a cult, if you REALLY insist on hating individual freedom, and stop trying to fight against those of us who LIKE our freedoms!
See?
Yes, I see why responsible individual freedom is a DAMNED FINE IDEA, all around! What I do NOT see is, WHY, in the Sacred Name of Government Almighty, do the totalitarianism-lovers NOT just give up their freedoms to North Korea, or to a cult, and leave the rest of us alone!
(Could it POSSIBLY be simply because they are self-righteous POWER PIGS?!?!?)
"What is wrong with you?"
He's an asshole and he's spastic. And too stupid to recognize either.
Are we not men?!? We are Sevo!
Hey Smegmalung!
Don’t you have more important things to do, instead of thread-shitting here? As San Fran’s foremost homeless hobo, couldn’t you be doing your “squeegee” racket, fighting with the other bums, pooping in the streets, and yelling insane, deluded insults at passers-by?
Smegmalung’s next gig in Gay Ol’ San Fran: Burglary, which San Fran’s media suggests should now be tolerated!
https://www.foxnews.com/media/san-francisco-chronicle-ripped-for-asking-if-residents-should-tolerate-burglaries
San Francisco Chronicle ripped for asking if residents should 'tolerate burglaries'
Next on the Hit Parade for the San Francisco Chronicle: asking if residents should tolerate (even celebrate maybe?), not just burglary, butt also 'child buggery' by Super-Perv-Predator-Sevo the Pedo, Hippo in a Speedo, AKA “SmegmaLung”.
The below poetry is dedicated to Super-Perv-Predator-Sevo the Pedo, Hippo in a Speedo, AKA “SmegmaLung”.
He's a real pedo man
Playing with his pedo gland
Dropping his smegma across the land
Doesn't have a point of view
Knows not where he's going to
Butt he spews stupid insults at you!
Pedo man, please listen
You don't know what you're missin’
Smegma man, the world is at your command
He's as blind as he can be
Just sees what he wants to see
Pedo man, can you see me at all
Smegma man don't worry
Take your time, don't hurry
Leave it all 'til somebody else
Lends you a hand
Ah, la, la, la, la
Doesn't have a point of view
Knows not where he's going to
Butt he spews stupid insults at you!
Pedo man, please listen
You don't know what you're missin’
Smegma man, the world is at your command
…
The below poetry is dedicated to Super-Perv-Predator-Sevo the Pedo, Hippo in a Speedo,
AKA “SmegmaLung”!
Sitting on a park bench
Eyeing little boys with bad intent
Snot's running down his nose
Greasy fingers smearing shabby clothes
Hey, SmegmaLung!
Drying in the cold sun
Watching as the frilly panties run
Hey, SmegmaLung!
Feeling like a dead duck
Spitting out pieces of his broken luck
Oh, SmegmaLung!
Sun streaking cold
A hateful man wandering lonely
Insulting others the only way he knows
Brain hurts bad as he tries to think
Goes down to the bog to spread his stink
Feeling alone
The army's up the road
Salvation a la mode and a cup of tea
SmegmaLung, my friend
Don't you start away uneasy
You poor old sod
You see, it's only me
By you insulting me,
The rotting goes to thee!
See?
Fuck off and die, spastic asshole.
Show us how it's done, Sevo the Pedo! Ye who has "muted" me and SUPPOSEDLY doesn't read my pearls of wisdom! Go trample yourself in your own pig-shit, pearly swine! Rhine-stone pig-pedo in a speedo!
SmegmaLung, this is NO way for you to earn yourself a SQRL necklace! NO SQRL necklace for YOU! BAD dog!
SmegmaLung AKA Swine-Stone Cowboy!!! Pearl-handled Pig!
Oh Ye Rhinestone-whine-stone pig-pedo in a speedo! What is YOUR favorite year of Rhine-whine-wine, Ye Greatest of ALL Great-Sour-Grapes Oink-oink-oenophiles?
See?
Fuck off and die, spastic asshole.
We should really have him euthanized.
My economics professor made us read that book. Anarchist central planners? Please. Central planning requires the imposition of force and the destruction of the individual. Read some Hayek instead.
Yes, but the point of that in the story was that there's no such thing as long-term anarchy. The natural tendency of humans is to coordinate their more complex interactions through either a "central" authority or via a hierarchical system. Both of which then tend to accumulate power. Most modern anarchists are actually syndicalists, along the principle that local authority is better than central authority, and trying to prevent the accumulation of central authority is their biggest problem.
I don’t know where to begin with that, except that it shows a fundamental misunderstanding of economics. The economy is a product of human action, but not of human design. Any attempt to coordinate complex interactions will fail. Central planners fail. Hierarchal systems fail. What works is uncoordinated actions of people using prices as information. Again, put down the science fiction and read something by Hazlitt, Friedman, Sowell, Hayek or some economist who knows that they’re talking about.
Edit: Maybe read “I Pencil.” The point of it is that no central planner can make something as simple as a pencil. If central planners can't make pencils, how can they run an economy. Well, they can't.
https://mises.org/library/i-pencil-0
Great article. The simple fact is that many don't value work. They see their own work as important and difficult, but not others. I work most of my life in an office and tried never to forget that when I left people came in to clean up that office so when I returned it was pleasant to work in. I know those people who cleaned were paid far less than me and, in many cases, didn't speak English.
This has to be parody.
If you can't tell, it doesn't matter - - - - - - - - -
There’s a difference between valuing work and trying to make work less dangerous, odious, boring or dirty for as many people as possible. Some low-complexity jobs cannot be automated, but to the extent that they can be, progress becomes a matter of economics. Introducing automation or, at least, labor-saving devices will usually be based on a cost-benefit analysis and some automation is accomplished at the expense of net loss of low-complexity, low-paying jobs. It is a matter of faith amongst free-market proponents that the economic benefit accrues to the people who lost their low-paying jobs with cheaper products and better-paying jobs for those who can do them; and more room for welfare assistance for those who can’t do those more complex jobs.
Nation Fondly Remembers Time When They Could Still Toy With Idea Of Being Libertarians
I saw that. Reason is pushing hard for the grooming thing
You know The Babylon Bee is not real, right?
Fortunately, many fewer people can fondly remamber being Nazis and no one in the Western World remembers being Witch-Burners.
Fuck Off, Witch-Burning Nazi!
"Does anyone truly believe that there isn't special knowledge and practice involved in being a nanny, a prep cook, a gardener, or carpenter's helper? Most college graduates couldn't do these jobs, either because we don't know how (proving that the jobs really require different skills) or because such work is typically terribly hard."
Another perspective: most of us average people consider low skill tasks as things we could do but prefer not to, and are willing to pay others to do, for a variety of reasons. That includes mediocre levels of child raising, cooking, gardening, and home repair.
Now many college grads, with their amplified elite status, might be less capable when it comes to mundane skills, and likely have a distorted perception.
"Too many Chiefs, too few Indians!"
They may not have acquired the know-how or years of education possessed by the people you see on TV
LOL.
People you see on TV with years of education like Jennifer Lawrence, Ryan Gosling, Katy Perry, Mark Wahlberg, Tom Cruise, Gisele Bündchen, Leo DiCaprio, Johnny Depp, Tracy Morgan, Kate Winslet, Emma Stone, Robert Downey Jr., Rihanna, Demi Levato, Seth Rogen, Matt Dillon, Jessica Chastain, Keanu Reeves, Jude Law, Jim Carrey, Hilary Swank, Jay-Z, Dainiel Radcliffe, Al Pacino...
Do you know what the “or” in “know-how or years of education” means?
I’ll give you a clue. Many people with know-how didn’t get it through years of education. And as far as the people you list goes, many of the actors spent years studying theater, meaning they did have years of education.
Double-LOL @ getting offended and white knighting on behalf of Jennifer Lawrence, Ryan Gosling, Katy Perry, Mark Wahlberg, Tom Cruise, Gisele Bündchen, Leo DiCaprio, Johnny Depp, Tracy Morgan, Kate Winslet, Emma Stone, Robert Downey Jr., Rihanna, Demi Levato, Seth Rogen, Matt Dillon, Jessica Chastain, Keanu Reeves, Jude Law, Jim Carrey, Hilary Swank, Jay-Z, Dainiel Radcliffe, Al Pacino...
Triple-LOL that it took Gosling, Wahlberg, Cruise, Morgan, Rihanna, Reeves, Rogen, Radcliffe... years studying in order to acquire the know-how *or* years of education to become Gosling, Wahlberg, Cruise, Morgan, Rihanna, Reeves, Rogen, Radcliffe... on screen.
Oh please. Pointing out the word "or" isn't white knighting. It's remedial English.
Speaking of remedial English, “many” does not mean “all.”
So instead of accusing me of white knighting, why don’t you go back to grade school and learn basic English.
Except you do know exactly what me and De Rugy meant. You're just another piece of shit Reason commentor who intentionally misinterprets what people say so you can attack them personally.
Happy Thanksgiving. Ass.
Speaking of remedial English, “many” does not mean “all.”
I didn't say "many" *or* "all". Seems like you're remediating your own English.
"Except you do know exactly what me and De Rugy meant. "
De Rugy and I
He veronique economist is a low skilled job. They are wrong 99% of the time. If McDonald's employees had the same record of being wrong McDonald's wouldn't exist
Economists do not produce anything of value. So there is no consequence when they are wrong. So they tend to BE wrong,
"Indeed, whether we acknowledge it or not, all of us benefit from these workers busting their butts at work, stocking shelves, picking fruits and vegetables, cleaning homes and hospitals, delivering food, watching kids at day care or home care, and so much more."
I don't know about the utility of grouping all these workers under the rubric of low skilled. Low paid rather seems to get to the heart of the matter. Pay is something we can easily measure and understand and agree upon. Skill is a lot more controversial. There is some work that we might deem as low skill but highly paid, prostitution perhaps, but this is still controversial as it likely requires a lot of experience, smarts and judgement to do well in the game.
Risk is also something that should be taken into consideration. There are low risk/low paid jobs and high risk/low paid jobs, each requiring their own skills to be done properly.
Even more useful is to put "low-paying" in the context how many people can do the job well enough for an employer to be willing to pay them what it takes to get someone to do the job. If lots of people can do the job well enough to pay them, the employer will be likely to be able to pay them a low wage to do the job. If there are very few people able or willing to do the job, the would-be employer would likely have to pay a much higher compensation to get someone to do the job. Then it's simply a matter of cost-benefit analysis to understand. It's useless to simply consider the wage without considering the market context.
I'm not sure what you mean. The wage is baked into the market context, isn't it? ie the wage and the market are inextricably entwined.
What could be more useful is the number of potential employees for any job. Take a hundred people at random, how many could potentially do the job in question.
"I’m not sure what you mean..."
This being but one of a huge number of things which confuse you.
Only in a market where the government doesn't interfere. The point here is that AO-C thinks everyone should be paid much higher wages based on her desired outcomes rather than admitting that some work isn't worth that much - either to the employer or to society at large. Minimum wage laws are just the tip of the iceberg of government interference in employment. People who disparage low-wage workers likewise take the entire matter out of context in order to justify their own prejudices. As someone who was allowed to help the older kids with the farm chores, where hard dirty dangerous work was NOT disparaged, I can see it from more sides than most of our fellow Americans; and even though I prefer not to do painful hard work these days, it's not because I look down on people who are willing to do it until they can qualify to do something better.
People who disparage low-wage workers likewise take the entire matter out of context in order to justify their own prejudices.
Who is disparaging low-wage workers?
"Only in a market where the government doesn’t interfere. "
Such a market exists? In reality, or as an ideal?
"The point here is that AO-C thinks everyone should be paid much higher wages based on her desired outcomes rather than admitting that some work isn’t worth that much "
I doubt AOC would admit that some work isn't worth that much. She's essentially a socialist, isn't she? She would readily admit that some work isn't highly paid. But some of the least paying work is absolutely vital to a functioning society. Child care, agricultural work, garbage removal, without this work that supposedly isn't worth that much our society couldn't function. I suppose AOC would say: 'Thank low-skilled workers? Fuck that! How about paying them what they're worth? How about that for a change?'
'Such a market exists? In reality, or as an ideal?..'
You are stupid in so MANY ways!
Unless AOC was paid M/W as a barrista, her pay was set by market forces
Do your brains exist, or are they merely a fantasy?
Fuck off and die, asshole.
Hey, the world needs ditch diggers too.
Here's a crazy idea. How about we let two parties decide on what amount of compensation is worth the service one provides the other?
If this means that the immigrant-bashing and free-trade-bashing authoritarian xenophobes will BUTT OUT of my business when I want to buy some goods and services, I am all in favor!!! Yay, Hooray!!!
(Bonus points for getting rid of excessive licenses and regulations ass well.)
BLASPHEMY!!
One can only hope ...
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..............>>> onlinecareer1
"Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene calls Sen. Scott Wiener a ‘communist groomer’ after he tweets about hate speech"
[...]
"A day after her account was reinstated on Twitter, U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene used the platform to refer to San Francisco state Sen. Scott Wiener with a homophobic slur..."
https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/Rep-Marjorie-Taylor-Greene-calls-Sen-Scott-17606923.php
Not sure he's a commie, but he has no scruples about taking your money for causes he thinks are worthwhile, and "groomer" is a "homophobic slur' ever since the writer decided so.
But, hey, MDS is becoming as virulent as TDS.
and “groomer” is a “homophobic slur’ ever since the writer decided so.
"Groomer" is a pedophilic slur. Saying 'groomer is a homophobic slur' is a literal slur that homosexuals and pedophiles are the same thing.
The insistence of the mainstream media that 'groomer' means 'gay' is maybe one of the most ironic things of the year.
"Greene, a Georgia Republican, called the out gay senator a “communist groomer” in response to a tweet he posted over the weekend raising alarm about growing anti-LGBTQ rhetoric in the wake of the massacre at Club Q in Colorado Springs. in the wake of the massacre at Club Q in Colorado Springs."
So far the anti-LGBTQ rhetoric is coming from the LGBTQ crowd denying the assailant his binaryhood.
Happy Thanksgiving everyone! I’m trying to stay true to the spirit of the holiday and count my blessings. I’m also trying to avoid thinking about our political class. Try as I might I just can’t be thankful for that lot. You know who else I’m not thankful for?
Death, taxes, cancer, old age, senility, accidents, tornadoes, bodily defects (genetic and developmental both), volcanoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, parasites, disease organisms, and human-eating predators?
(Ya know, if we were TRULY Faithful Nature-Worshitters, we would NOT curse these "blessings" of ours!!! With the possible exception of taxes, that is.)
To be clear, one might question the "natural" nature of taxes... Few of us REALLY and truly think of taxes as "blessings", though! Else we would voluntarily (I mean, REALLY voluntarily) send our money to Government Almighty. And that ain't me! I ain't no Senator's son!!! (And I'll bet that THEY aren't doing THAT, either!)
Are his initials Joe Biden?
Suffice it to say, this time the initials aren’t A.H. I’m actually quite fond of Aldous Huxley.
I don't care what his/her/its initials are ... I only care about xer pronoun(s)
Maybe "uncredentialed workers" would be a better term.
“Does anyone truly believe that there isn’t special knowledge and practice involved in being a nanny, a prep cook, a gardener, or carpenter’s helper?”
Those jobs are neither “low skill” nor “no skill”. 90% of Gen Z straight out of high school couldn’t work most of those jobs. Certainly not as a nanny. Custodian jobs are actually not that easy to get.
We can recognize the importance of lower level workforce that sustain the economy at large. But being thankful comes from a more personal level. I’m heartened by Trader Joe’s cashiers taking time to place items in the reusable bags that I brought. I’m not “thankful” for glum Walmart cashiers who work slower than molasses even though the line is a mile long. And there are always women who buy like 30 pieces of clothing that needs to be scanned individually. But I digress.
We can certainly appreciate them coming out to work during the pandemic. But we all had to honor obligations during that time. Society will live on if massive amount of fast food joints close. The border patrol agents who confront human traffickers and save migrants they abandon are much more than essential. Will Reason express gratitude for their service? Not them, for obviously reasons.
Sam Harris has deleted his Twitter account.
He's been getting ratioed pretty badly since the "Biden could have dead kids in his basement and Trump is worse".
Including by myself. Harris was going great guns when he was one of The Four Horsemen of Atheism highlighting the absurdities of religion. But in the realm of politics, Harris is as delusional and as blind Faith True Believer as any Theistic Apologist. He doesn't speak for this here Libertarian Atheist.
” He doesn’t speak for this here Libertarian Atheist.”
Not on Twitter at least.
Skill is defined as "the ability to do something well; expertise". Skilled as "having or showing the knowledge, ability, or training to perform a certain activity or task well". Notice that neither definition states what the something/activity/task is but rather skill/skilled is the ability to perform it well. "Low" skilled seems to be a term for those activities/task people believe are beneath them (low), some of which they can do well but most of which they "assume" they could do well but actually could not.
The average person could not wait tables in a restaurant "well" (low skilled) while a great waiter makes it look effortless (skilled).
Personally, I don't like the term.
Skills are highly valuable only in so much as there is high demand for them relative to their supply. There are many trained, "skilled" orchestral musicians, Shakespearean actors, landscape painters, poets, opera singers, polka accordionists, and even academic economists who earn less than a Walmart stock boy. Supply and demand can be real bitches, especially when one is dominant.
That's a heaping helping of pedantry you posted there.
The term is commonly held as not lacking in skills in a particular field, but lacking in the skills required for higher paying positions.
Either you knew that and wanted to signal your snobbish pedantry, or you're an ignoramus. You choose
As President Trump said, "I love the uneducated."
Every job has value, or the people with the money wouldn't pay other people to do it.
People in charge of the government have identified tens of thousands on non-essential government jobs though. All of them should be eliminated, permanently.
"All of them should be eliminated, permanently."
No, not unless you want more red tape, more regulation and more government employees.
That doesn't even make sense.. Does the word 'Trump' stall your cognitive functions or what?
It makes sense once you understand that any effort to reduce the size of government or any bureaucracy inevitably results in something larger, with more red tape.
If you are a regular dart player, you might notice that sometimes your performance may go down, or you feel while throwing your dart, it bounces back when you hit the board and falls off. For old players, it’s easy to detect the problem, but the new player may lose confidence in their selves because no matter how much they practice, they miss most of their hits. Read More click the link: https://www.dartmagic.com/how-to-sharpen-a-dart/
That's actually important, and I'm pretty sure that the fact that they haven't acquired years of education, doesn't mean that they are actually low-skilled in other aspects. Nowadays, there are many sources to learn info on the internet and improve your skills, and personally, I check various blogs to improve my French and even learn curse words in french, and there's a ton of other platforms that help people get educated.
Identifying the workers who currently have the least valuable set of workplace skills is easy. Look for college educated paper pushers and content producers, and those with the "highest" degrees who have never touched a shovel or an oven. Oh, especially those facile wool pullers in government positions who pretend to know enough to make the rules for real people. In fact, if the crap hits the fan enough that their incomes disappear and/or their money means nothing, the 'ignorant of real life' college trained elitists would be the ones expiring, not the so-called low skill workers.