Wacky Wavy Inflatable Tube Men Can't Sell Weed, Say Washington State Lawmakers
Bill would also add severe restrictions on retail businesses' use of billboards.


The Washington state legislature voted to ban the use of "inflatable tube displays, persons in costume, or wearing, holding, or spinning a sign with a marijuana-related commercial message" by retail businesses selling cannabis products. On April 20, of all days.
The omnibus marijuana bill, SB 5131, has some good provisions as well: Washington residents would be allowed to share marijuana with other legal adults for the first time, and cannabis retailers would be able to operate five dispensaries (right now they are limited to three). But those liberalizations come at a cost to commercial speech.
The stated purpose behind this prohibition of pot-promoting blow-up ads is to protect children. Washington's legalization initiative—passed by voters in 2012—set the legal age for cannabis consumption at 21. And current regulations already prohibit marijuana advertisements from using cartoon characters, toys or other depictions deemed "especially appealing to children or other persons under legal age to consume marijuana."
But this apparently did not go far enough for Washington state legislators, who felt that a number of outdoor advertisements from recreational dispensaries were flouting the spirit, if not the letter of the law.
Particularly scandalous was a billboard put up by Tacoma dispensary Clear Choice Cannabis featuring a cat wearing a "thug life" collar along with text saying "I'm so high right meow." Images of that billboard—which has since been voluntarily taken down by business owner—circulated around the Washington legislature as proof of cannabusinesses potentially targeting children.
Said state Rep. Christine Kilduff (D–University Place): "When you have those big billboards out there for our youth to see, it just telegraphs legitimacy."
An amendment banning billboards was initially proposed, but this was later dialed back over First Amendment concerns. Instead signs will be limited to displaying only the name, location, logo, and type of business being advertised. Which should still raise First Amendment concerns, but apparently doesn't.
Unusual restrictions on cannabusinesses' advertising for the purpose of keeping the stuff out of the hands of children are not limited to Washington state. Colorado bans marijuana ads in radio, TV, and print unless the advertiser can produce reliable evidence that no more than 30 percent of the audience is under 21. And in Oregon the strain name "girl scout cookie" can't be displayed on packaging because it is named after a product sold both to and by children.
SB 5131 is currently waiting on the governor's signature before it becomes law.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Said state Rep. Christine Kilduff (D?University Place): "When you have those big billboards out there for our youth to see, it just telegraphs legitimacy."
So what did legalizing it do if not confer legitimacy?
Legitimacy meant taxation and regulation.
Rep. Christine Kilduff (D?University Place): "When you have those big billboards out there for our youth to see, it just telegraphs legitimacy."
It is legitimate you pearl-clutching idiot! What the holy hell was the point of legalizing it otherwise? Christ, this idiot represents University Place?
"inflatable tube displays
So inflatable yellow tube displays are A-OK?
Inflatable tube snake displays are right out.
They never wanted to 'telegraph legitimacy". They just wanted the tax dollars and payola.
Did domething giv e you the impressiin that cannibis was going to be treated any better than tobacco by the legislature?
Nothing telegraphs legitimacy like an armwaving tube man.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvaRGiMWRaE
Washington's marijuana laws are a convoluted pile of tangled nannyist nonsense. Out of all of the regulations they slapped on this ostensibly "legal" business, this advertising bullshit prohibition is probably the least absurd.
Agreed. The whole thing is so awful, at this point if they made marijuana shop owners sing the state song before opening, I'd really just shrug.
Now that April 15 is past, maybe Liberty Tax will lend out their dancing statue of liberty costume.
When will society get serious about the Wacky Wavy Inflatable Arm-flailing Tube [Persons] alluring our youth to auto dealerships and the like?
I got friends been selling pot for years and they didn't need no stinking yellow tube man to advertise. In fact, they really didn't do any marketing at all.
I did it all for the pussycat
Blame it on the war against "big tobacco" which resulted in cute characters like Joe Camel getting banned. Now they're doing the same to pot.