Almost Half of 184 People Killed by Georgia Cops Since 2010 Were Unarmed and/or Shot in the Back
Investigation reveals that every one of these police shootings was deemed lawful.

A new report conducted by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and Atlanta's Channel

2 Action News reveals a "disturbing" number of unarmed people have been killed by police since 2010, with nearly two out of every five shot in the back. Perhaps as disturbing, not a single police shooting was ruled to be unjustified during this period.
Responding to an issue we've covered in great detail here at Reason (that no national database for police shootings yet exists), the sweeping report notes that the federal government has failed for more than two decades to move toward some transparency and accountability regarding police shootings:
In 1994, Congress ordered the U.S. Department of Justice to start collecting excessive force data and issuing annual reports on its findings. The agency didn't follow through…
In Georgia, the under-counting by the FBI system has been significant and longstanding. Over a five-year period, the AJC/Channel 2 investigation found more than twice as many fatal shootings than were identified by the FBI…
Local police agency reporting to the FBI is optional. The GBI [Georgia Bureau of Investigation], which helps the federal government gather data in Georgia, said that only 16 of the more than 600 police agencies in Georgia reported the justifiable homicide data to the agency.
The reporters associated with this report interviewed more than 100 people and meticulously combed through data pertaining to Georgia police shootings over the past six years:
The files included police incident reports, investigative notes, crime scene photos and videos, medical examiner reports, autopsies and other records. The team examined death records to identify demographic information about civilians shot by police, consulted law enforcement agencies to determine the demographic, personnel and training records of police officers, and built a database to analyze the information. Reporters examined the mental state of those shot, the circumstances that led to a confrontation with police, the presence or absence of weapons and the training and backgrounds of the officers involved. Using death records, autopsies, investigative records and media reports, reporters learned the location of wounds for those killed.
Some important takeaways from the report:
- 18 people were shot solely in the back. 52 other people were shot in the back and on other parts of their body.
- About one out of every four people killed had some form of mental illness. Of these, at least 16% were military veterans.
- At least 20 officers involved in a fatal shooting had "serious prior issues documented on their records," including being fired from other law enforcement jobs for lying or failing to complete required training.
- More than one-third of fatal shootings involved people shot in their own homes, usually after police had responded to a call for help.
- Most of the fatal shootings analyzed involved situations with armed individuals threatening officers, with about 1 in 4 having fired a gun at some point during their altercation with police.
A likely reason none of these shootings were ruled unjustified is because of the special privileges Georgia police officers enjoy during grand jury investigations, including the right to be present during the entire process and "give a statement at the end that cannot be questioned by prosecutors or grand jurors."
The entire report, which includes a strikingly effective interactive section and several stories of highly questionable police shootings, is well worth reading.
In 2014, Reason TV covered a truly horrific case involving an 80-year-old man who was shot by police while lying in his own bed. Watch below:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Look. Shootings have to be ruled as lawful (even when they are not), because if they weren't then public trust could suffer.
Prosecuting bad cops is the worst thing a police department could do, because that would require admitting that bad cops are on the force in the first place. Then the people involved in hiring the bad cops might come under scrutiny, as well as other cops on the force. Public trust would go down the shitter and the people realized that their government is populated not by angels who think only of the public good, but of fallible human beings who have desires of their own.
Stupid Georgians, always carry a gun to plant.
Those officers are lucky they managed to level their weapons in time, what with perps charging backwards at them full speed, ready to attack with their shoulder blades.
How many more Christmas nut punches do we have to endure?
Have an anti-nut punch: http://wordcook.net/2015/12/21.....holy-land/
Nice one, LTC, thanks for sharing.
Thanks, Swiss.
The police have a better error rate than machines. Is there anything police can't do?
Well, they're statistically in line with a Schroedinger box.
The officer both shot and killed and left the victim completely alone...
/Schroedinger's cop
No no no. The perp is simultaneously armed and unarmed until the cop shoots him, at which point the probability function collapses into either one or the other.
I think the most surprising finding in this study is that the number of black and white victims were about even.
This is what we need to publicize to counter the race-baiters and get real police reform...
Which will never happen...
I'm less interested in countering the race-baiters than I am in getting more robust numbers about police shootings nationwide and over time. Highlighting the scope of the problem will go a long way toward convincing the unconvinced that reforms are necessary. And if black people constitute the majority of police shooting victims (which I suspect they do), then it will be worth considering race as a factor in those reforms.
(which I suspect they do)
On what basis? This sample is 49/47 but Georgia has more Black residents than all but 2 states.
The raw number of police shooting deaths is pretty meaningless too. If you read the individual cases in the AJCreport most sound perfectly justifiable. Does it matter if more Blacks are killed than other groups if they are felons killed "exchanging gunfire with police" ?
On the basis of a vague sense developed over the years of reading about shooting cases at H&R. I'm happy to consider any evidence you might have that shootings are equal or that whites get it worse from the cops than blacks.
And you'll notice that I didn't say 'raw number', but rather 'robust numbers' which can be broken down along lines of race, circumstance, officer history, etc.
And yes, if blacks are reported to be exchanging gunfire with cops more often than whites, then its worth considering a) whether those reports are accurate, b) why that might be the case, and c) what can be done to change it.
OFFICER SAFETY KNOWS NO RACE, CREED OR COLOR - ALL MUST DIE SO THE BLUE HEROES MAY GO HOME SAFELY!
/FOP Handbook
BLACK Lives Matter, dammit!
Sorry, not all of those lives matter.
Hmm... Georgia has twice as many whites as blacks. If we take violent crime rates as a proxy for getting shot by cops, whites are significantly over-shot. Then you ask if mental health issues can explain the difference, but blacks have more of those, so unless there's a specific mental health issue that whites have a lot more of and causes you to get police to shoot you, it can't.
So my best guess is that a large portion of police shootings are basically random, based on the number of interactions with officers.
And that is surprising.
"More than one-third of fatal shootings involved people shot in their own homes, usually after police had responded to a call for help."
THE IRONY!!! IT BURNS!!!!
Say it after me, people: I don't call the police.
Draw from that what you will.
Unless and until we dissolve police unions the killing will continue. We have known for a long time that the police were committing genocide against african americans. That's why it is important to continue to expose the white-supremacist that have special immunity given to them from police unions to kill unarmed and mentally ill and receive paid vacations. Officers that murder unarmed are celebrated and honored.
Thanks to the Guardian we have data showing the atrocities being committed by the police against american citizens.
Ughh
Well....the last line got a partial point right.
Perhaps you missed the "while the people killed were largely evenly split between black and white".
We have a police union problem, we have a police conduct problem and we have a police accountability problem...for everyone.
You know who else had a problem with...EVERYONE?...
Ming the Merciless?
Warty?
Oh, don't let that distract you--the article harps on the disproportionate number of black people shot over and over again. You are meant, after reading this, to leap to the conclusion that racism is at the core of the problem.
That way, we'll continue to ignore any problem intrinsic to policing.
Idiot.
The police have not been committing genocide against anyone.
Get your panties unwadded and deal with the subject like a big boy and stop throwing hysterical hyperbole around - especially here, the only hyperbole we tolerate relates to immigration.
And STEVE SMITH or WARTY related atrocities.
That's not hyperbole.
Motive, means, and opportunity.
Hey, is this the guy you referred to yesterday?
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35154411
Yeah, incorrect usage of "genocide" really pisses me off. The police have done bad things, but they're not anything like genocide bad
The study found black and white shootings about even.
You have a better chance of getting killed by police than by Muslim terrorists. I believe it is the FOP that is encouraging Obama to import more Muslim "refugees", makes their stats look better.
Did the officer involved go home safe? Then it was justified. Case closed.
Think of all the families who's lives have been destroyed by police departments nationwide. The greatest threat to american are the police not terrorism.
"greater" "Americans"
/Filling in for Nikki
The police would have to go a long way to equal the number of homicides committed by people who aren't cops. Stick with the facts and leave the hyperbole alone.
They wouldn't, however, have to go far to equal the number of homicides committed by terrorists.
Hence the need to be careful when using words like greatest; Swiss made my point more succinctly but I didn't see his comment before mine posted.
Yeah, we already know that.
Of course, it would help if you stuck around for the *discussions* rather than posted and ran away.
But how many of them were black? That's the more important question.
Georgian asses look exactly like pit bulls. They might even be pit bulls. You can't prove otherwise.
"It was growling at me!"
"No, dude had just had a bean burrito"
Can you narrow gaze yourself? I need a ruling here!
If you hold the mirror at the right angle, sure.
*checks ruling on the field*
*slightly narrows gaze*
Ruling on the field stands, Restoras retains his time out.
*narrows gaze at mirror*
Ow!
Obligatory:Ha-hah!
I must say, the AJC has started looking enough more like a real newspaper that I might consider re-subscribing again.
Credit where credit is due - that was fine journalism/investigative reporting.
OT: War on Christmas!
Ban White Christmas!
Butthurt Report Form
"Ban White Christmas!"
Blame climate deniers!
They missed the hidden variable. The college students didn't primarily sign the petition because they thought it was racist, but because they knew it was composed by a Jew. Yet another example of modern leftist Antisemitism on campus.
So it was a WIN-WIN for the SJWs....
OT: The CommonReich cancels CCW reciprocity.
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.c.....greements/
I'm not even going to make a wild guess that he's a democrat and got a big sack of crony bucks from out of state anti-gun crusaders.
Funny you should mention that...Field Marshal Bloomberg has been busy.
I didn't realize the Attorney General had the authority to do that.
They kept reciprocity with WV which is ironic since WV's about to overturn the governor's veto of constitutional carry legislation.
interesting comment at the link wrt non-residents suing under Obergefell v Hodges.
hate to be a wet blanket, but 70/184 isn't really almost half.....
What is 11% or so amongst friends?
31 unarmed + 70 shot in the back ? 11 shot in the back while unarmed = 48.9%
90/184
I know you showed your work, but I am going to need a pie chart on this one. Thanks.
At first i read that as "pee chart" and i was all "The R. Kelly thread is over there, Crusty."
No, I said we need a pie chart, not a flowchart.
*slow clap*
Here you go
Lesson learned: Kbolino delivers.
Look - I'm as up for stopping cops from shooting people willy-nilly as anyone, but
*nearly* 2 out of 5 isn't close to 'almost half'.
Its closer to one out of three - or 'nearly a third'.
Yeah, ignore that - I need to work on my reading comprehension,.
Under-reporting is rampant and still; At least 20 officers involved in a fatal shooting had "serious prior issues documented on their records," including being fired from other law enforcement jobs for lying or failing to complete required training.
This sort of systemic violently malicious dereliction is unbelievable. Good thing we put Kim Davis in jail.
My take: when a police officer is near you with his gun drawn, your best bet is to drop to the ground with your hands spread wide while screaming "I'm a cop, I'm a cop."
Sure, the police officer will be angry when he finds out you are not a cop, but you will most likely be alive. Maybe.
Given the reports I've seen of police "shootouts", being an officer only marginally increases your chances of not getting shot.
OT: US Economy overheating! http://www.marketwatch.com/sto.....2015-12-22
I'm reminded of "she took a more aggressive posture in her bed,"
http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/06/24/28330.htm
Those brave heroes. 86 year old women can be dangerous. Especially if they are bedridden and on oxygen. Those heroes exercised remarkable restraint. They could have killed her and it would have been a good shoot. At least they went home safely. That's all that matters.
Not in the Onion, but I cannot tell if this is satire.
The cops should sue this old woman because she didn't have a puppy to shoot, ruined the cops entire day. Can't be letting our heroes get low moral.
Until "Killed by blow of fist or foot" no longer appears as Cause Of Death, unarmed is a relative condition.
Geez, and people think ISIL is their enemy...
White Southerners just love their police. No reason for it today but the vestiges of Slavery last forever South of the Mason-Dixon line. Obama's JUSTICE Department could have made a difference in 8 years but he was too busy looking in the mirror.
I live below the Mason Dixon line and there are a bunch of cops on trial for murder here in Baltimore right now. Not that any of them are going to be convicted, they're part of the ruling class machine. But that's also true in all of the rest of the country. Why are you specifically picking out the south here?
Best not screw with the trigger happy cops in GA.
http://www.GoneAnon.tk