Two new studies—one from academia, the other from an advocacy group—further undermine the arguments for the stop-and-frisk police tactics championed by former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg. The Wall Street Journalreports:
New York Civil Liberties Union
New analyses of crime and enforcement by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and the New York Civil Liberties Union show that even as police stops of pedestrians have declined sharply in recent years, New York City has continued to see a drop in crime….
John Jay researchers tracked the arrests and stops made and criminal summonses issued by New York City police between 2003 and 2014. They found that these law-enforcement actions by city police increased dramatically in the early 2000s, then dropped suddenly after 2011. Throughout that time, New York City saw a continuing drop in crime from peak levels in the 1980s….
A report by the New York Civil Liberties Union reached similar conclusions, finding that stops fell by 93% between 2011 and 2014, as crime fell or remained flat.
"Contrary to the fear-mongering of some, the dramatic declines in stop-and-frisk have not spawned a crime wave," said NYCLU head Donna Lieberman.
To read the rest of the Wall Street Journal piece, go here. The John Jay College study is here, and the NYCLU report is here.
Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com
posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary
period.
Subscribe
here to preserve your ability to comment. Your
Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the
digital
edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do
not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments
do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and
ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
I'm sure that crimes committed by the police dropped dramatically after 2011. After all, stop-and-frisk is a great opportunity for cops to say "I'm just going to take this, and if you say anything about it I'll hunt you down and throw you in jail," not to mention the countless assaults and false arrests.
Um, what part of "secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated" isn't clear English already?
FoE must have been stopped, if not frisked, as I am here before him!
No one cares about a non-Links post. Those are barely worth reading much less commenting on. Duh.
sour grapes F.O.E. ?
*strokes ticket stub from the C.itizens R.ally for A.wareness of non links P.osts*
I'm sure that crimes committed by the police dropped dramatically after 2011. After all, stop-and-frisk is a great opportunity for cops to say "I'm just going to take this, and if you say anything about it I'll hunt you down and throw you in jail," not to mention the countless assaults and false arrests.
...even as police stops of pedestrians have declined sharply in recent years, New York City has continued to see a drop in crime.
THAT'S BECAUSE WITHOUT THE WARRANTLESS SEARCHES HOW ARE THEY SUPPOSED TO FIND THE CRIME?
More cops and bigger budgets are needed, obviously. The crime is hiding and they need to find it!
I assume President Obama will ask Bloomberg about this when he meets with him?
Stop and Frisk across America?
Um, what part of "secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated" isn't clear English already?