At Least the Federal Reserve Can Help Those Playing the Stock Market
Otherwise, evidence for positive outcome from quantitative easing slim, says study from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Stephen D. Williamson of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis last month issued a study called "Current Federal Reserve Policy Under the Lens of Economic History: A Review Essay."
CNBC ran a good summation of it, and they point out something Williamson himself didn't really draw attention to while mostly writing off the past 7 years of quantitative easing as not accomplishing many of the central bank's own goals:
as for spurring inflation, reducing employment or otherwise generating sustained economic activity, the results, particularly for QE, are "at best best mixed." In addition to muted inflation, gross domestic product has yet to eclipse 2.5 percent for any calendar year during the recovery, while wage gains, and consequently living standards, have been mired around 2 percent or less.
"There is no work, to my knowledge, that establishes a link from QE to the ultimate goals of the Fed—inflation and real economic activity."
But what might Federal Reserve policy have helped achieve?
The primary place where QE seems to have worked is in the stock market, where the S&P 500 has soared by 215 percent since the recession lows in March 2009. Elsewhere, though, deflation fears have permeated and interest rates have remained low.
Andrew Huszar, who managed a mortgage-backed security purchase program for the central bank, admitted it did more to prop up Wall Street then to help most Americans back in 2013:
Despite the Fed's rhetoric, my program wasn't helping to make credit any more accessible for the average American. The banks were only issuing fewer and fewer loans. More insidiously, whatever credit they were extending wasn't getting much cheaper. QE may have been driving down the wholesale cost for banks to make loans, but Wall Street was pocketing most of the extra cash….
See Reason's 2014 set of essays on why predicted inflation has not (yet) resulted from the Fed's years of QE-ing.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ha Ha Fed.....but shit, what Hihn said.
(also it's not just the search for returns that goosed the market, corporations are borrowing at ZIRP and using the money for stock buybacks).
There is a guy that knows what time it si.
http://www.Total-Privacy.tk
You can asy that again!
1+
The primary place where QE seems to have worked is in the stock market, where the S&P 500 has soared by 215 percent since the recession lows in March 2009. Elsewhere, though, deflation fears have permeated and interest rates have remained low.
No, no! It was Teh Lightworker's great policies that have made the market boom! Which ones you say? You know...those ones....when he... RACIST!
/derp
Despite what may have been politically possible to said at the time, the obvious purpose of the program was what this article states. To recapitalize banks. This avoided a government takeover of the large numbers of insolvent banks. Recapitalization was probably the better of the options, at that time. And the only politically viable one as a wide scale shuttering of commercial and investment banks was not going to happen. A separate result was to make banks profitable enough to pay politically motivates fines for essentially doing the governments bidding during the mortgage bubble years.
Hihn: We're fucked.
+1 General Custard
Yep, we're basically in the same exact trap that Japan is is now.