Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Missouri's Governor Commutes a Marijuana Offender's Life Sentence

After 21 years in prison, Jeff Mizanskey is eligible for parole.

Jacob Sullum | 5.22.2015 5:12 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
YouTube

Today Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon commuted the life sentence of marijuana offender Jeff Mizanskey, who will now be eligible for parole. Mizanskey, a 62-year-old grandfather who has been in prison for 21 years, was arrested in 1993 after he drove a friend to a motel where the friend bought several pounds of marijuana from someone who turned out to be a police informant. Mizanskey, who said he had no idea what his friend planned to do, was convicted of possession with intent to distribute. Because he had two prior convictions for selling marijuana, he received a mandatory sentence of life without parole under Missouri's "three strikes" law.

Last month a bipartisan group of state legislators urged Nixon to grant Mizanskey's clemency petition. "There is no way he would have gotten that charge if he had pled guilty," said Rep. Shamed Dogan, a Republican who had introduced a bill that would free Mizanskey. "But our system punishes people for going to trial." More on that here.

Mizanskey's case, which Aaron Malin highlighted here last August, is unusual but not unique. In a 2013 report on thousands of nonviolent offenders serving sentences of life without parole, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) describes 14 other cases where people received that penalty for marijuana offenses. The ACLU's list is not exhaustive, because it includes data for only nine states, plus the federal prison system. It also does not include de facto life sentences imposed as terms of years. Like Mizanskey, the marijuana lifers in the ACLU report are all victims of laws aimed at "habitual offenders." Nationwide a total of about 40,000 people are serving prison sentences for marijuana offenses.

[via Jason Rosenbaum on Twitter]

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Ireland Votes on Gay Marriage, Trouble for Duggar Family, a Nungesser Accuser Speaks: P.M. Links

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason.

PolicyWar on DrugsClemencyMarijuanaSentencingCriminal JusticeDrugs
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (14)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. R C Dean   10 years ago

    But our system punishes people for going to trial.

    Yes, it does. We need to change that.

    I propose that any offer made by the DA set a cap on the punishment that can be imposed.

    The DAs will still have to make plea bargains, because they don’t have the capacity to take every case to trial. If the DA thinks X months is enough punishment per the offer, well, that should be good enough for anyone, right?

    1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

      The DAs will still have to make plea bargains, because they don’t have the capacity to take every case to trial.

      How about that be the thing we change. No more plea bargaining. Everything goes to trial.

  2. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

    Good for the gov, but it could have been better. He’s merely made Mizanskey eligible for parole:

    “”In the case of the commutation, my action provides Jeff Mizanskey with the opportunity to demonstrate that he deserves parole,” Gov. Nixon said.”

    No, numbnuts, just because you’re scared he might commit another crime and you want to be able to pass the buck and blame the parole board, doesn’t mean it’s just *under any circumstances* to make him serve over 21 years. It’s unjust. And that means the sentence needs to be commuted to time served, even if that means taking the risk that a guy who’s spent decades in prison with a bunch of worse criminals might not immediately become a law-abiding citizen.

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      Seriously, a person’s sentence should be based on the nature of the crime, and maybe an objective measurement of recidivism, like criminal history (that is, crime’s he’s previously been *convicted* of).

      Everything else is entrail-reading.

  3. Agammamon   10 years ago

    “There is no such thing as a plea of innocence in my court. A plea of innocence is guilty of wasting my time.”

  4. Paul.   10 years ago

    Nationwide a total of about 40,000 people are serving prison sentences for marijuana offenses.

    That’s disturbing.

    I’d be curious to see a study on that. Especially the effects of the justice system and byzantine ‘enhancers’ on certain crimes that would otherwise be normally low-level.

    I have a friend who’s such a gun-nut he makes me look like a soccer mom and he’s into silencers. Got all his tax stamps and complies with all the regs, but reads some of the laws. Crazy shit that can get you thrown in the clink for 20 years if you commit a crime while in possession of a silencer.

    Guess some congresscritter saw too many spy movies or Scarface or something, got scared and got some crazy minimums passed.

    Which is funny because the U.S. is positively scared shitless of silencers, yet in some places in Europe, they’re required.

    1. Agammamon   10 years ago

      For the same reason so many places here are scared of switchblades.

      Hollywood.

      Seriously, these people don’t understand that movies *don’t depict reality*.

      But they here James Bond’s silencer go *phffft* and they figure these things are what master assassins use to kill cops.

      1. Winston   10 years ago

        You Know Who Else blamed Hollywood for corrupting America?

        1. Paul.   10 years ago

          The Hays Code?

        2. Quincy, 12D   10 years ago

          Andrew Breitbart?

    2. Agammamon   10 years ago

      We need a ‘Tiger Repellent Award’ for laws like this.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94dGsSNOmDI

  5. bassjoe   10 years ago

    It is still shocking to me Three Strikes laws are constitutional to begin with.

    1. jay_dubya   10 years ago

      life for being in a hotel room with a plant sounds cruel and unusual to me. but then again I am a human being with a conscience so I have no role in making or enforcing laws

  6. 3   10 years ago

    Well it’s about goddamn time.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump Wants To Revive the Militarization of Police

J.D. Tuccille | 6.9.2025 7:00 AM

Put the Libertarians Back in Charge

Peter Suderman | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Up, Up, and Away

Charles Oliver | 6.9.2025 4:00 AM

Terry Moran Insulted Stephen Miller? That's None of the Government's Business.

Robby Soave | 6.8.2025 8:55 PM

As American as Due Process

Billy Binion | From the July 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!