Check Out Matt Welch's And Nick Gillespie's Ask Me Anything at Reddit
On friday, Matt Welch and I participated in a two-hour-long AMA ("Ask Me Anything") at Reddit, the immensely popular user-controlled aggregator site. Folks asked us hundreds of questions about everything from arcane libertarian policy positions to clothing to presidential race in 2016 to you name it. We did our best to answer as many as we could.
Here's a link to the full exchange.
And here are the top two questions (as voted on by participants). If you go to site, you'll see tons more of back-and-forth, both on these questions and all the others.
[–]passstab 89 points 1 day ago
Reason has run a lot of anti-copyright articles.
Would your organization consider releasing Reason under a Copyfree license? Doing so would be consistent with libertarian ideals and would be a very easy way to promote your publication and its ideas.Thanks for the great website.
[–]Nick_GillespieNICK GILLESPIE[S] 68 points 1 day ago
We try not to speak in the royal we at Reason (we don't believe in monarchy or group-based editorial stances), so I won't speak for my colleagues. But I am very much in the copyright anarchist camp. Whatever the origins of copyright in an American (and constitutional) context, it's clear that most intellectual property laws are the tools of politically connected firms (cough, cough, Disney, cough cough). As long as you are not falsely claiming work as your own, I think things should be wide open.
Our goal at Reason--published by a nonprofit--is to spread our ideas and journalism far and wide. This turns out not only to be a pretty good business model (we have stable if limited funding) but it means we don't get super worried when people start using our stuff. But we haven't looked at the copyfree license and probably should.
As with immigration and drug laws, copyright laws are not particularly operative in the decisions people make. But to the extent they make it harder to produce and consume culture, they should be amended.
…
[–]awoogatron4000 29 points 1 day ago
What is your view on the civil rights act?
[–]MattWelchReasonMATT WELCH 81 points 1 day ago
I would have voted yes. There are some libertarians who are horrified by that answer (including my co-host [on Fox Business' The Independents] Kmele Foster, probably!), because of the private-property intrusions, and there are plenty of others (including legal theorist Richard Epstein) who counter that public accommodation was something the government just needed to get into.
I think people oughtta be able to talk about this stuff without being branded a racist (that is, assuming they aren't being all racisty about it), but yeah, I would have voted for it.
And don't forget: We're in the middle of Reason's annual Webathon, where we're hoping to raise $200,000 from readers of Reason.com who like what we do at Reason magazine, this website, and Reason TV.
Go here for giving levels and associated swag. If you care about "Free Minds and Free Markets" and care about bringing libertarian ideas and analysis into politics, culture, please consider giving.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Oh sure, that's what racists always say, racist.
Awesome that they went into that viper's den. I know it wasn't a debate, but it would be really cool if
1. They followed up their answers with sourced links.
2. They answered the other big arguments here.
3. They did AMA's with the commenters her regularly.
I can only imagine what an AMA with Postrel would look like. 😉
I refused to participate in the sanitized, preselected, corporate focus group tested sham of a Q&A.
You know who else refused to participate in a sanitized group test?...
Eric Garner?
Not enough hate.
In regards to the Civil Rights Act, I think individuals should be free to make choices for themselves--even if they're stupid choices.
That being said, although extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, opposing the Civil Rights Act has flunked the cost/benefit analysis going all the way back to Barry Goldwater.
There's gotta be a better battle to pick somewhere.
But how is it the SoCon's fault Ken?
My Uncle Nathan got a stunning cream Cadillac CTS-V Sedan by working part-time at home online... Check This Out
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\------- http://snipr.com/29i4rlk
Nick Gillespie: Are you still Charlie Kelly's landlord?
http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net....._Hwang.png