Obama Lost *Because* of His Early Legislative Wins, Not Despite Them
Over at The Washington Post, Katrina vanden Heuvel chalks up broad Republican gains in the midterms solely to the GOP's negativism. Sen Mitch McConnell, she writes, "won his majority by brilliantly waging a partisan, dishonest, unrelenting policy of obstruction."
At National Review's The Corner blog, Reason contributor and Mercatus Center economist Veronique de Rugy counters by pointing out some inconvenient truths.
…vanden Heuvel's lament would only really make sense if Obama hadn't actually gotten all that he wanted during the first two years of his first term. Remember the huge stimulus bill that was supposed to prevent the unemployment rate from exceeding 8 percent? How about Dodd Frank and the promise that it would successfully regulate the big banks, save us from the moral hazard created by "Too Big to Fail," and address systemic risk? And let's not forget Obamacare and its promise to fix health care, provide health insurance to everyone (especially the chronically poor), lower premiums, and help the long-term budget outlook. Does vanden Heuvel really want to blame the HealthCare.gov debacle on Republicans? She can certainly try, I suppose.
And then, of course, if you turn to things like the war on drugs, immigration,transparency, or all the scandals that took place under this administration (VA, the IRS, and Fast and Furious, etc, etc), vanden Heuvel shouldn't be surprised that Obama has become unpopular even with his own base.
That's putting it mildly. One of the reasons why libertarian ideas are getting a longer look than ever before is precisely because both conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats have gotten to implement their visions in the recent past. Both major parties and the ideologies they represent have gotten to do exactly what they wanted to do and in each case the only clear result was…putting the other side in power. Time for an alternative, maybe?
De Rugy concludes:
Just as Republicans need to admit that the Bush years were hugely disappointing for those of us who believe in free markets and small government, Democrats should admit that it's the failures and shortcomings of the Obama administration that have put the GOP back in control of Congress.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
vanden Heuvel, the penultimate example of everything wrong with the left. If she didn't exist her persona would have to be invented to describe how detached from reality progressives really are.
I do love it when rich people, especially those with inherited wealth, advocate for socialism. Hey Katrina, I'll send you my address so you can do some of the income redistribution you like so much. A personal check is fine.
I really wonder if she sincerely believes this, or if it's just a talking point to shift the blame and calm the panicky troops.
She sincerely believes it, the echo chamber she inhabits is hermetically sealed and has been constructed to withstand the rhetorical equivalent of a nuclear explosion.
...and don't expect a check.
Then she doesn't believe in helping others.
Not that SF needs a check, but if she isn't very charitable with her own monies, one can quickly and easily deduce she could care less.
Revealed preferences through actions.
Let people say what they want - just judge them based upon their actions. Much more useful and accurate.
She's doing it for the same reason they all do. To be one of the cool people.
Her money? You seem to be unclear on the concept - she's only generous with other people's money.
Exactly. She has to be the hackiest partisan hack ever to hack in all of Hackdom. She's so predictable in her partisanship you know what she's going to say (and who she's going to blame) about six years before she says it. She makes Sean Hannity look like slightly less of a shaved ape, and that's saying something.
I recall a time in 2005 ish, when she was talking about the GWB administration as the "most extreme right-wing" administration in history. She's knows a lot but understands very little.
I love this shit. Keep it coming. Yummy yummy fucking tears. I wish I bottle them and use them as sex lube.
Uh... Sounds rough.
He and Warty like it that way.
"Rough? Just the way your mother likes it."
-Sean Connery
"Come on, that's way out of line"
-Alex Trebek
SUCK IT TREBEK!
-Connery
You know who else lost because of his early wins?
Pyrrhus?
Caesar?
Alexander?
Dan Marino? Peyton Manning? Tom Brady?
Baron Harkonnen?
Jim Thorpe?
Wait, I know this: it was your mom.
Bullshit! It was Yamamoto!
Tora! Tora! Tora!
George Armstrong Custer?
No early wins.
Except for being a general at Gettysburg and Appotomax.
Appomattox
Rob Stark?
...libertarian ideas are getting a longer look than ever before...
Yeah, the Libertarian Moment is upon us.... as soon as we finish the War on Terra and increase the federal budget to 4 trillion dollars per year.
Vegan Mayonnaise for all.
I think you mean Vegan Mayo
http://reason.com/blog/2014/11.....-becauseco
Certified GMO Free Canadian Rapeseed Oil
Just Mayo is outrageously delicious, better for your body, for your wallet, and for the planet. It's a piece of the philosophy to make the good thing a little easier.
Seeds of Rape!
Do we have affirmative consent?
The Nation,mourning the loss of the U.S.S.R ,since 1990
In Republican Party Reptile P.J. O'Rourke wrote a great account of his trip on a Nation-sponsored Volga Peace Cruise in the early '80s.
"You can't get a good cigar in Cuba or decent vodka in Russia. That about wraps it up for socialism."
I seem to recall he also mentioned no good Chinese take-out in China.
The only problem is, the food we describe as 'Chinese' in this country was invented here, inspired by components from the home country, to cater to American tastes. So of course you aren't going to find American-style Chinese food in China.
"the food we describe as 'Chinese' in this country was invented here, inspired by components from the home country, to cater to American tastes."
Not what I found when I was last there.
I love PJ, but, when I was in the Soviet Union (about the same time he wrote this) I got some damn good Cuban cigars and excellent Russian vodka. The berioskas were a funnel for foreign currency. This was '84 so I know things are different now ...
...midterms solely to the GOP's negativism
yes. A 22% increase in my health insurance premium (again for 2015) will make you pretty negative...whether you're GOP or not.
"Katrina vanden Heuvel chalks up broad Republican gains in the midterms solely to the GOP's negativism."
DOOM SHALL PREVAIL!
" because both conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats have gotten to implement their visions in the recent past."
Me and Nick must have vastly different definitions of the word conservative. Most of my memory from that time involve a bunch of neo-cons doubling the debt, growing the size and scope of government, and getting the US involved in shit hole countries on the other side of the world.
I think the word liberal doesn't mean what most people think it does in this case either.
Maybe those terms should have been replaced with NeoCons and Progs.
That would make more sense.
No True Conservative!
Mr. Non-partisan himself has graced the thread with his pure objectivity. What an honor.
Fuck you Bo. Every now and then you appear to have some sense but most of the time you are just a slightly smarter turdpolisher.
Why so defensive about conservatism? My point was there's no great divergence from conservatism in the 'neoconservatism' brand we saw recently.
Really? When I think of 'conservatives' I think of someone like Burke or publications like The American Conservative. Quite different from Neoconservatives.
Running up debts, growing the size and scope of government and getting the US involved in foreign adventurism are not some new facets of conservatism.
That isn't traditional conservatism. Robert Taft is probably a good representative of an American conservative.
I'm not sure about that. Think about President McKinley. Was he a conservative? He oversaw our foray into foreign imperialism. Burke himself championed getting involved in the French Revolution.
McKinley was not a conservative, but Cleveland was. Gosh, it's almost like political party and political ideology aren't the same thing!
Millennial -
You forgot. You're not arguing some objective definition of conservative. You are arguing whatever Bo wants it to mean in order for Bo to prove to himself that everyone here is a hard core conservative and without our brilliant and witty savior, Bo, the libertarian party would fold, Reason would merge with the Weekly Standard, and all would be lost.
Lucky for you Bo's understanding is ever shifting and has zero to do with objectivity or reality, so you sort of win by default.
That "Voters are stoopid" meme again... They're easily swayed by negativism and other schemes.
But fully deserving of the political authority they wield en masse. Right?
Not smart enough to be trusted with spending their own money, but intelligent enough to elect the "proper" politicians to do it for them.
That "Voters are stoopid" meme again
It works for Jonathon Gruber.
Everyone likes the idea of not having the GOP in charge until the alternative happens. And vice versa.
It's just undisputed that the main thing that Republicans ran on, and Democrats ran from, was Obama's signature achievement. So this lady thinks if only that could have been multiplied things would have been better for the Democrats? Good grief.
Time put McConnell on the cover with the word "CHANGE." The guy's been in D.C. for 30 years!!!
ha. I love those stupid sons of bitches.
A third Gruber video. He's the gift that keeps on giving.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/12/.....c=politics
A damned fool. Is it possible Gruber is some kind of double agent that has been playing this game for a long time?
Maybe, his sole purpose is to make Obama/the Dems look foolish. Either way he's doing a great job.
He is NOT NOT NOT NOT a 'fool'.
He is blissful. And arrogant. And MIT. And Washington. And government tool. Christ, bitches, there is something to white, rich, elevated politics... it is a class of its own...
Interesting... it's like Chicago super rich politics. Months of fund-raising for millionaires to give to causes and not a single one of the dumb shills gets it. They give to relieve the conscience.
Gruber lied because he is supra-weak, BUT elite.
The inside of this thing is rather sick.
Oh, did it take 3 released videos for cnn to finally report it?
Maybe Obama will finally take notice of it.
only when the NY Times tells him what to think, I assume.
So after tomorrow's paper is delivered?
He has only been interested in holding whistleblowers accountable thus far. Do you think it is going to change now?
We can only hope.
Maybe Obama will finally take notice of [Gruber].
I'd like to see Biden turn this into a monster. Open-mic "The American people were really fucking gullible" or something like that.
Maybe Obama will finally take notice of it.
White House spokeswoman disavows Gruber. Claims transparency is key to Obamacare.
They keep using that word. I do not think it means what they think it means.
What would Deen's Peen do? Sploodge, beat, slap, lick, thump, rock, thrust, and enjoy. Nothing about politics is about living to enjoi.
It's about the clenched fist on the neck of freedom... in the name of millions of voters...
Modern freedom is being hung on the votes of millions.
Didn't John once say he was attracted to Katrina Vanden Heuvel?
I'm still trying to figure out how that's possible.
Is Irish gellato?
If this is slang for something I have to what it is.
Know, know, know.
I recall seeing some flattering pics of her on the 'net - I'm guess they were taken on a good day many years ago.
I think this is right. Everyone's young at one time.
Katrina was hot until she was done in by senescence and HDTV
She has permanent duck face. Annoying.
I had an unholy lust for her for quite awhile. She was quite the looker in the last millennium. I always figured that an obscenely wealthy, stupid woman, would be good for me.
"...because both conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats have gotten to implement their visions in the recent past..."
Exactly when was it that conservative Republicans were able to implement their visions?
Bush wasn't remotely close to being a Conservative Republican.
No Conservative Republican would have enacted another entitlement program as Bush did with Medicare Part D.
No true Conservative!
Pretty sure it's been pointed out since 1999 that compassionate conservatism wasn't particularly conservative, but you're an idiot so whatever.
"You mean like Democrats?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkzV5AIK8iM
That never gets old.