73 Percent of Americans Favor Restoring Voting Rights for Nonviolent Drug Offenders
According to the latest Reason-Rupe poll, 73 percent of Americans favor restoring voting rights to nonviolent drug offenders who have served their sentences, with strong majorities among Democrats, Independents, and Republicans.
Eighty-two percent of Democrats, 71 percent of Independents, and 66 percent of Republicans all favor allowing nonviolent drug offenders who have served their sentences to vote.
There were discrepancies between those of different racial/ethnic backgrounds, however. An overwhelming number of African-Americans—91 percent—are in favor. However, 72 percent of whites, and only 66 percent of Hispanics are in favor. Still, there are clear majorities among all three groups polled.
As things currently stand, only two states—Maine and Vermont—have no restrictions on voting for convicted felons. In these states, felons may even vote absentee from jail or prison. However, the majority of states pose some restrictions on voting for those who have been convicted of a felony. In eight states, voting restrictions are imposed on offenders incarcerated for a misdemeanor offense.
Thirteen states and Washington D.C. restore voting rights for all convicted felons after they are released from prison or jail. In four states, voting rights are restored for convicted felons after they complete their term of incarceration and parole, and 20 states allow voting rights to be restored after convicted felons complete their term of incarceration, parole and/or probation.
Of the remaining states, various restrictions are imposed on those who have been convicted of felony offenses. Some states, like Virginia, allow only those who were convicted of a nonviolent felony to have their voting rights restored after completing their prison sentence, parole and/or probation, and have paid all of their court costs. Other states allow felons to have their voting rights restored only after receiving an executive pardon from the governor.
Florida, the state with the toughest voting restrictions for convicted felons, prohibits anyone convicted of any felony offense—even nonviolent offenders—from ever voting. As a result, it has the largest number of disenfranchised citizens out of any state in the country. As of 2012, 10.4 percent of the entire state population was prohibited from voting due to a felony conviction.
According to data provided by the Sentencing Project, roughly 5.85 million American citizens were disenfranchised through the criminal justice system in 2012. At that time, roughly 7 percent of all African-Americans had lost their right to vote.
Public opinion seems to side with Senator Rand Paul, who recently filed legislation that would allow individuals convicted of a nonviolent criminal offense to vote in federal elections after they have completed their terms of incarceration and parole/probation. That legislation, however, only has a two percent chance of being enacted according to govtrack.us.
There's no real public safety threat in allowing those who have completed their sentences—even those convicted of violent crimes—from expressing themselves at the ballot box. Still, it's a welcome sign that public opinion overwhelmingly favors allowing at least nonviolent drug offenders to vote after they've served their sentences.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Agree - let 'em vote if they want. NEXT!
More important: They're still blaming the economy on the weather. Still. On the weather.
Seeing as voting is pointless and statistically meaningless, it might be better for non-violent felons to get their 2nd Amendment rights restored instead. Then at least they can legally defend themselves.
MADMAN!!
They can. I mean, there's a process, but they can. I used to know a former felon (nonviolent) who got his gun rights back.
Someone alert Dianne Feinstein.
That question may make its way onto a future poll. We'll see.
Sadly, I doubt that the results for that one--should you do it--will be as positive as this one. But you never know.
Zoidberg: You know, Fry, you could join a third party, maybe.
Amy: Only weirdos and mutants join third parties.
Zoidberg: Really? I'd better keep an eye out at the next meeting.
Fry: What party do you belong to, Bender?
Bender: I'm not allowed to vote.
Fry: 'Cause you're a robot?
Bender: No, convicted felon.
Forgive me for focusing on the wrong part, but isn't this a little ridiculous:
In these states [Maine and Vermont], felons may even vote absentee from jail or prison.
You need a chezburger jammed down yo throat... jes sezzin....
they should also get their right to work back.
Would these majorities hold steady if included in this restoration were firearm rights?
Hello?
HELLO?
I didn't think so.