Washington's Marijuana Lottery: Good Odds, Big Cash Prizes

When the Washinton State Liquor Control Board (LCB) decided to license just 334 marijuana stores, it made permission to operate such a business a scarce and valuable commodity. But when the LCB received more than 2,100 applications for those 334 licenses, it did not cash in on that artificial value by auctioning them. Instead it used lotteries to winnow the field in each jurisdiction with more applications than licenses (which was most of them), saying applicants who received the lowest numbers would get first crack at qualifying. Guess what happened next.
The Kitsap Sun reports that David Comeau, who drew the second lowest number in the lottery for Bremerton, where the LCB plans to issue two retail licenses, recently sold his business, Better Buds, to C&C Shop LLC, which came in 13th, for $150,000. Comeau, whose business exists mostly on paper, will also receive 10 percent of C&C's net monthly revenue (or $10,000 a month, if the revenue is lower than that) for as long as the company's store is open. Since the application fee was $250, that's a pretty good payoff. Plus Comeau was competing against just 15 other applicants for Bremerton's two licenses. Those have to be the best odds ever in a state lottery. "We just got really, really lucky," Comeau told the Sun. "It was absolutely like winning a real lottery." He is not the only one to recognize the value of such luck:
Other marijuana lottery "winners" are rushing to sell. Several businesses were listed this week on Craigslist after placing high in retail lotteries. One was asking $1 million, another wanted $2.5 million. Comeau predicted a "frenzy" of marijuana business acquisitions this month.
John Davis, who operates two medical marijuana dispensaries in Seattle, applied for three of the 21 retai licenses allocated to that city. The LCB rejected one application, claiming (erroneously, according to Davis) that the location was in a "forbidden zone" (i.e., within 1,000 feet of a school, park, playground, library, recreation center, child care center, or game arcade). The other two applications placed 52nd and 96th. Although Davis' chances do not look good, some of the businesses higher on the list may not qualify for licenses, since they still have to clear background checks, get their operating plans approved, and pass inspections. "Some of them will go through the next screen and make it," Davis tells me, "but just don't have the know-how, the financing, the ties to a location that will allow them to open. I think there are a lot of people who were gaming the system, who don't really have hope of opening. A number of the people that are in the lottery now are simply in the lottery hoping to get a [number] they can sell."
Technically, they are selling their businesses, which happen to come with a marijuana license (or a good shot at one), just like a TV or radio station comes with a broadcast license or a restaurant comes with a liquor license. And just like the initial recipients of New York City's taxi medallions, the winners of Washington's marijuana lottery are enjoying a windfall thanks to legally mandated scarcity.
[Thanks to Marc Sandhaus for the tip.]
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This isn't nearly as good as just picking your favored crony!
/Martin O'Malley.
Given a choice between the state cashing a big check for auctioning off the licenses, and private parties cashing big checks for winning the license lottery, well, I'm thinking I prefer the latter.
With the stipulation that NO fucking licensing at all would be vastly better, of course ...
Second to that would be "shall issue" licenses to anyone who qualifies without limitation.
Which is how taxis, if we are going to license them, should work too.
Of course, Uber and Lyft and plenty of systems before them seem to be proving that taxi licenses were never necessary to begin with.
With the stipulation that NO fucking licensing at all would be vastly better, of course ...
Well, yeah.
This is another iteration of "the people of Washington voted themselves MJ, bypassing the State Legislature, so in revenge the Lege is making implementation as difficult as possible." This bit was particularly clumsy.
Everyone knows nothing grows in the Forbidden Zone.
"The Forbidden Zone was once a paradise. Your breed made a desert of it, ages ago."
They really will never learn will they
Bask in the freedom of the 21st century! Only valid permits allowed. Please register at the desk and take a number. No smoking, no drinking, no loud talking. First amendment area is across the parking lot in the dirt area next to the dumpsters. First amendment area closed from 9pm to 8am. Violators will be prosecuted. A valid speech permit may be acquired at the desk between 1:45pm and 4:15pm Mondays and Thursdays. Hours subject to change without notice. Taxes are due no later than the 15th of each month. Enjoy your freedom.
You left out the obligatory, "Thank you for your compliance."
Why on earth, would they limit the number of dealers? Why don't they limit the number of grocery stores? Gas stations? TV repair shops?
Forget the bureaucrats; grow your own MJ; it is easy. Punish the cronies!