Cop Shoots Dog. No, Wait! He Shoots Himself. Dog Is Fine.

I've been nervously waiting for a dog owner whose animal has been killed by police to try to even the score—it's inevitable, even though the outcome will be not so swell for the outraged dog lover. But what if a canicidal cop took active measures to prevent himself from poaching a pooch? Fantasy, you say?
Nope. It happened.
In Riverside County, California, "a large pitbull breed dog attacked" an unnamed sheriff's deputy according to a police spokesman who seems to be having a little trouble taking his own script seriously. "In defense of himself…he fired one round at the dog, and inadvertently struck himself in the leg."
The dog's owner, Jorge Rodriguez, told NBC Los Angeles that the "attack" consisted of his dog barking at the stranger. Rodriguez almost managed to completely suppress his smirk while expressing sympathy for the deputy who tried to kill his dog.
The dog, named Precious and subsequently seen in NBC Los Angeles' news video romping with children in a fenced yard, escaped injury. The "large pitbull breed dog" appears to reach just about knee-high on what looks like a 6-year-old.
According to KCLA, the deputy is fine, beyond his wounded pride and the inevitable ribbing he'll take back at the cop shop. "The deputy was hospitalized with non-life threatening injuries. He was not bitten."
The deputy wasn't even licked, which the video suggests is a more likely fate after an encounter with Precious.
And Precious' family is just fine too, since nobody could find any wrongdoing to hang on them. "KCAL9's Tom Wait reports the dog was not hit or injured and police will not be taking any further action against the dog or its owner, who was not the person being served."
A 2012 formal report from the U.S. Department of Justice's Community Oriented Policing Services, The Problem of Dog-Related Incidents and Encounters, advises that "shooting a dog should always be the option of last resort. The safety of fellow officers and bystanders is put at risk in such situations, and when a law enforcement officer shoots a dog that does not constitute a serious threat, community trust is eroded and the department is opened to potential lawsuits and other legal action."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This is about the best potential outcome - what's the catch?
Could have been better. He could have hit an artery.
I could not possibly agree more.
Taxpayers will now pay disability to the officer for the rest of his life while he goes skiing on that leg, or works in another jurisdiction in the same job he "can't do anymore".
Auric, you must be taking crazy pills. Nothing like that ever happens.
http://nypost.com/2012/03/26/d.....r-rescuer/
He's living out his dreams, in spite of his crippling disability.. He's sooo courageous, an true example for us all. Why would you take that from him? Why do you hate the handicapped?
Coincidentally, my cousin who actually IS handicapped with cerebral palsy is living out her dream. She has been living in the UK since 2004, has collaborated on works that are performed at the Globe Theater, written a book, made documentaries, and spoke at the TEDx Conference is Las Vegas last week.
She has done all of this on her own without the taxpayers footing the bill. My aunt and uncle don't even pay for it. So yeah, fuck this guy.
Apparently, this guy seems to be beyond shaming, which appears to be the extent of reprisal against such an egregious shitbag in NYC. With any luck, he'll fall into an open manhole, and the world will move on...
I'm hoping he takes a 200 mph tire to the teeth.
Yeah but that's not all downside.
I mean taxpyers were going to be paying his salary one way or another and which is worse, paying him and having him out on the streets "working" or paying him and now having him out on the streets?
Maybe we could expand on it?
Sort of like the stupid gun buybacks they are always engaging in. A cop buyback where we pay them just to go home and stop policing?
It's worth to be paying him and the guy they hired to replace him.
The only thing worse would be no EDIT BUTTON!
You fucking with us, 2Chilly?
Shoot yourself first, ask questions later.
This seems like an appropriate reason to listen to Rain Dogs all day at work today.
"But I've always kinda been partial to calling myself up on the phone and asking myself out, you know? Oh yeah, you call yourself up too huh? Yeah, well one thing about it, your always around. Yeah I know, yeah you ask yourself out, you know, some class joint somewhere. The Buretto King or something, you know. Well I ain't cheap you know. Take yourself out for a couple of drinks maybe. Then there'd be some provocative conversation on the way home. Park in front of the house you know. Oh yeah, you smoothly put a little nice music on, maybe you put on like uh, you know, like shopping music, something thats not too interruptive you know and then uh slide over real nice and say 'Oh I think you have something in your eye'. Well maybe it's not that romantic with you but Christ I don't know, you know I get into it you know. Take myself up to the porch, take myself inside or maybe uh, or may get a little something, a brandy snifter or something. 'Would like you like to listen to some of my back records? I got something here' Uh Well usually about 2.30 in the morning you've ended up taking advantage of yourself. There ain't no way around that you know. Yeah, making a scene with a magazine, there ain't no way around. I'll confess you know, I'm no different you know. I'm not weird about it or anything, I don't tie myself up first. I just kinda spend a little time with myself"
This reporter is big in Japan.
Reverse Puppycide! Nice! Made my Friday, thanks.
He's lucky that cop didn't die, otherwise the owner would be charged with the cop's death because of a made up felony charge ("attacking" the officer).
One of our noble Heroes in Blue?, killed in the line of duty, while protecting us all from evil would be the headline. The torrential downpour of new laws and regulations crafted by police unions and shilled by politicians afterwards (covering everything but individual stupidity/responsibility) would be staggering... Because, they just want to make it home after their shifts...
Ha ha
+ 1 Nelson
First he wet himself, then he shot himself.
The dog, named Precious and subsequently seen in NBC's NBC Los Angeles's news video romping with children in a fenced yard, escaped injury. The "large pitbull breed dog" appears to reach just about knee-high on what looks like a 6-year-old.
Kudos to the NBC station for cutting to the kids playing with what looks like a lapdog wagging its tail at the kids as the dipshit is saying "large pitbull breed dog".
Ha, check out in the NBC video as the copper, being loaded into the ambulance, crosses his wrists in front of him like he's ejecting from an F-14. GET THAT MAN A MEDAL.
He gets the dumbass of the day award. He didn't even qualify for dumbass of the week.
OK, does A2 mean we can arm dogs along with bears?
They are not People or Bears, and thus can only carry arms when serving in the militia.
What kind of bears are we talking about here? I've been confused for a bear when I've gone out in Boys Town with friends, being a 6'1", burly fella with a good amount of scruff. If these are the bears you are referring to, then yes, we should arm them.
I have a tear in my eye...
Of joy.
If only it could have been fatal.
If only it could have been fatal.
Hopefully the humiliation and shame will prove fatal later down the road.
Reason is the number one reason that taking my dog to the off leash dog friendly open space near my home makes me extremely nervous. My dog (a pit and gsd mix) is a giant pansy, but almost every time he sees someone at there that looks out of place (someone dressed oddly, without a dog), he barks for about 10s until I tell him to back off. A cop is going to show up one day and come down the hill for no good reason, my dog will bark to alert me, and he will die.
Let's not forget theclassics, too.
Some things never get old, but I have to admit... he took it like a champ.
Some things never get old, but I have to admit... he took it like a champ.
But the ensuing humiliation, well, he took that like a little bitch.
After the video was leaked, he sued the DEA for humiliation, emotional cruelty, yada yada.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/b.....g-gun-demo
Oh, and this!
so that's the name of that song, thx
Between firemen, EMT's and other cops, exactly how many of our noble public servants are in that video ? A dozen ? In fairness, it's a wonder SWAT didn't show up when the "officer down" call went out.
Its a shame he didn't shoot his own nuts off... well... he apparently doesn't haven't any anyways.
Nice of him to intentionally try and miss the dog. Props to Tuccille for creating the much-needed word canicidal (which currently had a red squiggly line beneath, but may not in years to come).
See, the assumption is that dog shootings are about panicky cops "defending" themselves. They're not. Dog shooting are about terrifying the target into submission with the implicit threat "you're next".
Cop shoots himself in the leg.....Precious.
This story is good news on so many levels ....
this guy seems to be beyond shaming, which appears to be the extent of reprisal against such an egregious shitbag in NYC
Take yourself out for a couple of drinks maybe.
Idiot cop - Amazing he didn't accidentally shoot any of those kids. No Social IQ or Emotional Empathy. Don't you know dogs naturally behave like that? They will always protect & defend their family against approaching strangers. But many cops are ignorant or just don't care -- shoot first, consequences later, but they don't care about the consequences, or the kids, or the family's feelings, etc. These kind of cops who wrongfully shoot dogs are only militant robots trained to react, not think, or know anything about canine nature. Stupid gun-heads. But hey, guns & violence are the culturally indoctrinated American Way, right?
I've been thinking about getting an autoloader lately, and that brand is not on the list.
I've shot worse pistols.
Why?
IMHO, most accurate pistol I've ever shot.
I want something with an actual safety.
Carry it unloaded, with trigger and breech installed...
I want something with an actual safety.
Good gun-handling skills will ensure you never have a negligent discharge, regardless of whether or not the gun has any user-activated safeties. Besides, in a hairy moment, when you've got a split second to react, the fewer things you have to fumble with, the better off you are.
My belief is that when choosing a defensive weapon, simplicity of use should be right up there with reliability as the top considerations.
Get yourself a beretta px4. Da/sa,
Has a safety, great shooter.
with trigger and breech *locks* installed
What's the point of carrying an unloaded firearm? To club an attacker with it?
Make them laugh themselves to death.
"What's the point of carrying an unloaded firearm?
Absolutely none...
"To club an attacker with it?"
I would recommend against it..
I'm thinking about a carry gun, and would rather carry something with a safety.
I've been looking at some of the S&W M&Ps; lately. Not sure what I'd go for (model or caliber wise). I have at least one example of the major calibers in other pistols (Sig, 1911, Glock, etc.), and a few not so popular ones as well. This is more of a "Why the hell *shouldn't* I buy a pistol this month?" sort of thing.
Which caliber?
I carry a Ruger .380 LCP with one in the pipe in a pocket holster. No safety. Though long and hard about it, but I just can't see any way that trigger gets pulled in the holster.
And don't all the Glocks have the fingertip safety on the trigger?
Haven't decided. Leaning towards .40, though some of the .380 pocket pistols are kinda cool. Still in the "thinking about it" stage.
I've got a S&W Model 10 (.38SP with 4" barrel) and I love it. Plan on burning through a box of 50 rounds with the wife on Sunday.
The reason is that I was considering something more along the lines of a "pocket" pistol, as opposed to something holstered.
What about not shooting yourself when trying to draw it in a high-pressure situation?
Yep I was taught a long time ago that the best safety of any weapon is the gray matter between your ears.
Haven't decided. Leaning towards .40, though some of the .380 pocket pistols are kinda cool. Still in the "thinking about it" stage.
If you're willing to consider .380, maybe give some thought to 9mm as well. You get more rounds in the same size pistol, ammo is cheaper, and the recoil is a lot less "snappy" than you'll get from the ,40 S&W.
I'm a big fan of the Seecamp in cal .380, a little expensive, but well built. .40's stay at home...
I hadn't even thought about a pocket holster. That changes things a bit.
And don't all the Glocks have the fingertip safety on the trigger?
Yep. That's what keeps the trigger from traveling to the rear if the pistol is dropped.
"I carry a Ruger .380 LCP with one in the pipe in a pocket holster. No safety. Though long and hard about it, but I just can't see any way that trigger gets pulled in the holster."
Exactly this.
Looked up the serial on mine and it was made somewhere between 1948 and 1950. Looks it too. Great gun. Not worth much money, but I'll never get rid of it.
DeSantis has a decent line of low-cost pocket holsters.
They are worth more than you might think..
Gotta love the classic revolvers. I've got a Model 10 also, love it.
Also a matched set of K-22 and K-38 Masterpieces with 6" barrels. Those are really sweet.
They are worth more than you might think..
Condition is everything, and this one is worn.
I had a Beretta 92 (9mm) and traded "up" to a 96 (.40). Worst mistake I've ever made.
Thought I wanted a little more knock down power. What I got was a HUGE decrease in accuracy. Don't know if I just got a lemon gun or if it was the extra kick throwing me off. I could shoot the fuck out of that 9. It was like pointing your finger. Never recovered that level of accuracy with the 40.
And as far as a carry gun...
The best gun to carry is one you will carry. If it won't easily fit in my pocket on the way out the door, I'm probably not going to make the effort. Hence, my peashooter.
"If you're willing to consider .380, maybe give some thought to 9mm as well. You get more rounds in the same size pistol,"
Bullshit, there is not a single 9mm that is the same size as a 380 that has more rounds. That's just nonsense, and I know, I've looked and handled every combination of the things that I can think of.
It's close enough that they can be compared, but the 9's are bigger. They simply are. I do not know why you needed to make shit up to convinvce him.
I was thinking towards .40 because of stopping power, but leaning towards .380 because of ease of carry. Now I'm leaning even further towards .380.
I had a Beretta 92 (9mm) and traded "up" to a 96 (.40). Worst mistake I've ever made.
I just don't like .40 at all. The recoil in every .40 I've ever shot has been very snappy, which made it unpleasant to shoot. I think it has something to do with the higher chamber pressures generated by the cartridge. Hell, even .45, with that much bigger bullet, is more fun to shoot; the recoil is more like a big, steady "push."
I've been thinking about buying a 92F or an actual M9, simply out of nostalgia (I used to carry one in the Marines).
I was thinking towards .40 because of stopping power, but leaning towards .380 because of ease of carry. Now I'm leaning even further towards .380.
With 9mm, you're you're getting a good compromise between the two. And a good 9mm defensive round will give you all the oomph you need when it comes to persuading someone to stop attacking you.
You like 9mm. I get it.
I think the K-22 is the finest revolver I have ever shot.
Good gun-handling skills, once ingrained, mean you won't have your finger on the trigger until you're ready to fire. Personally, I'd rather deal with the slightly increased risk of shooting myself in the leg (and that's if that risk is mitigated by having a user-activated safety) than the possibility of pulling the trigger and having nothing happen because the safety is on, which I can easily see happening to someone under that much duress.
You like 9mm. I get it.
Well, yeah. And so do lots of other people who know a lot more about this stuff than I do. You seem fairly new to the idea of a carry gun, and based on some of the criteria you mentioned, and the fact that you were debating between .380 and .40 S&W, I thought pointing you toward a good "compromise" round would be helpful.
Bullshit, there is not a single 9mm that is the same size as a 380 that has more rounds. That's just nonsense, and I know, I've looked and handled every combination of the things that I can think of.
You're right, I was unclear on that point. Sarcasmic also mentioned that he was considering .40 S&W as well, and my point about increased capacity was with regard to that pistol.
Bullshit, there is not a single 9mm that is the same size as a 380 that has more rounds. That's just nonsense, and I know, I've looked and handled every combination of the things that I can think of.
You're right, I was unclear on that point. Sarcasmic also mentioned that he was considering .40 S&W as well, and my point about increased capacity was with regard to that pistol.
I thought pointing you toward a good "compromise" round would be helpful.
I understand, but I got it the first time. The reason I'm leaning more towards .380 is size. If it was ever to be used, it likely would be point blank range where the difference in power between .380 and 9mm wouldn't make much of a difference. This isn't something I'll be taking to the range. So I think I'd rather sacrifice a little power for concealability.
The recoil in every .40 I've ever shot has been very snappy, which made it unpleasant to shoot.
I've only shot one .40 and that was my impression as well. I thought it was just particular pistol, not the caliber in general. OK then, .40 is off the table.
I've only shot one .40 and that was my impression as well. I thought it was just particular pistol, not the caliber in general. OK then, .40 is off the table.
I've shot a few, including a SIG P226, which is a full-size pistol. Even then, it was just plain unpleasant. And when it's in a subcompact frame, like a Glock 27, it's a lot worse.
But, some people swear by them. From what I've read, it is still an excellent defensive round. Personally, I want something that I'm going to actually enjoy practicing with.
Personally, I want something that I'm going to actually enjoy practicing with.
Exactly. Which is why I love my Model 10. That thing is really fun to shoot.
Exactly. Which is why I love my Model 10. That thing is really fun to shoot.
A .38, when it's in a medium-size frame like the Model 10, is more fun to shoot (for me, at least) than any other caliber except .22LR. A Model 10 range rental was the first major-caliber handgun I ever shot. I just went to the S&W website, and to my surprise, it's still in production.
Which is again why I'm thinking .380. 100 grain cartridges through that small frame would be more manageable, maybe even fun.
Even pocket pistols need holsters. They keep crap out of the trigger guard, make it so less lint gets into the mechanism, and keep the firearm from printing.