Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

In Defense of Millennials and Individualism

Forget Justin Bieber. Don't Hate on "Generation Selfie"

Nick Gillespie | 3.23.2014 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Note: This article originally appeared at The Daily Beast on March 18, 2014. Read it there.

There is suddenly much panic about the rise of the "selfie" generation. But millennials are simply rejecting the worn-out trappings and organizations of the Establishment—and quite right too.

That discomfort you're sensing all around you? It's the American Establishment loading its Depends diapers over the prospect of a younger generation that is turning its back on political parties and other zombified artifacts of our glorious past.

On the heels of the Pew Research report titled "Millennials in Adulthood," two leading New York Times columnists have penned anxious articles sweating it out over the "The Self(ie) Generation" and "The Age of Individualism."

"Millennials (defined by Pew as Americans ages 18 to 33) are drifting away from traditional institutions—political, religious and cultural," muses Charles M. Blow, who sees a "a generation in which institutions are subordinate to the individual… This is not only the generation of the self; it's the generation of the selfie." Oh noes! And it's only gonna get worse: "In the future," worries Ross Douthat, "there will be only one 'ism'—Individualism—and its rule will never end. As for religion, it shall decline; as for marriage, it shall be postponed; as for ideologies, they shall be rejected; as for patriotism, it shall be abandoned; as for strangers, they shall be distrusted. Only pot, selfies and Facebook will abide."

Does it strike anyone else as odd that selfies—clearly less the product of rising narcissism and more the product of the same awesome technology that empowers citizens to capture cops beating the shit of innocent people—have emerged as this year's droopy pants, backwards baseball caps, or visible piercings, as a shorthand for all that is wrong with today's youth? Getting bent out of shape over selfies may just be the ultimate #firstworldproblem.

The Pew study itself leads with charts titled "Millennials: Unmoored from Institutions" (specifically, 50 percent call themselves political independents and 29 percent are religiously unaffiliated) and foregrounds that just 19 percent believe "most people can be trusted" (this compares with 31 percent of Gen Xers and 40 percent of Baby Boomers). Only 49 percent of Millennials define themselves as patriotic, which is far fewer than Gen Xers (64 percent) and Boomers (75 percent). Whoda thunk that growing up against the background of two inconclusive, ill-conceived, and poorly prosecuted wars might have soured Millennials on the old Red, White, and Blue?

It's easy to understand why folks at The New York Times and, say, at Democratic and Republican headquarters, and the National Council of Churches are worried about all this. After all, it's their "traditional institutions" that are being left behind like Mayan ruins. But who can blame Millennials for, say, vacating worn-out, pre-Civil War political brands such as the Democrats and Republicans, two groups that are about as relevant and dependable as your father's Oldsmobile?

The Dems and the Reps have been leaking market share for decades, the inevitable byproduct of wielding power directly at odds with the promises that got them elected in the first place. Far from being a limited-government conservative, George W. Bush and his Republican Congress was a big government disaster that massively increased federal spending across the board, passed record-setting levels of economically significant regulations, and embroiled the country in two decade-long wars. Barack Obama expanded the very surveillance programs he denounced while running for president, acted foolishly at home and abroad by bailing out bankers like nobody's business and droning the hell out of countries with which we weren't at war, and had to be dragged kicking and screaming into support for gay marriage and pot legalization (and the jury is still out on the latter).

His signature health-care plan is just as unpopular among Millennials (54 percent say they don't approve) as it is among the rest of us (also 54 percent, says Pew). Of course it is: It's based on a command-and-control model of economics and politics that should have gone out of fashion for good when the Soviet Union collapsed. Who the hell can take universal mandates seriously in an age where all the cutting-edge action is based around persuasion and personalization? Say what you will be about Facebook and other aspects of what Douthat calls "the online Panopticon," but social media is chock full of opt-outs.

More than most age groups, Millennials know that they are being set up for a generational scam of epic proportions. Indeed, Obamacare's individual market is explicitly predicated upon overcharging relatively younger, healthier, poorer people to subsidize lower premiums for relatively older, sicker, and wealthier people (who really hit the jackpot when they turn 65 and get Medicare). A full 51 percent of Millennials believe they won't receive any Social Security benefits and an additional 39 percent say that they will receive reduced benefits if they get anything at all. That's not even factoring in analysis by Urban Institute researchers who show that virtually all workers getting Social Security after 2009 will get less out of the system than they paid in. Wait until that sinks in on younger Americans.

Given that, the real question isn't why most Millennials are turning their backs on institutions, it's why any of them are still clinging to the old ways? The Pew study documents instances of what I would charitably call the confusion of youth (despite huge and ongoing disappointment with Obama, the Affordable Care Act, and political parties, 53 percent of Millennials still say they want "a bigger government that provides more services"). But it also shows an optimism that should be genuinely bracing and energizing for Americans of all ages.

Millennials in 2014—still slogging through an anemic recovery to an awful recession—are as optimistic about their future as Gen Xers were in 1994. That was a time when the U.S. economy was revving up, the Internet was becoming a mass medium, and the post-Cold War world has seemingly slipped the noose of history. Eighty-five percent of Millennials say they either already earn enough or will earn enough "to lead the kind of life they want," compared to 68 percent of Gen Xers and 60 percent of Boomers.

Maybe it's because Millennials are too busy taking all those selfies to pay attention to the world going to shit around them. More likely, it's precisely because they are turning away from played-out institutions in American life and turning to a future in which individuals are free to form new communities and new ways of navigating a world that is as uncertain as it is untapped.

Note: This article originally appeared at The Daily Beast on March 18, 2014. Read it there.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Cathy Young on Russia, Where the Real Fascists Are

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsMillennialsNanny StateWar on DrugsScience & TechnologyCultureCivil LibertiesEconomicsPolicyLibertarian History/PhilosophyEntitlements
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (160)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. wareagle   11 years ago

    this movie has played out forever - the older generation is perpetually bitching about the ways of the younger folks.

    1. Episiarch   11 years ago

      Exactly. Wake me when an older "generation" doesn't flip their lids about the kids these days. I'd better get off their lawn first.

      1. Grand Moff Serious Man   11 years ago

        It looks like the younger generation agrees that the original Star Wars trilogy was better than the prequels.

        So that's something.

        1. Episiarch   11 years ago

          I don't think there is anyone retarded enough to think the prequels are better than the original. Except maybe Canadians.

          1. Stephencj   11 years ago

            Did anyone else notice that the prequels are just one big spoiler for the "I am your father" moment in the Empire Strikes Back?

            1. KDN   11 years ago

              Correct. If you want to show the whole story to someone that is completely unfamiliar, apparently the best way to do it is IV, V, I, II, III, VI.

        2. Sunmonocle Backwards Tophat   11 years ago

          But do they believe the originals are better than the remasters? It would be no surprise to me that the Generation of Greed would prefer Greedo shooting first.

      2. nancy284   11 years ago

        Start earning with Google. Just work for few hours and have more time with friends and family. I earn up to $500 per week. Its actually the nicest job Ive had. Linked Here http://www.Pow6.com

      3. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

        How about the cultural revolution where the kids were flipping their lids that the older generation weren't orthodox enough?

        1. Grand Moff Serious Man   11 years ago

          That was more like kids flipping their lids that their parents and grandparents were still clinging to Confucianism, Buddhism, or capitalism rather than embracing Chairman Mao's vision.

          1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

            From what I've read they went after a lot of local party officials, administrators, and educators, i.e. true believers.

            That they held onto 99% of the party doctrine the fact that they bitterly clung to unorthodox ideas, such as 'maybe bach wasn't so bad' they were singled out for abuse.

            The whole point of the CR was for the doddering Mao to regain some of the power that party members and the military had usurped in his advancing age. Therefore new and stricter dogma was created that could only be adopted by the young, who would then in turn push out the old who threatened Mao's power. The whole thing was an internecine power squabble that had little to do with any actual capitalist and religious threats to the state.

            That's how I've read it anyways.

            1. wwhorton   11 years ago

              I'm all late, but I minored in Chinese history and one of my professors lived in China at the time. Following the Great Leap Forward Mao lost a lot of power within the CCP. Moderates like Deng Xiaopeng and Liu Shaoqi were on the rise, advocating moderation and economic reforms.

              Depending on your read on Mao, one of two things happened. Either he genuinely believed that the GLF failed because the Chinese people failed to embrace Chinese communism fully, partly because of lingering remnants of traditional Chinese culture and partly because of capitalist saboteurs, or he recognized that there was an entire generation of young Chinese who were raised to worship him as a god and turned them against the rest of the Party so as to reclaim his spot as top dog.

              At any rate, from the younger generation's perspective, it was most certainly a revolutionary movement. A lot of the propaganda speaks in terms of the youth needing to be Mao's revolutionary army, and having the revolutionary spark that their parents lost.

      4. John C. Randolph   11 years ago

        I remember when the media were clutching their pearls and bitching about the "me generation" of the 1970s.

        -jcr

    2. PM   11 years ago

      "Every generation imagines itself to be more intelligent than the one that went before it and wiser than the one that comes after it"

    3. Homple   11 years ago

      Funny, I heard the same spiel from every dumbass boomer I grew up with. Note how that turned out. The Millennials are not any smarter, as you will see in due course.

      A certain fraction of geezers think that the young will change the world order in a way that the geezers would like, but it never happens. Dream on

      1. Winston   11 years ago

        A certain fraction of geezers think that the young will change the world order in a way that the geezers would like, but it never happens. Dream on

        Sums up Gillespie.

  2. PapayaSF   11 years ago

    53 percent of Millennials still say they want "a bigger government that provides more services"

    That's the "individualism" of putting your own posters on the walls of your bedroom at Mom & Dad's house.

    1. Cytotoxic   11 years ago

      BAM.

    2. Swiss Servator, mehr Spr?ngli   11 years ago

      Yowch!

  3. The Immaculate Trouser   11 years ago

    Yeah, they are so individualistic that they favor more government than any other generation, less capitalism, work less than their forebears, and feel good about themselves for doing so. They are more complacent and less willing to challenge hierarchies. Most have spent their entire lives cocooned by a public school system extending into their mid-twenties, and have no notion or understanding of the world outside that context and indoctrination. If you want to pin your hopes on student revolt, then simply know that 1) such things generally don't work out well from a historical point of view, and 2) this generation in particular is not likely to mount a revolt of any kind, since they're just fine with current trends in government outside of some peripheral issues.

    1. BardMetal   11 years ago

      Wasn't there recent polls saying that Millennials care less about the enviroment then previous generations, and that they are less likely to support gun control then their parent's generation?

      I think these people might be a little more complicated then you're making them out to be.

      1. The Immaculate Trouser   11 years ago

        No, that is the generation before millennial IIRC. That said, I don't see how anyone could expect better of a generation indoctrinated in government schools for longer than any other generation before it.

        1. Cytotoxic   11 years ago

          No BM is right. On environmentalism and gun rights the Millenials are better than other gens. It's weird because so much of Gen Millen is as crappy as you say. Keep in mind Coochi got more Milli votes than McCauliffe.

      2. PM   11 years ago

        Those are single issues. On broader issues of the role of government, millennials aren't any different from boomers - they like it big.

        1. David Wall   11 years ago

          My millineal daughter an all her buds are simply agnostic about government's role. Their biggest issue is getting job in the field they studied in college and getting on with their life. I've also hire lots of these folks for entry level manufacturing jobs.

          I've not met one that wanted a government job or wanted on the government dole. Not one.

          Like Bard said above, its complicated. The jury is out.

          1. PM   11 years ago

            No group of people is ever a monolithic bloc. As a generality though, the plurality of every living generation in 2014, the youngest included, is in favor of a very strong central state far beyond the scope that any classical liberal or libertarian would support. That the kiddos like to smoke pot does not a libertarian moment make. On broad questions of the role of government, the very survey Gillespie cites makes it clear that millennials come down on the side of a more powerful, more centralized government.

            1. Virginian   11 years ago

              Indeed, and I'd like to expand on it by pointing out that every single person I've ever met is a libertarian when it comes to their own preferences, hobbies, interests, and lifestyle. No one ever thinks that the things they like need to be regulated or controlled or banned.

              Or as a better writer once said

              Must be a yearning deep in human heart to stop other people from doing as they please. Rules, laws ? always for other fellow. A murky part of us, something we had before we came down out of trees, and failed to shuck when we stood up. Because not one of those people said: Please pass this so that I won't be able to do something I know I should stop. Nyet, tovarishchee, was always something they hated to see neighbors doing. Stop them for their own good.

          2. Robert   11 years ago

            Are you still hiring? I need a job.

      3. Homple   11 years ago

        Polls? I'll wait right here for the revealed preferences to show up.

  4. TPaign   11 years ago

    Your Generation
    Written by Thomas Paign, 2012

    U People will try to keep us d-down (Talkin' 'bout your generation)
    While U work us into the ground (Talkin' 'bout your generation)
    To support a future that's already been s-s-sold (Talkin' 'bout your generation)
    I hope U die before U get old (Talkin' 'bout your generation)

    This is your generation
    This is your generation, Granny

    Why don't U all f-fade away (Talkin' 'bout your generation)
    U better listen to what we all s-s-say (Talkin' 'bout your generation)
    We are trying to cause a big s-s-sensation (Talkin' 'bout your generation)
    To defend our future from your g-g-g-generation (Talkin' 'bout your generation)

    This is your generation
    This is your generation, Granny

    Why don't you all f-fade away (Talkin' 'bout your generation)
    And don't try to s-steal our p-pay-day (Talkin' 'bout your generation)
    I am trying to cause a b-big s-s-sensation (Talkin' 'bout your generation)
    I'm takin' this message to the entire n-n-nation (Talkin' 'bout your generation)

    This is your generation
    This is your generation, Granny

    Pop your boner pills and p-play away (Talkin' 'bout your generation)
    Kick the can again our w-w-way (Talkin' 'bout your generation)
    We'll no longer do what we've been t-t-told (Talkin' 'bout your generation)
    Gotta steal our future back from the o-o-old (Talkin' 'bout your generation)

    This is your generation
    This is your generation, Granny

    1. C. S. P. Schofield   11 years ago

      Classic!

  5. setTHEline   11 years ago

    So by joining the army of selfie snapping millennials, I will be considered an icon of individualism? Because nothing says individual like doing the same thing as millions of other people. The movement away from political parties is less of a movement towards individualism, and more of a movement towards apathy about important things.

    1. BardMetal   11 years ago

      You would be a special little snowflake, just like everyone else.

      1. Gorilla tactics   11 years ago

        Hey that's the motto on my participation trophy.

    2. Brandon Magoon   11 years ago

      Rejecting the Republicrats is apathy?

  6. Stormy Dragon   11 years ago

    The Boomers are deathly worried that the Millennials' self-focus will start moving our society's center of attention away from THEIR self-focus.

    1. Gorilla tactics   11 years ago

      it's self absorbed solipsisms all the way down

      1. C. S. P. Schofield   11 years ago

        Bing!

  7. Grand Moff Serious Man   11 years ago

    Given that, the real question isn't why most Millennials are turning their backs on institutions, it's why any of them are still clinging to the old ways? The Pew study documents instances of what I would charitably call the confusion of youth (despite huge and ongoing disappointment with Obama, the Affordable Care Act, and political parties, 53 percent of Millennials still say they want "a bigger government that provides more services").

    Because obviously welfare statism would be so much better if they were the ones running it.

    Most people involved in politics at any age don't want to destroy Sauron's Ring; they think they can wield it and reshape the world in their image.

  8. Gorilla tactics   11 years ago

    I think the problem is that these people are basically the children of boomers and early generation Xers, the boomers were suckers for practically every bullshit neurotic parenting trend in the past 35-40 years or so and they imparted that madness, like the self esteem movement, onto their children and we are stuck with them today. That, combined with an educational system that has horribly prepared them for work in the real world, has more or less resulted in reality hitting them like a ton of bricks. That being said though, I think we are past "peak milllenial" because of Obama's crash and burn of an administration. He was their guy and I wouldn't be surprised if we could peel off a few libertarians off of them.

    1. Virginian   11 years ago

      I'd argue it's more about the horrific regulatory structure then anything else. I'm 25, and I'm pretty smart. I have a business idea, and was utterly stymied by the paperwork, and this is in Virginia, which is usually in the top five or so states for regulation.

      I don't have the ability to quite either of my jobs to work more hours on this side gig, which I hope will turn into a main earner. So I'm basically forced to either steal time from my other employers, or run the whole thing under the table and risk all that entails.

      The regulation is strangling the economy.

      1. The Immaculate Trouser   11 years ago

        I'm 25, and I'm pretty smart. I have a business idea, and was utterly stymied by the paperwork, and this is in Virginia, which is usually in the top five or so states for regulation.

        I don't have the ability to quite either of my jobs to work more hours on this side gig, which I hope will turn into a main earner. So I'm basically forced to either steal time from my other employers, or run the whole thing under the table and risk all that entails.

        I see this a lot with entrepreneurial types in their twenties. Another thing I notice is how life and business decisions are postponed 'for school' to the point where all of these decisions (and the timescale to make mistakes when you're young) is basically nil. Higher ED and regulation are killing our natural talents before they even try.

        1. Virginian   11 years ago

          Well I dropped out of school after one year, because I realized I was accruing a fuckload of debt if I kept going. I burned through my parent provided college fund in one and a half semesters. Took out a loan for the rest. Then was like...fuck that's dumb.

          I have over 50 grand that my grandparents saved for me. Haven't touched it. When I have a smart plan for it, I'll ask for the keys.

          1. The Immaculate Trouser   11 years ago

            That was definitely the way to go, if you want to own your own business. There is ~zero point in getting non-occupational training lasting longer than three months if your goal is to be your own boss.

            1. Virginian   11 years ago

              I wish I could own my own business. Even in the best states, it seems like you're more like a straw boss for the bureaucrats.

              Hell, just trying to figure out what the best kind of business to set up is tricky.

              1. The Immaculate Trouser   11 years ago

                Yeah, it's a shitshow out there. Good luck.

              2. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

                Hell, just trying to figure out what the best kind of business to set up is tricky.

                Might I suggest providing something people want to buy?

                1. Virginian   11 years ago

                  Might I suggest providing something people want to buy?

                  Nah, I think I got that part. I'm talking about which forms to fill out. Drives me nuts.

                  1. PM   11 years ago

                    That's one of the areas where a little coursework is very helpful. But a financial adviser could point you in the right direction for the cost of a 1 hour consult, and you can offload the actual business formation to any number of services, including LegalZoom. They make it stupid easy.

                    1. Virginian   11 years ago

                      Yeah I've heard of them....on the radio...so are they legit? Because I dismiss most radio ads as a scam to be honest.

                    2. PM   11 years ago

                      If you're just forming a basic business structure, up to and including a s-corp or uncomplicated c-corp, they're great. If you're thinking of founding the next Facebook and Y Combinator is knocking on your door, you'd probably better consult a decent corporate attorney.

            2. PM   11 years ago

              There is ~zero point in getting non-occupational training lasting longer than three months if your goal is to be your own boss.

              Having obtained a business management degree that I may as well have wiped my ass with in anticipation of owning my own business, I can confirm this 100% (graduating in 2009 didn't do me any favors either, but the point still stands). A year's worth of community college courses and some free library books will get you all the basic knowledge you need to start and operate a business. However, unless you're going to be getting into the trades, it's not a terrible idea to have a credential to fall back on in case you fail, because you won't even get any interviews otherwise.

      2. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

        The regulation is strangling the economy.

        THIS, THIS, 1000 times THIS.

        Fixing economies is easy. You simply need to make it easy for business to do business. Unfortunately, 50% of the population has no idea what I'm talking about.

        1. PM   11 years ago

          Even many of the European social democracies have figured out you don't kill the golden goose. America's take on Italian fascism is the worst of all worlds.

        2. Gorilla tactics   11 years ago

          Yeah but the problem though is that the progtards are "creationists" economically. like a creationist, only an all knowing super intelligence can create wealth, through a highly centralized process. The idea that wealth is the product of a decentralized, disruptive process simply cannot fit into their mental architecture. Remember chief Lies with tenure Elisabeth Warren? "the roads we all paid for" It didn't occur to anyone in that room to ask her where did "we" get the money to spend on TEH ROADZ in the first place? They believe that wealth is the normality, meaning that it's absence necessitates an explanation and that poverty is abnormality when in reality it is the diametric opposite.

  9. Grand Moff Serious Man   11 years ago

    But hey, at least we got this Millenial on the side of liberty

    1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

      Ummm, dude this video is totally a fake. I've been informed that people that are aged similarly to this woman don't believe these things. Ever.

      So this video is either of a really well-preserved WWII vet, or CGI trickery.

      1. Virginian   11 years ago

        I have never understood the youth cult shit. Maybe it's due to being a conservative for my teenage years, but I never understood how so many of my peers managed to internalize that old stuff was automatically bad.

        If the 2nd is outdated, so are all the others. They're the same age.

        1. EDG reppin' LBC   11 years ago

          Watch the video.

      2. The Immaculate Trouser   11 years ago

        Part of a pre-New Deal cloning project to preserve Real America from FDR and Truman, actually.

    2. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

      Hey it's my new love.

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

        If only she went to Duke.

  10. Mike M.   11 years ago

    Millennials in 2014?still slogging through an anemic recovery to an awful recession?are as optimistic about their future as Gen Xers were in 1994. That was a time when the U.S. economy was revving up, the Internet was becoming a mass medium, and the post-Cold War world has seemingly slipped the noose of history. Eighty-five percent of Millennials say they either already earn enough or will earn enough "to lead the kind of life they want," compared to 68 percent of Gen Xers and 60 percent of Boomers.

    It seems to me like most Millennials don't "earn" anything at all, as most of them are more or less unemployable and still living in their parents' homes.

    I bet they wouldn't be so unjustifiably optimistic and proud of themselves if their parents decided to kick their lazy, worthless asses out of the house.

    1. PM   11 years ago

      I'd be fairly surprised if your estimate is correct even for a 50%+1 definition of "most". Gen Y is probably the most statist in history, but that doesn't mean it conforms to whatever lazy stereotype you read in a hysterically panicked op-ed.

      Unemployed != unemployable.

    2. Gorilla tactics   11 years ago

      "recovery"

      lol

  11. Kevin47   11 years ago

    Who is complaining about their individualism? It is their collectivism, and demands that government provide for their every whim and want, that has me concerned.

    Sure, all of this comes under the auspices of individualism. We need to forgive their college loans, we are told, so they are free to study whatever topic they want and share their individual wisdom with the rest of us (by forcing on us). Insofar as they are rejecting both parties, it is not in the name of liberty, but the embrace of "third way" politics that is always looking for more ways to get government involved in everything we do.

  12. PM   11 years ago

    Narcissism != individualism

    And Gillespie's own source blows his claims out of the water, as was already pointed out. The book's been out since 2011. At some point, can't you just admit you might have been wrong about the pending gen y "libertarian moment"?

  13. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

    Eighty-five percent of Millennials say they either already earn enough or will earn enough "to lead the kind of life they want," compared to 68 percent of Gen Xers and 60 percent of Boomers.

    Wow, this is a stunning counter factual to many conservative myths.

    Great essay, Nick.

    1. Kevin47   11 years ago

      Not really. They clearly believe governmental provisions are part and parcel of attaining the lifestyle they want. Else, why would an unemployed or underemployed 20-something share such a confidence?

      1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

        So Millennials are all unemployed layabouts?

        I expected something stupid like that from Mike M above but not from others here.

        That is a sign of the deficiency of the conservative mind - Hasty Generalization.

        ALL LIBERALS ARE ON WELFARE!

        1. PM   11 years ago

          So Millennials are all unemployed layabouts?

          Man, you sure killed the FUCK out of that strawman.

          They are, on the other hand, poorer and vastly more underemployed than previous generations were at their age, and apparently are satisfied with that.

          1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

            They clearly believe governmental provisions are part and parcel of attaining the lifestyle they want. Else, why would an unemployed or underemployed 20-something share such a confidence?

            This idiot said exactly that.

            1. PM   11 years ago

              This idiot said exactly that.

              No, he said exactly this:

              Not really. They clearly believe governmental provisions are part and parcel of attaining the lifestyle they want. Else, why would an unemployed or underemployed 20-something share such a confidence?

              The portion you extracted wasn't in the text. Suggesting that reliance on government might partially explain why poor people with no jobs are more satisfied with their lives than their relatively wealthier peers != So Millennials are all unemployed layabouts?

            2. Kevin47   11 years ago

              If 85% of respondents said they make enough, or are confident they will make enough, it is certain that unemployed and underemployed people are expressing that confidence.

          2. Virginian   11 years ago

            The problem many of my age people have is that they still haven't realized the bright and shining lie. They brownnosed, got into good colleges, studied hard, took on truly staggering levels of debt.....and all that was a lie.

            They really really want their loans paid off by the government. That will be the next big justice push, watch.

            1. Ayn Random Variation   11 years ago

              It's one of the things the Dems will use to buy more votes.

            2. Corning   11 years ago

              That will be the next big justice push, watch.

              Pretty sure Occupy Wall Street was that push.

              Well the white kid version of that push anyway.

              Boy those OWS people really really were so very blindingly white.

              You guys noticed how friggin white they were?

              Like some Nazi Austrian Octoberfest kind of white.

              I don't think down town New York has been that white since the dutch ran the place.

              1. Corning   11 years ago

                Hell the cops were more diverse then OWS.

                It was like watching Caesar's Legionaries who were conscripted from all over the Roman empire cut through the grubby white hordes of Ambiorix's army.

                1. Virginian   11 years ago

                  Yeah a huge part of their platform, such as it was, was "student loan debt relief".

                  It's bailout nation man, we just live in it.

    2. PM   11 years ago

      Thank God for lowered expectations, eh shreeek?

    3. Homple   11 years ago

      As I said elsewhere, I'll wait for the revealed preferences before believing any poll.

  14. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

    Yay, generation bashing!

    Gawd, if ever there's been a more useless exercise in idiocy, I haven't seen it.

    1. Episiarch   11 years ago

      Well, we could engage in REGION WAR or KULTUR WAR. Those are pretty fucking retarded too. Isn't collectivism fun?

      1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

        You individualists are all the same!

        Get a job, asshole.

        1. Episiarch   11 years ago

          My job right now is to go get a pastrami Reuben and some beer since I finished my squats. Luckily the friends who will be joining me are already drunk, having been drinking for a while at the Odin brewery in Fremont. Fucking lushes. Oh how I envy them.

          1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

            Can't you squat and drink beer at the same time? Just decrease the weight by 10%. (or increase it if you are that kind of drunk).

          2. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

            Man, pastrami is the shit.

            I found a deli that makes their own and can't wait to get over there to try it.

            They have a corned beef and pastrami on toasted rye with swiss and hot mustard.

          3. Robert   11 years ago

            You're living in a squat?

          4. Riven   11 years ago

            You just described my Saturday. Weird.

  15. Corning   11 years ago

    But they are not individuals.

    Try telling an Obama joke to millennials and you will get lectured too about Bush.

    In the 90s everyone would make fun of Clinton especially progressives.

    And Clinton was actually popular unlike Obama.

    1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

      Hey Virginian, what would you do if I told you an Obama joke?

    2. Virginian   11 years ago

      If you tell an Obama joke to this millenial I'll respond with a tirade of invective and fury.

      But don't let me trample your lawn.

      1. PM   11 years ago

        It depends a lot on the audience. You can usually tell when you meet a person, regardless of what generation they're from, whether they're going to be A) humorless and B) partisan knob gobblers. That said, most millennials are statist asswipes. Which isn't all that surprising when you take into account they were raised by 3 prior generations of statist asswipes. You don't have to be a Team player to be a statist.

        And before anybody drops a "get off my lawn" on me, I'm entitled (drink!) to make that judgment about millennials - I've got a birth date in 1986.

        1. Corning   11 years ago

          I'm entitled (drink!) to make that judgment about millennials - I've got a birth date in 1986.

          So does that mean I have to be black to criticize Obama over stimulus policy?

          1. PM   11 years ago

            Obviously no, but it does make make the people who would default to a counter-argument of "RACIST!" look kind of silly.

          2. Ayn Random Variation   11 years ago

            "So does that mean I have to be black to criticize Obama over stimulus policy?"

            That would make you an Uncle Tom.

        2. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

          That said, most millennials Americans are statist asswipes.

          Fixed that, because if it were any other way we wouldn't have the monstrous behemoth that is us.gov.

          1. PM   11 years ago

            I quite agree, which I thought would be clear from the sentence following that one.

            1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

              I don' have time to read entire comments before responding.

              Gawd, what do you think I am, some sort of social security collecting boomer with the time to parse every word said by every person everywhere?

              Here's a hint: Get a job hippy.

              1. The Immaculate Trouser   11 years ago

                Damn kids. When I was your age in 1983, I would troll on the internet uphill through the snow both ways.

                1. PM   11 years ago

                  On a 14.4 baud modem too

    3. Sy   11 years ago

      "Try telling an Obama joke to millennials and you will get lectured too about Bush."

      I just mock them with "B-B-B-B B-B--B-B-B BU-B-B-BUT--BOOOOOOSH D-D-D-D-D-DID IT" Then ask them if stammering like an idiot worked on their parents.

  16. mr lizard   11 years ago

    I figure I should inform all you stooooopid meat sacks that your future reptilian overlords actually favor Gen X types... The flannel trends of the 90's amuses them.

    1. Corning   11 years ago

      I await URKOBOLD's take on all this.

      He is better at knowing the minds of the reptilian overlord demographic then they know themselves.

  17. C. S. P. Schofield   11 years ago

    So the increasingly arthritic, and always idiotic, Baby Boom is throwing its typical tantrum that the rising generations decline to acknowledge their wonderfulness.

    I belong to the Boom, and they have always made me tired.

  18. Corning   11 years ago

    Millennials are turning their backs on institutions

    53 percent of Millennials still say they want "a bigger government that provides more services"

    Eighty-five percent of Millennials say they either already earn enough or will earn enough "to lead the kind of life they want," compared to 68 percent of Gen Xers and 60 percent of Boomers.

    Cynically optimistic about expanding the institution they hate!!!

    Jesus this makes them sound just like GenX.

  19. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago


    George Bush Lost an Entire Generation for the Republican Party

    ?By Kevin Drum
    | Fri Mar. 7, 2014 12:45 PM GMT

    Pew has released a new survey about the social and political attitudes of various generations, and it makes for interesting reading. The thing that strikes me the most is just how clear the trends are.

    Bush was that bad. The stench will last decades. War, Bible Beating and Big Gov are a bad combo.

    http://www.motherjones.com/kev.....ican-party

    1. Sy   11 years ago

      Eh..

    2. Sy   11 years ago

      "B-B-B-B-B-B-UUSH D-D-D-D-D-DID IT"

    3. Corning   11 years ago

      Shrike has his finger on the pulse of generation 2000.

      BOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHH!!!!!

    4. PM   11 years ago

      And the Republicans used to own the youth demographic too. Goddamn BOOOOOOOOOSH.

      1. Robert   11 years ago

        "Bouche? He wasn't even running!" ? Gary Shandling

  20. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Bush was that bad.

    No way!

    Booooooosh was totally awesome. That's why we all love him.

    1. Palin's Buttplug   11 years ago

      Bush = GOP.

      Obama/Clinton = Democrats.

      Easy win for the latter.

      1. XM   11 years ago

        The war in Iraq stopped being an issue years ago. The Democrat presidents got us into several wars and many of them were staunch defenders of segregation. People move on.

        Seriously, you think most 25 year old millennial can recall details from the Clinton or Bush presidency? Engage in any sort of substantive debate about NAFTA, deregulation of the banks (Clinton was involved in that) and the dot com burst?

        You must feel good that most millennials will vote democrats, but it doesn't change the fact that they will more or less continue the errors of their predecessors, including wars and failed experiments like ACA.

        1. Corning   11 years ago

          Seriously, you think most 25 year old millennial can recall details from the Clinton or Bush presidency? Engage in any sort of substantive debate about NAFTA, deregulation of the banks (Clinton was involved in that) and the dot com burst?

          This frustrates me to no end. Having to explain things to them.

          I knew about the fucking 70s and 80s and I didn't have wikipedia.

          Clinton was involved in that

          Also have to remind them that Clinton signed the defense of marriage act.

          1. Riven   11 years ago

            Consider the average 25 year old millennial was in the beginning year or two of grade school.

            I remember watching Clinton's impeachment on TV when I was in first grade. Anything else about his administration, I've learned in the years since. Point is, while they may not be able to recall some of those things, they're certainly capable of learning about it.

      2. Eggs Benedict Cumberbund   11 years ago

        Progs love power, its their holy grail. Without power to perfect man through the historical march to a perfect government we would just have chaos. That's why eugenics, fascism, etc are so cool to these guys.

        So guys like Clinton, who have the power (and use it) to have inconvenient associates whacked (Vince Foster), are beloved by the power loving hive.

  21. Stephdumas   11 years ago

    Speaking of Millennials, the website American Thinker mentionned that video about Millennials and Obama. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RhBVkkyoOg

    1. Corning   11 years ago

      You know nothing Julia Bass....you are still hot though.

  22. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    Obama/Clinton = Democrats.

    Which Clinton?

    Oh, wait, it doesn't matter, your tongue still has shit all over it.

    1. Corning   11 years ago

      I think he means the Clinton that after losing the house moved his politics rightward to within the width of a cunt hair of the Republicans.

      Interesting enough that Clinton is still beloved unlike the other Clinton, Bush or Obama.

  23. Damien   11 years ago

    Sorry but with a few exceptions, Millennials cannot endure deprivation for much more than an hour or two. They are overly dependent upon the corporate capitalistic structure, and I have not observed many who are able to make it independently. Even the Occupy movement folks devolved into jingoistic leftist claptrap.

    1. Virginian   11 years ago

      Even the Occupy movement folks devolved into jingoistic leftist claptrap.

      They didn't devolve there, they started there. The attempt of painting the OWS people as libertarian was retarded from the get go.

      They are overly dependent upon the corporate capitalistic structure, and I have not observed many who are able to make it independently.

      That applies, if it does apply, equally to their parents and grandparents.

      1. Winston   11 years ago

        Problem is there aren't many yute activists that really do challenge the ideas of their parents or grandparents except to demand more free shit or full communism or whatever. Not really all that rebellious or libertarian.

        1. Virginian   11 years ago

          But again, this is true of every fucking age group nowadays.

          It's a nation of moochers. Everybody wants a piece of the pie.

          1. Winston   11 years ago

            I know the irony of the boomers and yutes not really being all that different from the old folks. I recall there was a lot of ink spilled about Teh Yutes in the Jazz Age and are they really all that different from their descendants?

  24. Winston   11 years ago

    A full 51 percent of Millennials believe they won't receive any Social Security benefits and an additional 39 percent say that they will receive reduced benefits if they get anything at all

    Do they actually oppose Social Security or are they just mad they won't be getting enough free shit?

    1. Virginian   11 years ago

      Well given the choice of

      a. paying FICA and getting SSDI
      b. paying FICA and not getting SSDI
      c. not paying FICA and not getting SSDI

      I chose C over B and A, but if C isn't an option then I damn sure would rather have B than A.

      1. Corning   11 years ago

        "damn sure would rather have b. paying FICA and not getting SSDI than a. paying FICA and getting SSDI"

        huh?

        1. Virginian   11 years ago

          Damn it we need an edit button. Obviously my preference ranking is

          C, then A, and then B.

          1. Winston   11 years ago

            Well I understand getting pissed about being looted but my point is that choosing A is not a sign of some rebellious latent libertarianism.

            1. Virginian   11 years ago

              Well that's kind of the insidious nature of the welfare state, isn't it, and democracy in general.

              My attitude is, I didn't set it up, I didn't vote for it, but they're gonna slip my money away, I'll catch whatever coins they throw back.

              Hell of a world, isn't it?

              1. PM   11 years ago

                I'd agree to the compromise of continuing to pay FICA taxes while the current generation of beneficiaries receive benefits, but the system gets spun down for everyone else.

          2. PM   11 years ago

            Goddamn kids these days can't even tell A from B.

            1. Virginian   11 years ago

              A is A. I read it in a book.

  25. Winston   11 years ago

    Eighty-five percent of Millennials say they either already earn enough or will earn enough "to lead the kind of life they want," compared to 68 percent of Gen Xers and 60 percent of Boomers.

    So the yutes are more satisfied with the status quo then their elders? This will make them more likely to challenge the institutions and change the world how?

  26. Winston   11 years ago

    So isn't this post a bunch of the same old nonsense? Old fogeys complaining about Teh Yutes and an old fogey defending Teh Yutes by saying that they are going to create utopia by doing whatever said old fogey wants?

    1. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

      I think that this isn't anything different than before. We have another generation that loves big government, but not any more or less so than their parents.

      1. Winston   11 years ago

        We have another generation that loves big government, but not any more or less so than their parents.
        Or the Greatest Generation or the Jazz Generation and so on...

      2. Winston   11 years ago

        Or about how modern tech means the youth will create utopia like the Victorians or the Jazz Age or the Baby Boomers...

  27. Winston   11 years ago

    So why aren't the yutes rebelling against old ideas? Well what ideas can they rebel against? Tolerance, anti-racism, anti-bullying, the welfare state, the regulatory state, free university, self esteem, being "rebellious", etc.?

  28. Winston   11 years ago

    You Know Which Other Country had Youth cynical about the Government and of the mainstream political parties yet wanted more government?

    1. PM   11 years ago

      France?

    2. General Butt Naked   11 years ago

      America circa 1969?

  29. Byte Me   11 years ago

    Whoda thunk that growing up against the background of two inconclusive, ill-conceived, and poorly prosecuted wars might have soured Millennials on the old Red, White, and Blue?

    These neo-Confederate, separatist, anti-government anarchists must be silenced!

    /sarc

  30. Agile Cyborg   11 years ago

    The individualist track is all good and well but if millenials don't gravitate to studying the past then the future is not necessarily that robust for them. Sadly, this problem of knowing very little about history is a cancer that seems to infect a lot of people I run into- both online and offline.

    1. Eggs Benedict Cumberbund   11 years ago

      I agree. We can't really advance without institutions or as least loose social constructs that create the great networked intelligence through trade and other forms of exchange that keep us from starving, getting bored, or eaten by aliens.

  31. buybuydandavis   11 years ago

    "there will be only one 'ism'?Individualism?and its rule will never end. "

    YAY!

  32. Sade   11 years ago

    "Only pot, selfies and Facebook will abide." This made me laugh out loud harder than I have in months...these people are so out of touch it's a wonder they can even wipe their own ass.

  33. Virginian   11 years ago

    Mary, I like your new handle. It's a shame no one will be able to use it soon.

  34. Virginian   11 years ago

    Epi? What is Epi?

  35. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

    You can have all the attention you want here:
    http://reason.com/archives/201.....nt_4395693

  36. Corning   11 years ago

    Pretty sure being raised in a society with Internet will have measurable political/social trends vs people being raised in a society without Internet.

  37. PM   11 years ago

    It's Mary. Just point and laugh.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Freedom Lovers Can Reckon with Addicts and Addiction

Daniel Akst | 6.15.2025 7:00 AM

Ross Douthat on Digital Alienation, Birth Rates, and Demographic Collapse

Liz Wolfe and Zach Weissmueller | From the July 2025 issue

More Than 1,800 'No Kings' Protests Aim for Nonviolent Pushback Against Trump Policies

Nancy Rommelmann | 6.14.2025 10:10 AM

Have Presidents Grown Too Powerful To Be Removed From Office?

Gene Healy | 6.14.2025 8:00 AM

Some Federal Agencies Are Actually Getting More Efficient

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 6.14.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!