Here's yet another reason to support Reason during our annual webathon: We're out on the streets covering all sorts of events that matter.
Consider last Thursday, when the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) coordinated "wage strikes" in over 100 cities and called for a minimum wage of $15 an hour for fast-food workers. Reason TV covered the event held in New York City and filed a report that you didn't see on your evening news.
Take a look by clicking above and read the original writeup of our coverage by going below the fold.
If you appreciate this sort of thing, please consider giving us a tax-deductible donation. Details on all that here.
Yesterday, Naomi Brockwell and I attended a demonstration demanding that fast-food restaurants boost their minimum wage to $15 per hour, or a little more than double the current federal minimum wage. The strike, which was led by a group called Fast Food Forward that's affiliated with the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), was one of more than a 100 similar demonstrations held in cities across the country.
The New York demonstration had about 150 people, but the number of actual fast food employees participating in the strike was small. It was business as usual at every restaurant we dropped by yesterday morning and, at a McDonald's restaurant on 23rd Street and Madison Avenue in Manhattan, employees behind the counter said they had heard nothing about a strike.
We caught up with the protesters in front of a Wendy's in downtown Brooklyn, where the crowd consisted of union organizers, fast-food workers, and their sympathizers. An estimated one-third of the demonstrators were fast-food employees, meaning that less than one-tenth of 1 percent of New York City's 57,000 fast-food workforce participated in the strike.
The group was traveling from one fast-food restaurant to another, before winding up at Foley Square in Manhattan around 1pm.
Multiple strikers told us they had received compensation through a union strike fund to appear, but declined to say the amount they were paid.
Artificially doubling wages to $15 an hour would change many things in the fast food industry, including the easy path it provides for low-skilled employees to break into the labor market. Substantially higher wages would mean that existing employees would be less apt to look for other positions, and senior staffers would be more inclined to hog shift hours. Franchisees would likely move more aggressively to replace human service workers with automated cash registers, which is already happening in European McDonald's. Evidence of how artificially boosting wages destroys opportunities for entry level workers was best documented in a 2006 study by economists David Neumark and William Wascher, which was updated in 2013.
In interviews, several striking workers described how it had been relatively easy for them to get a job in fast-food service. Shenita Simon, who works as a shift supervisor at KFC, told us that she doesn't know where else she would have been able to find a position, because fast food is the only industry that "will allow you to have minimum education." Isaac Wallace, a Burger King employee, described how he was able to get his job immediately after moving to New York from Jamaica by simply walking into a Burger King in Brooklyn and approaching the manager.
Once the strike moved to Foley Square, organizers from Fast Food Forward began obstructing our efforts to talk with protesters.
For more on why doubling wages for fast food workers would hurt entry-level workers, read Nick Gillespie's "Big Labor's Big Mac Attack" at The Daily Beast.
Produced by Jim Epstein and hosted by Naomi Brockwell.
About 2.30 minutes.
Scroll down for downloadable versions and subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube Channelto receive automatic updates when new material goes live.
Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com
posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary
period.
Subscribe
here to preserve your ability to comment. Your
Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the
digital
edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do
not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments
do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and
ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
my best friend's mother-in-law makes $86 an hour on the laptop. She has been out of work for ten months but last month her paycheck was $15291 just working on the laptop for a few hours. look here,....
Well, I don't blame them for demonstrating for higher wages. If I were in their shoes, I'd probably also find it quite REASONable to engage in such demonstrations.
This thread smells slightly past it's sell-by date.
The possessive pronoun "its" has no apostrophe in it.
On behalf of the world, welcome to the internet.
my best friend's mother-in-law makes $86 an hour on the laptop. She has been out of work for ten months but last month her paycheck was $15291 just working on the laptop for a few hours. look here,....
??????????
http://JUMP85.COM
??????????
Heh, the white dude telling the blacks not to talk to the reporter is something to behold at a union backed protest.
WHAT DO WE WANT?
FRIES WITH THAT!
WHEN DO WE WANT IT?
NOW! Since they stopped serving breakfast at 10:30.
Good video, this Naomi Brockwell, who according to her website is a trained opera singer, is pretty good at this.
She seems incredibly talented, in addition to being pretty. I hope her libertarian views don't cause her problems regarding her Hollywood dreams
I would really appreciate it if the Pats would stop spotting their opponents the first half.
Naomi Brockwell has convinced me of all the things she was saying, and will ever say.
Can we jsut roll with it or what dude? Seriously.
http://www.PrivacyTru.tk
Well, I don't blame them for demonstrating for higher wages. If I were in their shoes, I'd probably also find it quite REASONable to engage in such demonstrations.
Nothing wrong with demonstrating. But you do understand what the term 'astroturf' means, right?
Love that redhead.