Rand Paul Asks FBI For More Information On Domestic Drone Surveillance, Internal Approval Process
FBI acknowledged using drones in eight cases since 2006, six criminal and two national security


FBI director Robert Mueller last month told a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing the the bureau has been using drones for domestic surveillance. Mueller, however, did not offer any specifics, promising instead that the usage was "very minimal." Nevertheless, he told the committee he would submit more information later.
An unclassified letter sent by the FBI in response to questions sent by Rand Paul reports the bureau has used drones since 2006, in a total of "eight criminal cases and two national security cases." The only specific case offered was that of the week-long hostage situation involving a six-year-old girl in Alabama earlier this year. The FBI also claimed the drones were not equipped with any kind of weapons nor were they conducting "bulk" surveillance.
While the FBI said it would seek a warrant to use a drone if it involved breaching a "reasonable expectation of privacy," it said it had not needed to seek a warrant in any of its drone use so far, relying instead on internal legal advice (a favorite approval process of the executive branch). In a follow-up letter sent by Paul today, the senator asks the FBI for specifics on how the bureau defines a "reasonable expectation of privacy" and any "guidance documents," like legal memos and field manuals, that would expand on what the FBI considers a reasonable expectation of privacy. You can read Paul's full letter here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Mueller, however, did not offer any specifics, promising instead that the usage was "very minimal.""
If I had a completely tasteless sense of humor, I'd make a joke about "Mueller added that he would 'only put the tip in.'"
So what's the version of the joke that takes the form of a quatrain made up of fake Asiana airline pilot names? I mean, challenge yourself a little here.
I've been corrupted enough by this site already. I'd rather make jokes about the Hungarian Prime Minister, Miklos Misohorny.
Or the Serbian Prime Minister, Slobodan Pen?ildi?.
What about the Turkish Prime Minister, you know, Respec Tieyoup Erdor?asm?
Course you can't forget about Najib Makitnasti.
But then he's a lame duck and the next dude is named Fuckuhard Se?orita or something like that.
uh, Anthony Weiner.
Yes!
Represented by his attorney, Mr. Richard Head, Esquire
And his partner Benjamin Dover.
US POlitics, best POlitics money can buy!
http://www.GotMy-Anon.tk
Is anybody giving drone bounties in BitCoins?
I never thought about it liek that. Wow.
http://www.Only-Anon.tk