Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

D.A. Suspends Grand Jury Investigations of Police Shootings in Albuquerque; No Shooting Ever Ruled Unjustified

Ed Krayewski | 5.25.2012 1:05 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The district attorney in Albuquerque will be suspending the practice of sending police shootings to grand juries to determine that they were justified, the Albuquerque Journal reports.

There were 24 cop shootings since 2010; 17 were fatal. While cop shootings will no longer be handled by a grand jury, there are nine cop shootings still pending with the D.A.'s  office, including one by a cop who listed his job description on Facebook as "human waste disposal."

The Journal on what the D.A. (who's up for re-election!) might do next:

"I think what we have done in the past has a lot of integrity, but times are changing," [Kari] Brandenburg [the District Attorney] said in an interview. "More transparency is always a good thing, and I am going to do what I said I would do and look for alternatives."

Brandenburg said a preferable alternative would be to take each police shooting case before a judge in a preliminary court hearing. But that option would require charging each officer with a crime, she said.

"Ethically, we just can't charge someone with a crime if we don't believe a crime has been committed," she said. "So if we were to try and go that route, we would have to have a rule change."

Other options include appointing a special prosecutor for each case, which Brandenburg dismisses as too expensive, or forming a "review board" composed of citizens, attorneys, judges and law enforcement officials.

Brandenburg's opponent in the upcoming Democratic primary race for the DA's Office, public defender Jennifer Romero, has joined critics in denouncing the practice.

Brandenburg, who is seeking a fourth four-year term, has said the special grand jury process provides a second set of unbiased eyes to look at the work prosecutors in her office have done to determine whether police shootings are justified.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reason-Rupe: Wisconsinites Favor Increasing Public Union Retirement Contributions to Address Budget Deficit

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

PoliticsNanny StateWar on DrugsCivil LibertiesPolicyNew MexicoPolice AbusePoliceCriminal Justice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (23)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. John   13 years ago

    Can I please pleas please some day become a special prosecutor for cops? I know I am not a perfect man and have done nothing to deserve such a wonderful profession. But I promise, I absolutely am a really good court room attorney. And it would always be a labor of love.

    1. Suthenboy   13 years ago

      You have my vote brother.

    2. tarran   13 years ago

      If you are going to be in front of a jury, forget it.

      My brother is a great litigator (world famous in Boston) and he has dragged juries up to puddles of misfeasance, pushed their noses in it, and swirled them around to have them still come back with verdicts that indicated they saw nothing wrong.

      In one case involving wrongful death at a construction site, he got the maintenance foreman to admit they knew the crane part that failed was defective and there was an emergency recall from the manufacturer instructing immediate replacement before they shipped it out to a construction site where the pin failed within a day and the falling beams smashed a guy into strawberry jam. Despite all the damning admissions, the jury found the crane owners utterly unliable.

      Then there was the doctor who mutilated a woman he was doing surgery on like a modern day Mengele who walked away with no sanctions...

      Of course, most of the juries he deals with are composed of people out of Suffolk County...

      1. tarran   13 years ago

        BTW, I'd be happy to support your run for the position anyway...

      2. Somalian Road Corporation   13 years ago

        OK, what's the full deal with this Mengele story?

  2. Hugh Akston   13 years ago

    "Ethically, we just can't charge someone with a crime if we don't believe a crime has been committed," she said. "So if we were to try and go that route, we would have to have a rule change."

    So wait, you can turn something from unethical to ethical just by changing the rules? The law is magical.

    1. robc   13 years ago

      Thats what ethics are, the rules for a situation/profession.

      Morals are something entirely different that I think you are confusing with ethics.

  3. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

    Well I sure hope their training program is benchmarked across America. That is a pretty good record there!

  4. John   13 years ago

    A grand jury is not a bad way to look at these cases. But the grand jury's decision is only as good as the information that is provided to it. So for the review to be proper, the DA has to be interested in getting an indictment.

    The problem is not the system. It is the DA.

    1. Isaac Bartram   13 years ago

      Actually, I think for the review to be proper, the DA has to be interested in getting the facts.

      One would hope that if an indictment were appropriate the facts would produce one.

  5. Almanian's Evil Twin   13 years ago

    we just can't charge someone with a crime if we don't believe a crime has been committed

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...

    *breathe*

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Fucking prosecutor is fucked. Story at 11.

  6. sarcasmic   13 years ago

    including one by a cop who listed his job description on Facebook as "human waste disposal."

    Judge, jury, and executioner.

    1. Broseph of Invention   13 years ago

      Very efficient. So you're saying he's also a governmental waste disposal? Medals are in order.

  7. JW   13 years ago

    "More transparency is always a good thing, and I am going to do what I said I would do and look for alternatives."

    IOW, we're looking for a new way to sweep this shit under the rug, piss on your leg and tell you it's raining.

  8. Tonio   13 years ago

    IANAL, but my understanding is that a Grand Jury, once impaneled, is a powerful and terrible entity. Of course most (grand) jurors don't know this, so most GJ's are easily led by the prosecutor, but sounds like Ms. Brandenburg is aware of this and fears having a libertarian or FIJA member.

    I heard of a case a few years back where one GJ figured this out and caused no end of grief for the prosecutor because they actually did their job as prescribed by law.

    Any of you JD's want to comment on this? Anyone? John?

    1. John   13 years ago

      Yes Tonio. Grand Juries can be fearsome. They have subpoena power. They can witnesses questions. They can tell the DA to go collect documents and witness. They can in most states act as a fact finding commission.

      Sadly most grand juries don't do that. And they basically act as a blank slate for the DA. The DA puts on whatever facts he wants and the Grand Jury decides whatever the DA tells them to.

      Usually this works against he defendant. In small communities they can be appalling. Literally the DA gets up and goes

      There was a burglary over at the Smith's house. Everyone knows Billy Bob is a thief. So let's just indict him and get it over with.

      I am not kidding. But it could go the other way where the DA doesn't present any evidence and conducts the whole thing as an effort to vindicate the defendant. Or, as you say, the Grand Jury can get out of control and actually try to do its job.

    2. Tonio   13 years ago

      Thanks, John.

  9. Rich   13 years ago

    "I think what we have done in the past has a lot of integrity, but times are changing. More transparency is always a good thing, and I am going to do what I said I would do and look for alternatives."

    Ms. Brandenburg should skip the D.A. stuff and run for President.

  10. Diomasach   13 years ago

    17 of 24? That's a pretty poor percentage.

    1. LarryA   13 years ago

      Depending on the study, 80 to 85 percent of the people shot with a handgun survive.

      A 9mm bullet won't actually throw you over a car and make you instantly dead, like in the movies.

      1. perlhaqr   13 years ago

        First World medicine is pretty good stuff.

  11. perlhaqr   13 years ago

    Easy solution to her dilemma: What would she do if I shot someone here in this fine city of Albuquerque, in a situation where I can reasonably be presumed to have been acting in self defence? That's what she should do with police shootings.

  12. clarkcountycriminalcops   13 years ago

    "There were 24 cop shootings since 2010; 17 were fatal."

    Here in Las Vegas we has 12 fatal shootings in 2011 alone. In the last 20 years cops have fired their weapons at our neighbors more than 380 times with more than 145 dead.

    Not a single officer has been prosecuted for an on-duty shooting and not a single officer has been fired in the last twenty years as a result of on OIS.

  13. sweeterjan   13 years ago

    Not a single officer has been http://www.lunettesporto.com/ prosecuted for an on-duty shooting and not a single officer has been fired in the last twenty years as a result of on OIS.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Milton Friedman Disproved Trump's Argument for Tariffs Decades Ago

Joe Lancaster | 6.5.2025 4:35 PM

If Viewers Love PBS So Much, Let Them Pay for It

Robby Soave | 6.5.2025 3:20 PM

Florida Woman Fined $165,000 for Trivial Code Violations Takes Her Case to the Florida Supreme Court

Autumn Billings | 6.5.2025 3:05 PM

Nathan Fielder's 737 Stunt Involved Elaborate Workaround of Ridiculous 1,500-Hour Rule

Christian Britschgi | 6.5.2025 2:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!