Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Food Trucks Go Mainstream, But Will They Make the Grade?

Katherine Mangu-Ward | 10.12.2010 12:28 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Food trucks need customers. For many of L.A.'s newer entrants in the meals on wheels scene, this means building up Twitter followers—via prominently posted Twitter addresses on the sides of the trucks and other forms of advertising—and then pinging diners about their whereabouts regularly. While some trucks have regular routes, others prefer to cover new territory every day. Some of those trucks stay on the move, not because they crave a change of scenery or because they want to bring the gospel of kimchi tacos to a new neighborhood, but because they are forced to keep changing spots by hostile local restaurants or overzealous neighborhood cops.

Today, The New York Times covers the new regulatory regime about to fall on the heads of Los Angeles food truck owners, which includes health inspections identical to those undergone by restaurants, complete with letter grades, and mandatory filing of route maps:

Food trucks…will have to file route maps (route maps!) with the health department, to facilitate at least one field inspection a year, beyond the single annual inspection now required.

As with restaurants, health inspectors will be empowered to shut down a truck that scores less than a C for not enough attention to basic safety and food hygiene practices — for example, dirty counters, food left out, unwashed hands.

Because how could health inspectors possibly find trucks that broadcast their locations every day without a route map on file in a city basement somewhere?

While the food trucks previously joined together to fight new rules that would have limited where they could park and do business, they are mostly accepting the health inspection regime. Some have even found a way to see the bright side:

"It brings more legitimacy to an industry that is fairly new in the mainstream," said Matt Geller, vice president of the Southern California Mobile Food Vendors Association, which represents 86 food trucks.

But government veteran Gloria Molina, a member of the Board of Supervisors, knows better:

"Everyone is going to support it — until they get a B or a C," said Ms. Molina, who has previously battled with food truck owners over attempts to regulate them. "And then they are going to be opposed to it."

Here at Reason, we've written a lot about the ways that vested interests—community and local business associations, restaurants with multiple locations, and other longtimers—have shaped the system for their own benefit.

Be on the lookout for a followup story soon, in which hundreds of food trucks receive failing letter grades because of their inability to comply with rules written for bricks-and-mortar food establishments. Rules the health department will be unwilling to tweak to accommodate an new business model, probably on the tried-and-true justification that "if we make an exception for you, we'll have to make an exception for everyone."

Reason.tv took on the L.A. truck crackdown earlier this year:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The E-Word

Katherine Mangu-Ward is editor in chief of Reason.

PolicyNanny StateRegulationFood TrucksFood Freedom
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (35)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Old Mexican   15 years ago

    "It brings more legitimacy to an industry that is fairly new in the mainstream," said Matt Geller, vice president of the Southern California Mobile Food Vendors Association, which represents 86 food trucks.

    "It also rises the cost of entry for upstarting competitors, which is the real reason behind the regulations and not this phony concern about people's health."

    1. sloopyinca   15 years ago

      ding...ding...ding. We have a winner.

      It would be refreshing if he just said they wanted to limit entry into the market so they could remain profitable. My guess is the LA Supes would have bought that as well.

      1. Old Mexican   15 years ago

        It is a sad state of affairs when being "refreshing" is just telling the truth . . .

  2. fresnodan   15 years ago

    "kimchi tacos"
    That reminds me of a Korean/Mexican girl I knewin Fresno...and I was gonna say someting, but I better not...

    1. sloopyinca   15 years ago

      please..................................continue..........

    2. Old Mexican   15 years ago

      I like Fresno . . . it is so "in the middle of nowhere, near nowhere important."

      1. Ernie the Bear   15 years ago

        "They went to Fresno, esse." I can never hear the word, without thinking of that line. I think they should officially change the name to "They Went To Fresno, Esse." That would be awesome.

        Not quite as awesome as "Newcular Titties", but close.

  3. John   15 years ago

    Who do you trust, the LA government or these two?

    http://nomnomtruck.com/photos/.....07223.html

    Fuck you LA. Leave those chicks alone.

    1. Old Mexican   15 years ago

      I love the name: "Nom nom."

      1. John   15 years ago

        The were on the Food Network doing some kind of food truck contest. They almost won. My wife watched it. Then I started watching it because I thought the two Amerasian chicks in the Nom Nom truck were so hot. That kind of ruined it for my wife and she stopped watching it.

        1. Montani Semper Liberi   15 years ago

          The guy on that team was annoying. I loved the look on his face when he realized that the metal head hamburger guys won.

          1. John   15 years ago

            He was annoying. I could never figure out what he did for them. The one girl did the cooking. The other girl was just unbelievably hot and would go out and round up business. But what did he do? I guess the women hired him because they figured three women would get catty and a straight guy would spend all of his time trying to bang them.

  4. R C Dean   15 years ago

    the tried-and-true justification that "if we make an exception for you, we'll have to make an exception for everyone."

    Which you would think might prompt a little self-reflection on whether the regime itself is fundamentally flawed.

    But no.

    1. sloopyinca   15 years ago

      And by "an exception for everyone," they mean free entry into the marketplace. And God knows they can't let that happen.

      [rolls eyes]

    2. Night Elf Mohawk   15 years ago

      If only the same standard were applied to Obamacare. Seeing it in all its "glory" with no exceptions probably wouldn't work well for it.

      1. wylie   15 years ago

        But that's vitally important healthcare. Here, we're only talkin bout food, and it's not like people need that to survive.

  5. Ernie the Bear   15 years ago

    Based on the recommendation of a cow-orker, I've been wanting to try poutine, the primary ingredient of which is, apparently, steaming hot awesomeness, but I haven't. The only place in town that has it is a mobile food cart. I have no concerns about their food safety. The reason I haven't tried it is, the retards who run this town have turned our downtown into a parking nightmare, and I can only force myself to go there a couple times a year. Assholes. If it's half as good as I've heard, and they had a truck that could set up somewhere besides downtown, I would stalk them on the Interwebs.

    1. Robert   15 years ago

      Poutines may be the only worthwhile things ever to come from Quebec.

    2. Old Mexican   15 years ago

      You haven't lived until you tried cachete barbacoa tacos (slo-steamed beef cheek tacos), sprinkled with chopped onions, cilantro and green tomatillo&jalapeno; salsa.

      1. wylie   15 years ago

        No warning to put up the drool shield? Thanks a lot OM.

  6. P Brooks   15 years ago

    hundreds of food trucks receive failing letter grades because of their inability comply with rules written for bricks-and-mortar food establishments.

    By the time you get enough water (and a water heater) and a dishwasher on the truck to comply with regulations, there's no room for the food.

    1. wylie   15 years ago

      How else are you supposed to wash the papertowles and disposable cups/plates you serve your food on, huh, smart guy?!

  7. cynical   15 years ago

    It's kind of funny -- food trucks would seem to be the sort of business that could most easily give LA the bird and pack up and leave. We're starting to get more in cowtown, and I'd welcome any expatriate entrepreneurs from LA.

  8. Sean W. Malone   15 years ago

    Funny story... I was coming out of a movie at the Chinese walking up Hollywood Blvd. towards Highland about a year ago... And we walked by a little illegal Bacon-Wrapped Hot Dog cart. This wasn't a "truck", mind you, but basically a woman with a tiny roller cart and a heating element with an aluminum pan full of cooking bacon & dogs.

    It was amazing... And it sparked a conversation about food-safety.

    One of my friends did the greatest thing ever right at that moment. As we're walking up to the stand, he starts asking me how - in the absence of government regulations - anyone would know whether or not the food was safe to eat, and then when it was our turn to "order", he saw the woman picking a dog with slightly less-cooked bacon, and asked her for another one which was clearly cooked better.

    I laughed.

    1. Hazel Meade   15 years ago

      My answer is that we'd probably have unofficial voluntary food standards like the Kosher foods ones.

      Basically, if you're a food producer, you buy a membership, have the group inspect you, and if you pass, you are entitled to put a copyrighted symbol on your packaging, paying a small royalty fee to the organization.

      Then, grocery stores deciding what to stock can look for foods that have passed inspection by one or more recognized food safety groups, and will tend not to stock those that have not. Also 100% voluntary market mechanisms at work.

      Small food producers can still get by with roadside stalls and farmers markets, or specialty markets that are willing to stock uncertified foodstuffs. When they make enough money, they can pay the fee and get inspected.

      Customers can look for the stamps and decide for themselves if they want to take the risk.

      And the voluntary organizations who are providing the food inspection service (paid for by the food producers, not taxpayers, to boot!) will have an incentive to make sure that their inspections are good, so they don't lose their reputation and the credibility of their stamp or symbol, they lose their income.

      1. wylie   15 years ago

        Disagree with the "royalty fee" part. The cost of membership should be based on your inspection needs. Larger kitchens (hotels?) or business with multiple locations/trucks would take more resources to inspect. The volume of food served seems irrelevant to the inspection process, so paying royalties on each sale seems inappropriate to me.

        Other than that, "yeah, what Hazel said!"

        1. Sean W. Malone   15 years ago

          Stuff like the optimal payment method isn't ever worth arguing about in hypotheticals, is it?

          The whole point of a free market is that multiple options emerge and compete until an preferred arrangement is found - and sometimes that preferred arrangement is a plurality of simultaneous options, available to suit different individual needs. Royalty fee for some, per-inspection basis for others, one-time flat rate for others... who knows?

          1. Hazel Meade   15 years ago

            Yeah, I'm thinking packaged goods would pay a royalty fee for having the trademark symbol on their packaging.

            While restaurants would probably pay per inspection and have a certificate posted on the wall.

            It's very important that this NOT be a monopoly government service however, because the thing that makes it work is consumer trust and selection. If there's only one game in town, consumers can't patronize businesses that use a different (more trusted) food certification company, and the whole thing breaks down.

            Like "privatizing" the FDA would probably result in the FDA and industry just getting into bed with eachother. You have to have an alternative to the FDA to keep the FDA honest.

  9. Hazel Meade   15 years ago

    "Everyone is going to support it ? until they get a B or a C," said Ms. Molina, who has previously battled with food truck owners over attempts to regulate them. "And then they are going to be opposed to it."

    Because they are going to be grading on a curve?

    How much do you want to bet that city health inspector do that, just to justify their existance. If they don't fail X percent of businesses every year people might wonder why they have a job.

    1. Old Mexican   15 years ago

      +1

      I have argued this very point with people that don't want to believe that inspectors have a GREAT INCENTIVE to find a fault in a business even if not a single one exists because, otherwise, their supervisors will not believe them.

  10. Mike Laursen   15 years ago

    I'm just bummed that L.A. has all these great food trucks and we don't have any around here. I wonder why not.

  11. Colonel_Angus   15 years ago

    Can a truck's route map just be a map of the city?

    1. wylie   15 years ago

      You still have to trace over all the roads with a sharpie/highlighter.

      1. Sean W. Malone   15 years ago

        That would be awesome!

        I'd love to turn in a completely blackened map of Los Angeles or New York and outer Borroughs.

        That would be the best.

  12. IceTrey   15 years ago

    How many decades have the taco trucks been operating in LA? Hell, they were even called "roach coaches". Now that they are serving good food and have become popular here comes the gubmint.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Judge Orders Tufts Grad Student Rumeysa Ozturk Be Released on Bail From Immigration Detention

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.9.2025 3:17 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!