The Supreme Court's Next Big Fourth Amendment Case
How the digital privacy rights of millions are at stake in Chatrie v. United States.
How the digital privacy rights of millions are at stake in Chatrie v. United States.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiles v. Salazar.
There is no voting crisis that demands federal intervention.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara.
Understanding the stakes in Trump v. Barbara.
A war by any other name must still be authorized by Congress.
Two different pieces of legislation aim to create state workarounds to the procedural quagmire of federal civil rights litigation.
What’s at stake in Watson v. Republican National Committee.
“Officers don’t have the blanket authority to arrest anyone who runs from them,” says an attorney from the Institute for Justice.
Ohio sheriff's deputies raided Afroman's house in 2022 based on a bogus tip, then sued the rapper after he released music videos mocking the deputies.
Plus: Brian Doherty, RIP.
What happens if both political parties come to distrust the Court’s judgment?
The judiciary is largely absent from the long-running constitutional debate over undeclared foreign wars.
Plus: An unsettling comparison between the Iran War and “Lyndon Johnson going into Vietnam.”
The president has no lawful authority to launch a war absent a congressional declaration of war.
More habeas corpus petitions were filed over the last year than in the past three administrations combined because of the administration's mass detention policy.
The conservative justice’s regrettable opinion in Learning Resources v. Trump.
What explains the fracture in the Supreme Court's "conservative bloc"?
A federal judge ruled in 2022 that "no legitimate humane system would operate" like Arizona's prison health care system. Three years later, that same judge found the problems still hadn't been fixed.
The battle against the president's so-called reciprocal tariffs is won, but the war for free trade and a stable business environment continues.
Is the conservative Supreme Court justice planning to retire this year?
News outlets, civil rights groups, and court records tell a much different story than the government's claims about "Operation Catch of the Day."
The president was offended by a video reminding military personnel of their duty to disobey unlawful orders.
Three Republicans defected to vote down an arcane procedural rule that would have made it impossible for the House to vote on Trump’s tariffs until August.
Plus: Is this the Supreme Court’s next big immigration case?
Lower courts keep inventing loopholes to uphold discriminatory booze regulations.
Here's a quick reminder of what the Fourth Amendment has to say about that.
Sandy Martinez's little-known story is a microcosm of the broader debate over what, exactly, transgresses the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines.
Plus: More evidence that immigrants are good for America, Trump's call to "nationalize" elections, and more...
Plus: Why is the Supreme Court’s tariff decision taking so long?
It is nearly impossible to sue a rights-violating federal agent under current caselaw.
FIRE condemned the police visit: "This blatant overreach is offensive to the First Amendment."
Plus: Still waiting on the tariffs case.
Every federal circuit court that has considered the issue, including the one covering Florida, has upheld a First Amendment right to monitor and record the police.
Ten Frenchmen were given fines, jail time, and social media bans for accusing their first lady of being a pedophilic gay man.
The Supreme Court’s January docket is packed with big cases.
Frederick Bardell died from treatable colon cancer after waiting six months for a colonoscopy.
The chief justice hails the judiciary as “a counter-majoritarian check on the political branches.”
Puzzling over a curious omission from the conservative justice.
The right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure had a rocky 2025.
Remembering an important voice from the founding era.
Seven federal circuit courts have upheld the First Amendment right to record and monitor the police.
A conservative federal judge questions the reach of free speech.
From birthright citizenship to tariffs, many of the president’s key policies run counter to the Constitution’s original meaning.
The Supreme Court should take a page from its own history.
The document remains remarkably resilient, even as Republicans and Democrats keep launching assaults on liberty.
A year ago the Justice Department suspended the DEA's airport interdiction program because of significant legal risks. The DHS is still using the same tactics.
The Supreme Court’s power to nullify legislative and executive acts is inherent in the Constitution.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks