Jacob Sullum | July 2, 2007
Last week Chris Pagan, a resident of Glendale, Ohio, succeeded in his seemingly quixotic quest to overturn a city ordinance that threatened him with fines and jail time for putting a "For Sale" sign in the window of a car parked on the street in front of his house. The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled (PDF) that the sign ban, which does not apply to equally obtrusive noncommercial speech, violates the First Amendment. Overturning a ruling by a three-judge panel of the same court, the 6th Circuit concluded that the city had failed to show that its restrictions were narrowly drawn to directly and materially advance a legitimate regulatory interest. "The whim of government bureaucrats is not enough to justify censorship," said Jeff Rowes, an Institute for Justice attorney who represented Pagan. "This decision puts the burden back on government to justify restrictions on free speech, rather than making people like Chris prove they deserve constitutional protection for their rights."
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I thought I heard something about some terrorist acts in London and Scotland over th last few days. Anyone else hear anything?
"This decision puts the burden back on government to justify
restrictions on free speech, rather than making people like Chris
prove they deserve constitutional protection for their
rights."
Oh Barong,how I wish that were true.
I thought I heard something about some terrorist acts in
London and Scotland over th last few days. Anyone else hear
anything?
You will read about that here when you see a comprehensive story
about that Jim Webb gun fuss in DC here. Well, I have been away for
a while so maybe theyre was a story about the Webb thing a few
months after the fact and I missed it.
Okay, but Jacob, how did you resist the temptation to use the lede "Pagan wins 6th Cir. hearing"?
I thought I heard something about some terrorist acts in
London and Scotland over th last few days. Anyone else hear
anything?
I heard that some clowns (doctors, no less) had built two
non-functioning car bombs (that were little more than propane tanks
and jerry cans of petrol) and drove another car into the front of
an airport terminal. When this didn't do much damage, they set
themselves on fire. These guys were such fuck-ups that they
couldn't even get the suicide part of the suicide attack
right.
If this what constitutes a "critcal" terrorist threat, I think it's
past time to declare victory in the "War on Terror." That, or we
can sit around wetting ourselves over the terrorist menace.
Right, if Reason doesn't cover the UK terror attacks, no one will know about them. (Also, the attacks have been mentioned in a few posts--see the Lieberman post below.)
Does every news outlet have to report every crime that happens all over the world? There is not much significance in that story unless you were directly involved or are a government stooge trying to put more fear into the populace...
seemingly quixotic quest
Huh? It wasn't just 'seemingly', it was a quite quixotic quest. A
queerly quaint quixotic quest, maybe even quietly quotidian. But
way more than seemingly.
OH NOES! SOME GUYS DROVE A CAR INTO A BUILDING! I AM WETTING MYSELF! WITH PH34R! PH34R AND URINE!
It was just a dry run for the...
[cue dastardly evildoer fanfare] Dunh-dunh-duuuuunh!
DIRTYBIOBOMB!
More people were injured as a result of Orson Welles' War of the
Worlds broadcast; that's some hard core terror, baby.
I'm just curious whether his name is Christian or Christoper. Obviously the former is quite a thing.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245