Plus: New details on federal bullying of banks, a new fight over nutrition advice, and new migrant mania from President Trump
His true impact may be less about transforming the Court’s ideology, and more about altering its status in political life.
Opposition to Kavanaugh stems from a case that was decided the year Kavanaugh was born and was argued by professors from the law school from which he graduated.
Clinton runs with a Kamala Harris whopper that's already been debunked.
This time the Libertarian Party seems to be hurting the Democrat, who's trying to run out the clock on confirming Brett Kavanaugh.
"Brett Kavanaugh said he would kill Roe v. Wade last week." Except he didn't.
Harris and other Democrats distorted Kavanaugh's comments on birth control to portray him as a religious extremist.
Fun fact: All laws give government control of the decisions that everybody of any gender can do with their bodies.
Roe v. Wade will be safe with Justice Kavanaugh.
Pro-life and a Democrat? Missouri’s Democratic Party isn't interested.
Had the bill passed, Argentina’s conservative president said he would sign it into law.
They should tread carefully before scrapping reproductive rights now that the possibility of overturning Roe v. Wade is real
They shouldn't rush to scrap reproductive rights
It is both philosophically and strategically wrong.
Cornell law professor Michael Dorf asks whether Clarence Thomas would vote to strike down federal laws restricting abortion, on federalism grounds. The answer might well be yes. But the issue would have to be presented to him in the right way.
Many Democrats have come out against Kavanaugh's nomination, arguing that he'll mean the end of
Roe v. Wade.
Plus, what they might be like in a post-Roe world
Current liberal court-packing proposals are dangerously misguided - and for much the same reasons as last year's conservative court-packing plan.
The Kentucky Republican was asked if Trump should nominate a justice who thinks "an unborn child with a beating heart is a person."