Justice Kagan asked which provision of the INA was violated by DACA
The answer, which the Solicitor General alluded to in his brief, turns on the relationship between the major question doctrine and the nondelegation doctrine
The answer, which the Solicitor General alluded to in his brief, turns on the relationship between the major question doctrine and the nondelegation doctrine
In the circuit courts, DOJ cited the Nielsen memorandum as providing an "independent" basis to rescind DACA
Are the Procedures Fundamentally Unfair?
The Court punted on deferred action in 2016, denied certiorari before judgment in 2018, and may yet again evade a merits ruling in 2019
And does a Vermont statute mandating such sealing apply in cases that are being litigated in federal court?
A column at Politico claims that the Senate can, by simple majority vote, decide on a secret ballot for impeachment -- but I don't think so.
Given the six-month wind-down, the policy would remain intact until after the inauguration.
No, President Trump cannot invoke his Sixth Amendment rights in connection with House impeachment proceedings
The Trump administration's justification for rescinding DACA relies heavily on the claim that the program is illegal. But it's not.
SCOTUS can still uphold the rescission if it agrees that Attorney General reasonably concluded that DACA was unlawful
A happy occasion - but also one with lessons that remain urgent today.
Unfit grandparents, hours at the DMV, a Cheerleading Constitution.
The Attorney General's argument, along the lines of our Cato amicus brief, sounds in the non-delegation and major question doctrine.
Randy Barnett and I will be signing books at the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention
A recently-filed cert petition gives the Court a good opportunity to rule on the constitutional role of presidential electors
"[G]iven the issues surrounding Mr. Liebowitz’s credibility and his failure to provide any information or documentation regarding his grandfather’s death, Mr. Liebowitz’s reiteration could not sufficiently discharge his obligations to the Court."
No, the Small Business Administration has found
The Seventh Circuit's ruling on remedies for Janus violations
While I have long advocated using May 1 for this purpose, November 7 is a worthy alternative candidate, if it can attract a broader consensus.
The Chronicle says that a vote for Corbyn is a vote for racism against Jews
The Kansas Department of Agriculture has agreed that a Kansas statute sharply limiting such advertising violates the First Amendment.
"the majority of parents might be in danger of losing custody of their children." Plus abortion, opposite-sex roommates, "serial cohabitation without benefit of vows," parents' custody rights vis-a-vis nonparents (here grandparents), and more.
A major dissenting opinion by Judge Stras
Conservatives (and others) should pursue alternative approaches to the threat of climate change.
A request under the name of Leonard Pozner -- the plaintiff in that case -- was submitted to Google, asking it to deindex these criticisms (which aren't themselves covered by the judgment).
A quote from my student Jennifer Wilson, who had worked as a reporter for five years before going to law school.
If a DNA site tries to let the public in but keep the police out, can the police override that with a warrant?
Some interesting words from Justice Douglas.
The VanDyke report proves that the ABA cannot be trusted to fairly review nominees.
An interesting analysis, handed down last month
On reasonable suspicion and how to calculate it.
Same for "Islam is right about women" flyer -- both are labeled "hate-filled flyers" by the University, and apparently the police and the FBI are investigating the distribution of the flyers.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks