The Empty Threat of 2Ls and 3Ls Transferring To Receive In-Person Instruction
Students would be foolish to transfer to another school in the middle of a pandemic when there is no guarantee in-person instruction will continue anywhere.
Students would be foolish to transfer to another school in the middle of a pandemic when there is no guarantee in-person instruction will continue anywhere.
Unpaid college athletes, cannabidiol gummies, and jailhouse informants.
Seems right to me, at least as a general matter.
But permanent injunctions after a full trial on the merits might be a different story.
Students who want to be on campus may find the experience very, very different than they expected.
McCulloch v. Maryland, always and forever.
Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland could help decide the Faithless Electors Cases
An abuse of power that doesn't violate federal fraud statutes can still be an impeachable offense - and still violate other criminal law.
Kelly v. U.S. distinguished between property-based fraud and abuse of power
I anticipated this change, which is consistent with Thomas's Murphy v. NCAA concurrence
Yes, it was Judge Reinhardt.
"When the executive branch concedes a ruling that will effectively result in compelled legislative appropriations and court supervision and control of the public-school system, the legislative branch’s exercise of its core appropriation function has been 'completely nullified.'"
No. That phrase came from Judge Pillard's opinion in Priests for Life.
Justice Kagan offers one possible middle ground: "Cover only those who have objections to the existing accommodation."
This issue turns on the arcana of ERISA.
Ginsburg pages, Thomas and Gorsuch delegate, and Alito extends.
The effort was spearheaded by Judges Katsas, Oldham, Pryor, and Thapar.
Why does it matter is a federal agency is independent of Presidential control? Ask the Department of Defense.
An interesting election law (and name law) case from New York.
So a Maryland appellate court held last month, I think quite correctly (and consistently with the broad trend in other states):
Josh Duggar had sued over the government's releasing records of his juvenile investigation.
A fascinating new case.
"As more becomes known about the threat and about the less restrictive, more targeted ways to respond to it, continued burdens on constitutional liberties may not survive judicial scrutiny."
But the nuanced legal position is politically irrelevant.
Epstein's victims ask the full Court to rehear this case, which upholds concealing "secret" non-prosecution agreements from crime victims.
CNN reports that Attorney General Barr is (again) voicing opposition to DOJ's argument that zeroing out the mandate penalty should upend the entire law.
So holds a federal district court.
My article explores how the standard racial category boxes that we are asked to check came to be, and what proof the government requires of belonging to a minority group.
An important First Amendment holding in a factually fascinating case, which involves an alleged breach of contract, a World War II Medal of Honor, a dispute over a history book, and a discussion of anti-libel injunctions.
People interested in government, and in editing, would have surely found it interesting.
I have a new article reviewing the latest developments in the debate among legal historians.