UCLR Online Symposium on Seila Law v. CFPB
A collection of essays analyzing one of the more important administrative law decisions of the October 2019 term.
A collection of essays analyzing one of the more important administrative law decisions of the October 2019 term.
David Cole writes in defense of the National Rifle Association
The SG agrees with the Eighth Circuit and Judge Willett. The Supreme Court may have to decide the vitality of Whole Woman's Health sooner than I expected.
Adam Thierer, author of the lead essay, has a response to his critics.
Now, without the buzzing feedback
"This Essay was inspired by Dave Barry’s satirical year-in-review columns. I hope to make it an annual tradition."
A 2008 brief that she signed (1) argued that a total handgun ban was constitutional, and (2) strongly suggested that the Second Amendment doesn't secure an individual right.
Something as simple as black paint may reduce avian mortalities from wind power.
The Sixth Circuit recognizes that Supreme Court precedent is binding until overruled by the Supreme Court.
And students can easily watch recorded classes even if they are affected by the weather.
Political philosopher Jason Brennan explains why.
As far as I am aware, the Texas SG is the first litigant to seek en banc review of an interim panel order.
Dean Lidsky is a libel law scholar, and one of the two Reporters of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Defamation & Privacy.
competing conclusions of unconstitutionality under two separate constitutional provisions, in two separate jurisdictions.
"Over the course of five hectic days, I would brief and argue four temporary restraining order (TRO) motions in four courts. I prevailed on the first three. The fourth court, alas, issued a global injunction that blocked our settlement. "
The Fourth Circuit decides a case involving defendants who violently participated in two white supremacist rallies in California and in the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, but the logic applies equally to rioters of all stripes.
This semester I am lecturing less and asking far more polling questions.
I figured out the feedback issue. It will be fixed on Wednesday
Bear hunting and social distancing go together, at least in Maine.
Two sets of states, the House of Representatives and Solicitor General all get argument time.
When can libel plaintiffs, suing over allegedly false claims of sexual misconduct, sue pseudonymously? When can defendants defend pseudonymously?
Here's an amicus brief we just filed. It's just like with the Nazis!
Would requiring masks for in-person voting infringe constitutional rights?
A Texas agency could concluded that it is not, says the Texas Court of Appeals.
The New York Times, once very careful about mixing news and opinion, is now an overtly partisan newspaper
This case involved a Colorado Springs abortion clinic, but it could equally apply to synagogues, bookstores selling books with Mohammed cartoons, animal research facilities, etc.
Willett agrees with Justice Kavanaugh, and the Eighth Circuit, in applying the Marks Rule to June Medical.
Moss piglets, Costco at Tiffany’s, and murder-for-hire.
So holds a federal court, quite correctly; of course, the same is true about any religious group, racial group, or other such large group.
An interesting decision in former AP journalist Charles Ganske's lawsuit against former Member of Parliament Louise Mensch, with allegations of Russian bots and Tweeting frenzies thrown in for good measure.
When it comes to the Supreme Court, the answer is clearly "no." Things are less clear when it comes to the lower federal courts.