Tax Plans of Obama, Romney Have Big Implications for State Finances
When the feds sneeze, the states get knocked over
When the feds sneeze, the states get knocked over
Government's attempt to squeeze out charitable contributions and increase Americans' tax burden
A judge called the measure description "incomplete," which is a nice way of saying "misleading"
Tax relief will quietly expire and pick pockets without a fight
The stripper's pole is a slippery slope, or something like that
Watch for a growing definition of "abandoned" accounts in the future
About those underfunded pensions ...
Propositions 30 and 32 too close to call; Prop. 38 trails; Obama leads Romney 53-38 and Feinstein leads Emken 60-34
His plan would cap itemized deductions at $25,000.
The government wants to force the search engine to pay for click-throughs
Yet another explanation why the numbers don't add up
If you make the state unattractive, money will go elsewhere
The next debate should be between Romney and his running mate, about what exactly is in their tax plan.
Criminals will never pay the tax, law-abiding citizens will rarely pay it, and the county will get little revenue.
As it is, it's smarter to keep it overseas
45 percent of taxes are paid by the top ten percent in the U.S., 32 percent elsewhere in the industrialized world
The GOP presidential candidate's tax plan is vague, backward, and possibly impossible.
Americans don't want to see the screws applied to small businesses
It's difficult and expensive for them to comply
Wyoming, South Dakota and Nevada managed to avoid imposing crippling, complicated taxes
The state almost seems to be pushing people out
French socialist government may not have anticipated so many leaving
List of Greeks who are being investigated for corruption and tax evasion was handed to Greece's Prime Minister last week
Those who fret about the cost of a tax cut are looking at the question from the wrong end of the telescope.
Next step, between the cushions, under the sofa ...
Blaming tax cuts for a recession is a contention so ridiculous that even a fake economic study doesn't exist to prove it.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks