US Says There is "No Path Forward" on Syria Through UN Security Council Because of Russia
Veto would block any resolution
Veto would block any resolution
House of Commons voted against the principle of military action against the Assad regime
It's never too early for some political positioning
Report delivered to the U.N.
Shooting cruise missiles at Syria not very popular among Americans
Many lawmakers skeptical about intervention
What the hell are we trying to achieve anyway?
Emails suggested US was involved in chemical attack
Chemical weapons have the public angry, but not enough to commit to military action
The rest are more Obama worshipers than ideologues
Our global standing won't suffer if we refuse to bomb Syria.
If a reactor is hit, for example, says the Russian foreign ministry
Crisis, opportunity
Walking a fine line ahead of next year's election
Also lambasted "one-sided interests"
Defection of fellow Alawite significant
Diplomacy not even an option?
Even if said war turns out to be "World War III"
Make the comment in speech to lawmakers
Obama hoping Congress will pass authorization for use of military force
Kerry told Senate terrorist group was not taking over. Putin disagrees.
Obama trying to get Congress to authorize a military strike
Points out Obama didn't think the president was permitted to carry out a military attack that does not prevent an imminent threat