10 Years After Heller, Does 'Normalizing' the Second Amendment Mean Ignoring It?
The Supreme Court has been almost completely silent on the subject of gun rights, leaving important issues unresolved.
The Supreme Court has been almost completely silent on the subject of gun rights, leaving important issues unresolved.
And yet the Supreme Court is still reluctant to release same-day audio recordings.
Federal court allows a Virginia student's case against school district to continue.
Understanding the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling in Epic Systems Corporation v. Lewis.
Congress can't "commandeer" state legislators, but it can achieve the same result with "preemption."
U.S. politicians prevented the development of a legal market for sports betting, driving eager gamblers to underground bookies.
Fourth Amendment advocates score a limited victory in Byrd v. U.S.
"A more direct affront to state sovereignty is not easy to imagine."
Union-backed report finds unions could be screwed.
There is no reason not to release same-day audio for all oral arguments at the Supreme Court.
Giving the government blanket power to check the Bill of Rights at the border won't serve the interests of citizens or immigrants
If domestic courts are to be a forum for these sorts of suits, five justices conclude, Congress must first say so.
Capsule summary: "Vote the way we want you to, and maybe we'll have just a bit less contempt for you than we now do."
An impressive new movie dramatizes the story behind the famous Supreme Court case about whether it is permissible for the government to condemn homes in order to promote private "economic development."
The two justices face off in Sessions v. Dimaya.
Lawmakers passed a bill requiring American firms to comply with warrants for data stored overseas, ending a legal fight.
The Supreme Court rules against the federal government in Sessions v. Dimaya.
This may be the first time Justice Gorsuch joined the Court's more liberal judges in a 5-4 decision, but it's unlikely to be the last.
UCLA Law Professor Adam Winkler on his new book We the Corporations
SCOTUS encourages excessive force by shielding police from liability.
The story of how the government can take your home against your will.
In recent remarks, the Seventh Circuit judge assessed the newest Justice's early work on the Court.
A few thoughts on today's summary reversal in Kisela v. Hughes.
The retired justice wants to claw back parts of the Bill of Rights.
Computers could be the key to resolving partisan fights over congressional boundaries.
"The President of the United States has no immunity and is 'subject to the laws' for purely private acts."
"Border searches never require a warrant or probable cause."
The black market will continue to thrive if taxes and regulations are too burdensome, a new CEI report warns.
California unions and their allied politicians need to learn to respect the rights of California's government workers.
The Constitution prevents the feds from commandeering state and local officials.
A shameful chapter in U.S. law.
Marking the 54th anniversary of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
Immigration, federalism, and the 10th Amendment
Is this a chance for the Supreme Court to correct its constitutional mistake?
This could result in a ruling overturning a terrible 1985 decision that makes it very difficult to bring takings cases in federal court.
Justice Sotomayor dissents from the denial of certiorari in Wessinger v. Vannoy.
A look into a more restrictionist future for the Second Amendment.
Mandatory fees are an assault on free association.
Indefinite detention carried the day in Jennings v. Rodriguez, but the ruling affirms an important principle that may eventually kill the practice.
The justices have passed up one opportunity after another to clarify the boundaries of the constitutional right to arms.
"It seems to me your argument doesn't have much weight."
He should make a peace offering to Congress now or suffer midterm losses.
On today's podcast: Mona Charen gets booed, the gun control debate reignites, public sector unions suck, and Olympic curling is surprisingly awesome.
Janus v. AFSCME could end mandatory union dues payment. Counter-intuitively, it might strengthen the labor movement.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks