In Rush to Redevelop, a California City Tramples Property Rights
Urban renewal efforts should recognize that existing businesses and new residents can coexist.
Urban renewal efforts should recognize that existing businesses and new residents can coexist.
In practice, these programs have empowered local governments to use eminent domain to seize property to redistribute to developers.
The anti-development crowd has weaponized D.C.'s historic preservation process. A Safeway wants the city to rule that nothing important happened there.
Two unions called out for threats to sue if they don't get hired to build.
NYC's mayor takes on private property (again).
Property owners were ordered to pay thousands for violations unless they agreed to sell to a redeveloper.
De Blasio literally wants to tell people what to do with their land.
Better hope your city doesn't think your property would look better as a Bed, Bath & Beyond
Richmond, Virginia, has already been burned on grandiose projects.
$150 million to finance industrial park that didn't turn out as expected
Mount Holly Gardens tries to get poor minorities out of their homes in the name of redevelopment.
Doomed agencies should sell off their property and disappear.