Nate Silver: Entitlement Programs Drive Growth in Federal Spending
Welcome aboard, Nate
All gone, already, and we haven't even dealt with the debt ceiling
Let's see where it all actually ends up
A pre-packaged bankruptcy that requires state involvement would be politically explosive.
Let's see ... Under the sofa cushions? Check ...
Only in Washington could you get away with referring to both spending hikes and tax hikes as spending "cuts."
The president and his fans say the best is yet to come. That can't be good.
Thomas Jefferson's favorite economist had some harsh things to say about government borrowing
Why are U.S. taxpayers footing the bill for surveillance cameras in Alaska?
Public officials need to consider a wider array of crime-fighting options.
Which is great if you're a politician, but not so good for those paying the bills
State casts about for new stones to get blood from
Congress and the White House do nothing about the ever-expanding federal budget.
Why are taxpayers picking up the tab for Mickey Mouse?
Lawmakers pay lip service to liberty while trampling it under foot.
Or just cave as usual; six of one, half a dozen of the other
2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) comes with a $633 billion price tag
Observers doubt that officials have the backbone, or sanity, to spend less
Would link it to inflation and population growth, Colorado-style
Future unclear amid all the other politicking
Obama and Boehner are both big spenders. That's the problem.
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.