Shooting the Messenger and Blaming the Victim
How cops, politicians, and bureaucrats tried to dodge responsibility in 2024
How cops, politicians, and bureaucrats tried to dodge responsibility in 2024
164 events or speakers were targeted, mostly over the Israel-Palestine conflict.
The government has given itself special powers to deal with crimes that it could already prosecute.
Republicans should not give any more money to the Global Engagement Center.
The president-elect's lawsuit against The Des Moines Register is a patently frivolous and constitutionally dubious attempt to intimidate the press.
Plus: More funding for the "disinformation" censors, more fines for cashless businesses, the link between pandemic shutdowns and murder rates, and more...
The host of This Week repeatedly and inaccurately asserted that Trump had been "found liable for rape."
Lee says this is about "sexual and violent content." It goes far beyond that.
Your donations help us keep the culture of free speech alive.
Trump's pick to run the FBI has a long list of enemies he plans to "come after," with the legal details to be determined later.
A judge says the federal law has no constitutional basis and threatens First and Fourth Amendment rights.
The popular but beleaguered social media app will have until January 19 to find an American buyer or be banned.
"We're gonna come after the people in the media," the Trump stalwart warns. "Whether it's criminally or civilly, we'll figure that out."
Lacey can await the resolution of his appeal outside of prison.
From criminal penalties to bounty hunters, state laws targeting election-related synthetic media raise serious First Amendment concerns.
The company, which says it takes an "apolitical approach" to rating news outlets, faces regulatory threats and a congressional probe because of its perceived bias against conservatives.
A board employee and a local reporter were arrested on the same bogus charge of divulging nonexistent grand jury secrets.
Brendan Carr’s plans for "reining in Big Tech" are a threat to limited government, free speech, free markets, and the rule of law.
"Reining in Big Tech," Brendan Carr says, requires scrapping liability protections and restricting moderation decisions.
Abortion battles are becoming tech policy battles.
The law "is not neutral toward religion," wrote Judge John W. deGravelles, who ruled that the law was "facially unconstitutional."
The Treasury Department tried to stop an overseas conference that included politicians under sanctions. Now they’re backing down.
The justices, including Trump's nominees, have shown they are willing to defy his will when they think the law requires it.
In his second term, the former and future president will have more freedom to follow his worst instincts.
The Republican presidential candidate argues that CBS and The Washington Post broke the law by covering the election in ways he did not like.
After being arrested for doing journalism, Priscilla Villarreal has taken her fight to the courts.
The groups are challenging a Florida law that bans some teens from social media.
By prosecuting the website's founders, the government chilled free speech online and ruined lives.
Regulating AI could threaten free speech, just as earlier proposed regulations of other media once did.
Despite his cluelessness, the former president's inclination to punish constitutionally protected speech reflects his authoritarian disregard for civil liberties.
Sending user manuals, algorithms, and lines of code can be legally equivalent to exporting bombs.
Rebekah Massie's removal and arrest from a city council meeting was "objectively outrageous," the judge ruled.
How the equal time rule is helping him hijack the airwaves.
The state has been demanding that TV stations remove political ads in support of a reproductive freedom amendment on the ballot this year.
The former president's authoritarian tendencies are alarming enough without inventing new outrages.
"Michigan's D.E.I. expansion has coincided with an explosion in campus conflict over race and gender," notes The New York Times.
For more than three decades, the Institute for Justice has shown that economic freedom and private property are essential safeguards for ordinary Americans.
Priscilla Villarreal's case is about whether certain reporters have more robust free speech rights than others.
The good news is that schools won't be forced to stock Trump-endorsed Bibles. The bad news is that they're still being forced to supply Bibles.
Mason Murphy says Officer Michael Schmitt violated his rights by punishing him for constitutionally protected speech.
South Carolina bans all media interviews with incarcerated people, a policy the state's ACLU chapter says is the most restrictive in the country and infringes on its First Amendment rights.
The Florida Department of Health sent a cease and desist order to a Florida news station after it aired an ad claiming that women with cancer would be unable to obtain abortions in the state.
Reason's new documentary is now streaming on the video platform CiVL. I hope you'll watch.
Both presidential candidates (and their running mates) seem confused about the constraints imposed by the First Amendment.
A divided circuit panel stays the district court's injunction against enforcing Ohio's law.
The film ties together years of reporting on a legal saga with broad implications for both free speech and sex work.
Ryan Walters' strict stipulations make it clear he’s steering Oklahoma schools to purchase Donald Trump’s Bibles at a hefty cost.
Her comments are a reminder that this free-speech protection is far from safe.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10