Brendan Carr's 'Equal Time' Threat Against The View Is Blatantly Unconstitutional, ABC Says
The FCC chairman seems determined to impose a requirement that would amount to a ban on interviews with political candidates.
The FCC chairman seems determined to impose a requirement that would amount to a ban on interviews with political candidates.
The defense secretary argues that military retirees like Sen. Mark Kelly are not allowed to say things he unilaterally deems "prejudicial to good order and discipline."
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche implausibly claims prosecutors can prove Comey "knowingly and willfully" threatened to murder the president.
The president is not shy about using government power to punish people for saying things that offend him.
The case defies more than half a century of rulings on the “true threat” exception to the First Amendment.
Plus: The Supreme Court says “demands for a charity’s private member or donor information” raises First Amendment problems.
The Court dispatches with an easy case the lower courts should have gotten right.
When he returned to the White House, Trump vowed to protect free speech from the government. The FCC's latest move against ABC and Disney looks like the opposite.
The feds have been demanding that tech companies identify the administration's anonymous online critics. That violates the First Amendment.
To justify punishing a legislator for his speech, a FIRE brief notes, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth relies on a Supreme Court precedent that is clearly inapposite.
The bureau reportedly investigated the author of a New York Times story that made FBI Director Kash Patel look bad.
Texas might have the right to post the Ten Commandments in public classrooms, but it shouldn't bother.
The platform creators filed a lawsuit claiming their First Amendment rights were violated after the Trump administration convinced Apple and Facebook to remove their content.
The Court's 1963 ruling in Bantam Books v. Sullivan is freshly relevant in light of recent efforts to restrict speech through government intimidation.
The groups and their ideology are awful. But Virginia's policy violates the First Amendment. Allowing it to stand could set a dangerous precedent.
The defense secretary's asserted authority to control the speech of retired military officers "would chill public participation by veterans," a brief supporting Mark Kelly warns.
The Ivy League school released a self-critical report this week.
What is a greater rejection of America's founding ideals than an overreaching government trampling the First Amendment?
Remembering the infuriating case of United States v. “The Spirit of ’76.”
After withdrawing a summons in the face of a legal challenge, the government is seeking a grand jury subpoena.
The poster, which included a rainbow flag, counts as "instruction that includes sexuality content" and triggers an Ohio parents' rights law, the board said.
In the guise of investigating "potentially unlawful advertiser boycotts," the commission is punishing the organization for its views.
Plus: The Alito retirement rumors keep swirling.
Trump's failure to properly allege "actual malice" is consistent with his long history of filing shaky legal claims against people who say things he does not like.
Free speech lawyers say UNC violated North Carolina’s institutional neutrality law.
Tech companies that create social media apps should not be blamed for the complex mental issues of everyone who might use them.
The 18-year-old college freshman had to have his right eye surgically removed after a federal agent allegedly shot him in the head with a less-lethal weapon.
A new Florida law would allow state leaders to designate certain groups as terror organizations.
A recent string of zoning controversies show how land use regulations have become the enemy of all good things.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiles v. Salazar.
Plus: Wisconsin governor vetoes porn age-check bill, more charges for penis protester, the Komodo dragon theory of social media, and more...
A federal judge ruled the Ten Commandments monument at the state Capitol must be removed.
This is how a conspiracy theory grows.
The U.K. said it would stop investigating "legal" social media posts, but free speech advocates demand more change.
The president's predictions of the nation's imminent demise reflect his narcissistic authoritarianism.
Plus: the Facebook verdicts, porn star chatbots, facial recognition gone awry, drag queen regulation, and more…
Judge Rita Lin's preliminary injunction confirms what government officials had implicitly acknowledged: The supply chain risk designation was punishment, not policy.
Plus: Meta and Google found liable, what the verdict means, an OnlyFans-style campaign website, and more...
Despite its rejection of the Biden administration's interference, the Trump administration is still asserting authority over online speech.
Meta's loss in a New Mexico "product design" case could also be a blow against Section 230, free speech, and online privacy.
The justice dissented from the Supreme Court's denial of a petition from a Texas journalist who was charged with felonies for practicing journalism.
The lawsuit alleges that the city has a history of silencing pro-Palestine speech.
"We are not in the mood to discuss the matter further, and have not been in the mood for 250 years."
Ohio sheriff's deputies raided Afroman's house in 2022 based on a bogus tip, then sued the rapper after he released music videos mocking the deputies.
The First Amendment does not allow the FCC chairman to police news coverage.
Eight others were convicted on vague "terrorism" charges—causing serious concern among First Amendment advocates.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks