Phil Magness: The Problem With Trumponomics
Economic historian Phil Magness on the real history of tariffs and why Trump is so wrong about them.
What would a Mar-a-Lago accord look like? Just asking questions.
Phil Magness is an economic historian with the Independent Institute who has deeply studied the history of tariffs and trade. We invited him on the show to talk about the "global economic reordering" described by Donald Trump's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, the president's escalating tariffs, the looming threat of a trade war, the shaky stock market, and the so-called "Mar-a-Lago Accord" that may shed more light on what the Trump administration's economic agenda really is.
Sources Referenced:
- Trump's full speech wherein he floats replacing the income tax with tariffs
- Magness' dissertation: From Tariffs to the Income Tax
- Income Tax: The Root of All Evil, by Frank Chodorov
- U.S. government revenue history with charts
- Just Asking Questions with Tyler Cowen: "Why do we refuse to learn from history?"
- Just Asking Questions with Phil Magness: "Who really pays the most taxes?"
- "Full interview: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Trump's tariffs moves," by CBS
- Just Asking Questions with Kelsey Piper: "The AI Race is Accelerating"
- A User's Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System, by Hudson Bay Capital
- U.S. dollar index chart
- "David Sacks on Bitcoin Reserve, Auditing Crypto, AI," by Bloomberg Technology
Chapters:
- 00:00:00 Coming up…
- 00:00:27 Trump's Confused Tariff History
- 00:06:39 The Dual Purpose of Tariffs
- 00:09:44 Tariffs as Foreign Policy Tools
- 00:11:26 Smoot-Hawley and the Great Depression
- 00:15:38 The Great Forgetting of Trade History
- 00:20:54 National Security Justifications for Tariffs
- 00:25:32 Debating Strategic Industries Like Semiconductors
- 00:30:06 J.D. Vance, Industrial Decline, and Economic Nostalgia
- 00:37:31 Auto Industry, Union Labor, and Protectionism
- 00:40:34 The Mar-A-Lago Accord Explained
- 00:45:58 Should Other Countries Pay for U.S. Security?
- 00:49:33 Can Tariffs Be Effective Negotiation Tools?
- 00:53:37 Will Weakening the Dollar Backfire?
- 00:57:08 Do Tariffs Cause Inflation?
- 01:00:41 The U.S. Government's Bitcoin Sovereign Wealth Fund
- 01:06:59 Final Thoughts and What We Should Be Asking
- Producer: John Osterhoudt
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Can JD Vance be wrong about tariffs too? Please?!?!
Dumb question. JD Vance is wrong about everything. Even things that most mortals can't even imagine. There is literally no limit to the wrongness of JD Vance. He drives the wrong car in the wrong lane on the wrong road. He eats the wrong food with the wrong fork at the wrong dinner party drinking the wrong wine. His wrongness transcends the physical world. Otherworldly creatures place trillion dollar bets on how wrong he will be in alternate universes. Okay I made that up. I don't understand string theory but I'm pretty sure JD Vance is wrong about it. I could go on but mark my words, JD Vance is very very wrong.
Huh, I guess Vietnam dropping their tariffs against us was just a coincidence.
And Pakistan in discussions to do so. Same with india.
What clever takes.
If that's the best criticism you economic geniuses have, it's pretty fair to say your genius is overrated.
Trump appears to be employing two rationals for tariffs: permanent ones intended to on-shore materials and products deemed critical to military security, and reciprocal ones presumably intended to induce the target country to negotiations that lower tariffs on both sides.
The video distinguishes between both and does not argue against reciprocal tariffs, which presumably motivated Vietnam, Pakistan, and India to negotiate. But he does argue against tariffs on alleged military-use materials and products when such tariffs are applied to allies literally on the same continent or same hemisphere.
Trump has already threatened 100% tariffs on semiconductors from Taiwan based on the "security" rationale. This will have huge immediate effect on a broad range of high tech devices. It would take three or more years to build a chip factory in the US. What happens in the mean time?
So Zach and Mutterkreuz Liz managed to find an economist-impersonator with NO CLUE whether confiscatory international drug prohibition--on top of putting Americans on chain-gangs over beer--might have has something to do with the 1929 Crash and worldwide Depression. How... consistent.
That "economist" was a fucking liar. He was too competent to not know he was dodging every sticky question and rolling over a complicit Zach and a complacent Liz.
There is no fentanyl coming across the northern border! Steel isn't a national security threat because we will always be able to get it from the uber-friendly-and-stable countries of Mexico and Brazil! The American security disparity isn't real because Denmark overcontributed once!
I largely disagree with Trump's tariff plan, if there even is one. But when you lie about SOME things, Phil, I'm going to go ahead and assume you're lying about EVERYTHING.
I’ve listened to this guy before. He’s really knowledgeable and informative. Because of this I can say with 100% certainty that no Trump defenders will listen.
Breitbart Business Digest: Why Tariffs Do Not—and Cannot—Cause Inflation
https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2025/03/26/breitbart-business-digest-why-tariffs-do-not-and-cannot-cause-inflation/
THey say you are not just wrong, but totally wrong.
I won't arbitrate this, but you are trotting out Hillary ideas