Anyone remember the Take Care Clause? And way to undermine your SG!
A Real Farewell to SCOTUSBlog?
What do conservatives owe Justice Barrett's supporters?
The FLSA case considers whether to apply the “preponderance of the evidence” standard or the “clear and convincing evidence” standard.
All CivPro students should read these pages.
"These baseless accusations have no merit and repeating them threatens the integrity of the justice system as a whole."
And Smith demonstrates why the Colorado Supreme Court got it wrong.
28 U.S.C. § 1455: "judgment of conviction shall not be entered unless the prosecution is first remanded" to the federal court.
Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett rule against Trump (again).
Back-to-back losses at SCOTUS and the 11th Circuit.
Texas welcomes Chief Justice Jimmy Blacklock and Justice James P. Sullivan
The Judicial Conference will study the issue, but hints the answer is probably no.
Who is defying the Courts?
A federal court ruled that the ERA could not be adopted. Democrat members of Congress told President Biden to adopt it anyway.
What Vance actually said: "I think the thing that you can do in the Senate is push the legal boundaries, as far as the Supreme Court will let you take it."
The 2024 year-end report tells us what keeps the Chief awake at night.
Yes, the Articles of Confederation provided for judges and courts.
It is common enough for the Court to issue administrative stays on the emergency docket to afford itself more time, and maintain the status quo. What about an administrative injunction that would maintain the status quo?
Trump wants to make a deal so SCOTUS doesn't have to.
No "Presumption of Regularity" for Trump 2.0
The opposition is trying to impeach the Acting President for insurrection, who claims he lacks the power to make appointment to constitutional court, which may not have enough members to remove the impeached President.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks