whether at administrators' homes or in law school classrooms.
"What's the most effective way for law students to fight injustice?"
The court reverses a contrary trial court decision.
(as well as other allegations).
The latest video podcast from Prof. Jane Bambauer and me.
The cases on the subject are sharply split, reflecting how ill-defined the law of pseudonymous litigation is.
Did the judge's remarks "suggest[] she had predetermined that the father had no right to oppose gender transition or otherwise direct the child's upbringing based upon his moral and religious beliefs"?
The final article posted from the Knight Institute’s Lies, Free Speech, and the Law symposium.
The eleventh of twelve articles from the Knight Institute’s Lies, Free Speech, and the Law symposium.
The tenth of twelve articles from the Knight Institute’s Lies, Free Speech, and the Law symposium.
The ninth of twelve articles from the Knight Institute’s Lies, Free Speech, and the Law symposium.
The eighth of twelve articles from the Knight Institute’s Lies, Free Speech, and the Law symposium.
The seventh of twelve articles from the Knight Institute’s Lies, Free Speech, and the Law symposium.
Procedure about procedure about procedure.
The sixth of twelve articles from the Knight Institute’s Lies, Free Speech, and the Law symposium.
"To the extent that Kavadia asks the Court to order that public reporting about this case be removed from the Internet, such an order would blatantly violate the First Amendment."
The fifth of twelve articles from the Knight Institute’s Lies, Free Speech, and the Law symposium.
The third of twelve articles from the Knight Institute’s Lies, Free Speech, and the Law symposium.
The third of twelve articles from the Knight Institute’s Lies, Free Speech, and the Law symposium.
But lawsuits for libeling the government do not "have any place in the American system of jurisprudence."
The second of twelve articles from the Knight Institute’s Lies, Free Speech, and the Law symposium.
I'm against it, whomever it's coming from.
What does this bit of legalese mean?
The first of twelve articles from the Knight Institute’s Lies, Free Speech, and the Law symposium.
UPDATE: Sorry, inadvertently scheduled two threads for this morning; please post to the other one instead.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks