U.K. Official Wants You to Stop Sneering at Her for Trying to Destroy Your Privacy
Amber Rudd admits that she doesn't understand encryption while insisting on the need to undermine it.
Amber Rudd admits that she doesn't understand encryption while insisting on the need to undermine it.
What happens when you think privacy and speech are just tools of the enemy
Government authorities refuse to consider uncontrollable, dangerous consequences of breaking data privacy.
A wave of new technologies is making it easier for us all to flip the bird to regulators and prohibitionists.
The British government uses its own intel failures to demand weakening of encryption.
Agency hoards infiltration tools and puts our information at risk of exposure.
When transparency and government corruption can come from the same mechanism.
Working on even stronger tech to protect from snooping.
He talks about data protection, but does he understand it at all?
A call for strong data protection even in the face of law enforcement demands.
A guide to stripping the political outrage out of a national defense and policy issue.
Nestled deep in the Investigatory Powers Bill is the authority to mandate encryption "back doors."
Whistleblower doesn't worry about whether there will be a deal for his return.
New Russian anti-encryption and data retention laws look sadly familiar.
Amid debate over encryption access, feds try to just sneak right through.
Podesta leak acknowledges her 'instincts' are to accept law enforcement's claims on encryption access and surveillance.
Law criminalizes anything done in preparation for attack-including behavior that is normally legal.
Government officials arguing against privacy protections are learning their importance in the most embarrassing ways possible.
Who will actually be defining the agenda, because it won't be these two?
FBI refuses to publicly reveal security vulnerability.
Group lists safeguards governments should follow before hacking citizens.
Two words from a government official to dismiss decades of expertise on encryption.
Would she allow the rest of us to be equally protected?
How an oppressive Middle Eastern country led to everybody's iPhones getting a security update.
A funny thing happened on the way to a post-capitalist, crypto-anarchist utopia.
FBI investigations reveal that encryption is increasingly important, and government officials can't be trusted with a backdoor.
An internal bypass mechanism in the Windows booting process makes it out into 'the wild.'
"In Russia, the legislation is compared to the USA Patriot Act."
The infamous concept of 'balance' rears its head.
Government would be able to demand tech companies provide data access.
Coalition of 25 bipartisan lawmakers organizes against unwarranted surveillance and data collection.
Keep calm and accept 24/7 surveillance.
Demands for encryption back doors removed, sort of.
Terrible Senate bill is poised to go nowhere.
'Let us in, but do a better job at keeping others out!'
Because WhatsApp is so popular, it is a prime target for government data mining-and not just in Brazil.
Unlike passcodes, judges seem willing to force cooperation with authorities for access.
Agency wants to avoid a review process over passing information back to Apple.
The NSA laments what is a positive development for individual privacy and security.
Here's what it looks like when your cybersecurity is not protected.
Sen. Wyden threatens a filibuster to block it.
Make no mistake: the War on Crypto is not primarily about "terrorism" or "fighting crime" or "public safety" at all.
It wouldn't make a 'back door'-it would make a gigantic crater.
Beware assuming this means the administration is pro-encryption.
The two switch sides in the request for access, but the underlying issues are the same.
The fight over government access to your private data will not be ending anytime soon.
The Senate is still interested in legislation that could weaken everybody's security.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks