Has the Imperial Presidency Arrived?
There's little question that Trump is taking the concept of the imperial presidency to its apogee.
There's little question that Trump is taking the concept of the imperial presidency to its apogee.
Federal judges in Washington and Maryland say the president's attack on birthright citizenship flouts the 14th Amendment and 127 years of judicial precedent.
The full transcript shows the president's complaints about the editing of the interview are not just wildly hyperbolic and legally groundless. They are demonstrably false.
The company is worried that the president's complaints about a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris could block a pending merger.
The executive order contradicts the 14th Amendment and 127 years of judicial precedent.
A law passed in 2022 requires the president to give Congress a "substantive rationale" for removing inspectors general. Trump has not done that.
But at least he restored respect for a tariff-loving predecessor by renaming a mountain.
They are allied countries with which the U.S. has a trade deal (a deal negotiated by Trump, no less), but presidential emergency powers are nearly limitless.
We have too much rule by decree by whoever currently holds the office of president and a pen.
Children could be denied citizenship even if their parents are here completely legally.
His last-minute acts of clemency invite Trump and future presidents to shield their underlings from the consequences of committing crimes in office.
Despite some notable wins, the president-elect's overall track record shows he cannot count on a conservative Supreme Court to side with him.
The executive order that the president-elect plans to issue contradicts the historical understanding of the 14th Amendment.
Brendan Carr’s plans for "reining in Big Tech" are a threat to limited government, free speech, free markets, and the rule of law.
The justices, including Trump's nominees, have shown they are willing to defy his will when they think the law requires it.
In his second term, the former and future president will have more freedom to follow his worst instincts.
The Republican presidential candidate’s views do not reflect any unifying principle other than self-interest.
The 2024 Democratic platform devotes five paragraphs to firearm restrictions but does not even allude to the Second Amendment.
Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton bring millenarianism—and messianism—back.
We need not conjure "extreme hypotheticals" to understand the danger posed by an "energetic executive" who feels free to flout the law.
Contrary to progressive criticism, curtailing bureaucratic power is not about protecting "the wealthy and powerful."
The Supreme Court's recent rulings limiting the powers of the administrative state are a blessing for liberals who might not control the White House for much longer.
A watchdog group cites ATF "whistleblowers" who describe a proposed policy that would be plainly inconsistent with federal law.
Should a federal government that is nearly $34 trillion in debt and can't manage basic operations be micromanaging fast-food business purchases?
The Trump administration’s unilateral ban on bump stocks turned owners of those rifle accessories into felons.
The governor's attempt to rule by decree provoked widespread condemnation instead of the applause she was expecting.
New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham thinks violent crime gives her a license to rule by decree.
Politicians are throwing laws at the wall and seeing what sticks.
A group of senators is challenging the conventional interpretation of Article 5's an-attack-on-one-is-an-attack-on-all provision.
Legislators from both parties worry about unilateral power, but they use it when it’s convenient.
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch highlights a vital lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic.
The former president reminds us that claiming unbridled executive power is a bipartisan tendency.
The president wants to redefine federally licensed gun dealers in service of an ineffective anti-crime strategy.
The president and his predecessor both tried to impose gun control by executive fiat.
Like his predecessors, the current president ignores the law when it suits him.
Like other authorizations for the use of military force—or AUMFs—it would be an unnecessary, unwise expansion of executive power.
The decision defends the separation of powers and the rule of law against an attempt to prohibit firearm accessories by administrative fiat.
The justices refuse to vacate the injunction against President Biden's student loan forgiveness policy, but accept certiorari.
A federal appeals court has entered a nationwide injunction pending appeal in Missouri's lawsuit against President Biden's student loan forgiveness policy.
A new proposed regulation may test the limits of the Executive Branch's authority to impose regulatory requirements on federal contractors.
Boeing reports that the two new presidential shuttles its building will now be $2 billion over budget.
The lack of statutory authority is the main issue raised by legal challenges to the plan.
Gov. Jay Inslee says Washington state's COVID-19 emergency will finally come to an end on October 31.
Plus: Spider study sheds light on how misinformation spreads, Airbnb regulation ruled unconstitutional, and more...
It is hard to see how, given the contortions required to deliver the unilateral prohibition that Donald Trump demanded.
Regulators imposed the ban based on a highly implausible and counterintuitive reading of federal law.
Implementing policy is supposed to be difficult given that it could affect millions of people’s lives.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10