Military Action Against Iran Unlikely, But an Option, Says Romney
Keep stirring the pot, Mitt
Keep stirring the pot, Mitt
New series explores our current cultural dichotomy of defiance and authoritarianism.
Even the Pentagon doesn't want them anymore
America's longest-serving Republican congressman turns against Afghanistan
Accuses the government of "concealing the truth" about Islam after his classes were shut down
Original goal: Push back Taliban. New goal: Prepare Afghan military
Matt Welch and Kennedy discuss what's in the new issue of Reason.
The forces apparently anticipate an Israeli strike against Iran
Patrolling side-by-side was getting a bit nerve-wracking, was it?
Are "last gasps" the same as "death throes"?
Gee, what could possibly be causing our troops to drink more than they did in the '90s?
Don't any of these people know there are other choices than the two major parties?
Hundreds of ships, airplane, and other materials would be needed
Democrats have been more rhetorically anti-war than actually so
Points out ending war in Iraq, increasing health care for vets
Rand Paul gets his four paragraphs in, but the Republican Party is still firmly interventionist.
U.S. considers Haqqani network a major destabilizing force.
Say the President is thinking of using Assad's chemical weapons as justification for military intervention
It is estimated that an Israeli attack on Iran would cost $41.4 billion
The latest generation of high-tech Navy ships is too complicated and undermanned
The national convention started Wednesday
Advocates of America-as-world-policeman rarely grasp that their conception of "defense" endangers us by creating new enemies.
The new vehicle could be deployed to Afghanistan in early 2013.
Wrote more than 20 books, including The Face of Battle.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10