Don't Count on Institutions to Stop Trump
Our institutions are strong enough to restrain a president, but they're also strong enough to empower him.
Our institutions are strong enough to restrain a president, but they're also strong enough to empower him.
Both parties agree on more spending and bigger deficits.
Trump wants to outdo the Bastille Day festivities in Paris.
Meanwhile, Trump and congressional Republicans want to remove spending caps for the Defense Department.
Meanwhile, tariffs pile up on products that lots of Americans actually buy.
No, the government shouldn't nationalize our mobile infrastructure.
The administration pushes harsh protectionist measures at the Montreal NAFTA talks.
The Pentagon must give the ACLU an opportunity to contest any proposed transfer before it happens.
Illinois and Texas think biometric identifiers are a lawsuit waiting to happen.
The Jones Act drives up consumer prices by protecting U.S. companies from competition. Guess who insists it must be kept intact?
Pentagon argues it does not need to provide a legal basis for deciding to transfer the unidentified detainee.
The escalating tit-for-tat over trade policy risks an all-out trade war.
The "bloody nose" strategy favored by some in his administration is extraordinarily reckless.
Have you heard about "Meltdown" and "Spectre"? Here's what you need to know.
Some would call it the second coming of Marbury v. Madison.
A backwards, protectionist law mandating an obsolete job has been only slightly relaxed.
Instead of arguing about media coverage and posturing about partisan reactions, maybe focus on sanctions and refugee policy?
A judge suspends oppressive city regulations as too vague, but the fight's probably not over.
The former 1988 Libertarian nominee and 2008 and 2012 Republican candidate for president says Trump is just a temporary setback for the libertarian moment.
A prominent constitutional law scholar highlights the perils of wars waged without congressional authorization - a practice engaged in by Obama and now perpetuated by Trump.
Rhetoric on international relations rarely matches actual U.S. actions.
Daniel Ellsberg on nukes, leaks, and the lost documents he copied along with the Pentagon Papers
An old federal law demolishes the development of some domestic tourism markets.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2004 that Americans get due process when accused of terrorism, and yet...
His policy decisions have so far belied his understanding of the public's foreign policy frustration.
Protectionism at play? Politicians say food trucks are "unfair competition" for restaurants.
*Not including the cost of ongoing conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Niger...or the $4.8 trillion debt already accumulated from the post-9/11 wars.
This federal law is about punishing the speech of political enemies, not protecting sensitive international negotiations.
The Senate would lose an authoritarian who wants to crack down on immigrants and fight the drug war. But he's also a hawk in favor of foreign interventions.
Diplomacy and dialogue are more fruitful than containment and condemnation.
Another possible standoff where officials want to compromise everybody's data security.
A preemptive ban risks being a tragic moral failure rather than an ethical triumph.
Without American participation, everyone could end up worse off-particularly Americans.
Protectionist measures hurt American workers and consumers.
What does Trump have to do to get the failing Afghanistan war into the news cycle?
The Trump administration pushes back on the idea of a new AUMF; Congress should push harder.
Many Americans, including our nation's leaders, don't know where or why our military is deployed.
Hurricane Irma sheds light on the hidden costs of yet another protectionist measure.
A report says the Trump administration is on the verge of sending arms to Ukraine. That's a terrible idea.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks