Final 40 Hours of Reason's Annual Fundraising Webathon Gets One Last $25,000 Matching Grant!
Double your giving pleasure NOW to keep the libertarian flagship libertarian.
Double your giving pleasure NOW to keep the libertarian flagship libertarian.
And now we're announcing a new $30,000 match!
The Office spin-off contrasts journalists' self-image as a pillar of democracy with what the job often entails.
Make your tax-deductible gift to Reason's annual webathon today! Starting NOW, your next $50,000 are matched!
Reason Roundup newsletter writer and associate editor Liz Wolfe goes live with Reason’s writers and producers to give you an exclusive look at what’s coming next from our newsroom.
The National Review founder's flexible approach to politics defined conservatism as we know it.
The president thinks TV networks have a legal obligation to cover him the way he prefers. The FCC's chairman seems to agree.
The Washington Post opinion editor Adam O’Neal outlines his vision for a more classically liberal editorial voice, examines how both parties turned against free speech and free markets, and explains why the paper is ending political endorsements.
A magistrate judge says the government’s missteps may warrant dismissal of the charges against the former FBI director.
On Thursday, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit that echoed Donald Trump's claims against the Des Moines Register and pollster Ann Selzer.
The government posits that the former FBI director tried to conceal his interactions with a friend who was publicly described as "a longtime confidant" and an "unofficial media surrogate."
Jake Tapper examines the growing pressure on the news media to serve political interests, Donald Trump’s attacks on the press and peaceful protesters, as well as the lasting damage Joe Biden may have done to the Democratic Party.
The military establishment’s efforts to quash leaks could encourage them instead.
The default in mainstream media isn't no opinion, it's his opinion.
The arrest comes less than a day after a federal judge ordered federal law enforcement to stop impeding reporters and protesters.
The president claims The Wall Street Journal inflicted "billions of dollars" in reputational damage by confirming a well-established relationship.
The same newspaper notes that the killer "obtained a firearm legally," which means he was never "committed" to a mental health institution.
Kathy Hochul's focus on "assault weapons" is puzzling, since the perpetrator easily could have killed the same number of people with a gun that did not fall into that politically defined category.
As a minority FCC member during the Bush administration, Carr condemned government interference with newsroom decisions.
Chairman Brendan Carr thinks his agency should strive to ensure that news coverage is fair and balanced—a role precluded by the First Amendment.
A Lancet study’s inflated numbers are being used to push a partisan narrative, not inform public policy.
Whatever the merits of this particular defamation claim, the president has a long history of abusing the legal system to punish constitutionally protected speech.
The success of "contingency management" belies the notion that addiction is an uncontrollable disease caused by a drug's impact on dopamine levels.
The notion that NPR can somehow become unbiased is about as believable as the IRS sending you a fruit basket to commend you for filing your taxes.
The prosecution, the latest example of local attempts to criminalize news reporting, is blatantly at odds with First Amendment principles.
There's no evidence that cuts to the National Weather Service impacted the response to the weekend's tragic flash floods.
The company's surrender to Trump's extortion vindicates his strategy of using frivolous litigation and his presidential powers to punish constitutionally protected speech.
The Justice Department cannot constitutionally prosecute a news outlet for covering the news.
First-place finishes include a piece on the Dutch "dropping" rite of passage, a documentary exploring citizen journalism and free speech, and a long-form interview with exoneree Amanda Knox.
Deportation means expelling an alien back to their home country for violating immigration law. Many of the Trump administration's actions don't meet that definition.
The California senator was trying to ask about immigration enforcement when federal agents handcuffed and ejected him.
Even if the president was joking in both cases, he already has used his powers to punish people whose views offend him.
Even readers who are profoundly distrustful of Jake Tapper should pick up a copy.
The president has launched a multifaceted crusade against speech that offends him.
The president's lawyers also conflate fraud with defamation, misconstrue the commercial speech doctrine, and assert that false speech is not constitutionally protected.
Even if Laredo cops punished Priscilla Villarreal for constitutionally protected speech, the appeals court says, they would be protected by qualified immunity.
Brown is violating its code of conduct, which guarantees community members’ right to petition the university.
The president is arguing in court that journalism he doesn't like is "election interference" that constitutes consumer fraud.
With the controversy over the leaked White House group chat, mainstream media have been treating secrecy as a virtue and disclosure as a vice. That’s a dangerous game.
The White House accidentally leaked military plans in Yemen to a journalist—and demonstrated how unconstitutional U.S. war making has become.
The commission’s partisan “news distortion” probe is trampling the First Amendment to pressure the press.
The president campaigned on a promise to defend the First Amendment, but he's now attacking free speech through a variety of disreputable strategies.
The president's portrayal of journalism he does not like as consumer fraud is legally frivolous and blatantly unconstitutional.
Margaret Brennan should immediately Google the Weimar Fallacy.
Misinformation concept creep is getting out of hand.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks