The restriction was unconstitutionally content-based, the Eighth Circuit held, because it has an exception for flags "containing distinctive colors, patterns or symbols used as a symbol of a government or institution."
A debate over recognizing a pro-Israel student group reveals ignorance and antisemitism among Williams' students
Trumps two High Court nominees are jurisprudentially independent of one another.
Thoughts on a debate that will be held at the ALI Annual Meeting.
Episode 263 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
Drug traffickers' idol, a voice from the grave, and all decent people.
The US role in the ongoing war in Yemen violates the War Powers Act. Reasserting Congressional power here is vital to the more general purpose of ensuring legislative control over the initiation of war.
A new decision on sovereign immunity, and what it means for originalists.
From today's opinion by Justice Thomas, for the five more conservative members of the Court, in Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt.
So holds a Louisiana Court of Appeal decision from last week.
An article by Stanford Prof. Michael McConnell.
The case showcases a laundry list of problematic behaviors on the part of the government
How could Barr have allowed Deputy AG Rosenstein to participate in evaluating an obstruction-of-justice case against the President when Rosenstein was a key participant in the possibly obstructive events, and would be a witness if a charge were brought?
Invading agricultural land, re-plowing the CFPB's structure, and solitary confinement.
In contrast, police killed nearly 1,000 people last year.
Episode 262 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
I e-mailed the restaurant management when I saw it several months ago; they apologized, and I haven't seen the problem recur.
The Punisher, compelled self-incrimination, and a unicorn amongst unicorns.
Facebook bans Farrakhan, Yiannopoulos, and others, and come watch me talk about hate speech on social media at NYU
Short answer: no, not even close
Stanford may be about to seriously damage one of the world's leading academic publishers, for what seem like very small budgetary savings.
The Ninth Circuit orders briefing on whether one national injunction moots another
And yet despite the split, I doubt that the Supreme Court would agree to take the case.
"Domingo discussed with the [confidential informant] different targets for an attack, including Jews, police officers, churches, and a military facility."
A major environmental case might settle before the Supreme Court has the chance to review it.
Over 23 years ago Missouri’s criminal justice system failed a man charged with murder. This week he’s looking at his last best chance at freedom.
"The black tide of psychosis and the red tide of violence are rising together on a green wave."
New Jersey is detaining almost half as many people pretrial, and the state is not seeing a big crime wave.
Yujing Zhang, Cindy Yang, and prostitution busts at Chinese spas have planted the seeds for new conspiratorial corruption narratives to bloom.
It wasn't about what was fair, it wasn't about what was honest, it was about winning.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks