Ninth Circuit Affirms Anti-Libel Injunction, Rejects Overbroad Portion
The opinion, though, is not binding precedent, so the question whether anti-libel injunctions are unconstitutional prior restraints remains not fully settled.
The opinion, though, is not binding precedent, so the question whether anti-libel injunctions are unconstitutional prior restraints remains not fully settled.
The Supreme Court now has before it a case in which some very important copyright principles are at stake.
In the second of two posts on Tyler Cowen's idea, I assess whether state capacity libertarianism is the right path for libertarians to follow.
If you're looking for an accurate (let alone fair-minded) assessment of judicial records, Slate's not the place for you.
An unvaccinated firefighter, HIV-positive airmen, and a racist lawyer.
A federal appeals court rejects an expansive reading of the federal arson law.
Is "state capacity libertarianism" really where "smart" libertarians are headed? I am skeptical.
Episode 295 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
Courts struck down Marsy’s Law last year. Lawmakers want to bring it back.
Is the Rule of Law a Law of Rules or a Law of Law? Some conservatives seem to prefer the former. Should they?
Confederate monuments, bird handling, and tied houses.
No, yes, then no again said the State of Washington, ultimately upheld by the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
A change to state law keeps it from applying to the plaintiff, which makes the request for injunctive and declaratory relief moot.
A Public Service Announcement, especially for the lawyers among our readers.
Sen. Hawley's resolution resembles a hypothetical rule I proposed last month, which I think is constitutional
Julian Davis Mortenson and Nick Bagley say "no." Ilan Wurman responds, "not so fast."
Plus: the never-quite-there Klobuchar Moment, how Fox News learned to love the deep state, and more...
"Every lawyer has a professional duty to undertake affirmative steps to remedy de facto and de jure discrimination, eliminate bias, and promote equality, diversity and inclusion in the legal profession"
Less dependence on bail and stronger requirements for evidence sharing will help defendants fight charges.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks