The Scripted Impeachment Proceedings
Everything is rehearsed, including how "how to swiftly dispatch with parliamentary disruptions from Republicans"
Everything is rehearsed, including how "how to swiftly dispatch with parliamentary disruptions from Republicans"
Loving v. Virginia did not "strike down" Virginia's ban on interracial marriage
Homeless sweeps, flirty fun, and a DeLorean dustup.
Where one public official act is traded for another public official act, there has not been any illegal conduct.
Banzai! Can surface rights owners control the rights of those who own the mineral rights underneath? In this case, yes.
"It's all over Facebook."
I need to send this brief to the printer tomorrow, but I'd love to have any feedback today on how it can be improved or corrected.
as a condition of having his criminal contempt sentence suspended. OK, says a North Carolina Court of Appeals opinion, though one judge dissents.
"Postpositive," not posterior.
The Court will likely dismiss the case as moot. But how? Through a quick, unsigned DIG? Or through a signed, divided opinion in June?
Episode 290 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
(The quote is from October Man, a splendid fantasy novella by Ben Aaronovitch, but it seemed so appropriate here.)
A pizza shop vandal, FOIA/RICO/1A, and the Case of the Polite Bank Robber.
In theory, at least, the House could continue to investigate possible impeachment proceedings indefinitely, even after an acquittal
This isn't a Thanksgiving post, but about those other conflicts-of-interest the President seems to have.
An interesting federal government argument, in a case pending in D.C. (U.S. v. Calloway).
The remedies casebook with a systematic presentation of equity
Is Justice Gorsuch going to vote with Justice Kagan?
Walter Nixon v. U.S. left open whether this question, which is not "weird," was justiciable
The DACA cases squarely present the question of whether Congress delegated the authority to resolve such a major question about immigration policy
An interesting New York constitutional interpretation case, involving a state constitutional right to collective bargaining.
In the short-term, lawyers on the bar line should receive numbered, reserved tickets. In the long-term, the Court should create a lottery for the bar line.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10