D.C. Circuit Rejects Trump Reforms of EPA Science Advisory Committees
Another big legal victory for environmental groups this week.
Another big legal victory for environmental groups this week.
This case could head to the Texas Supreme Court soon
Will the 6th Circuit vacate take the case en banc sua sponte?
Linda Greenhouse speculates that Gorsuch's dissent became the majority opinion
Environmental groups were worried the Court would curtail CWA jurisdiction in Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. It didn't.
Miami’s police chief orders officers to reduce ticketing and public interactions. Mayhem doesn’t ensue.
How often does the SG dismiss an indictment while a cert petition is pending, without a confession of error? And is there a connection to the Obamacare case?
Thanks for Marcia Coyle for tracking down the Solicitor General's confession of error, which was not publicly available
My law school is. Anyone else?
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court weighs in.
On due process and citizenship litigation
Gems from Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Christian
Ramos was not nearly as fractured as Apodaca, but the Court is still splintered on the value of precedent
All three of today's Supreme Court decisions featured unusual alignments among the justices.
Hair microscopy, an economist breaks bad, and the non-prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein.
"but then you probably are making a judgment call that you need to let a judge make"—reasoning from a New Mexico trial court judge, recently reversed by an appellate court.
Trump is a master of instantly changing the narrative so we forget about yesterday.
Congratulations to the top 8 teams
No President has ever adjourned Congress before. Yet at least.
The Supreme Court should permanently exempt cert-stage briefs from the Byzantine printing and paper requirements of Rule 33.1
Probably. And they certainly should.
See below for posts about other parts of this interesting and important opinion.
"It is remarkable how many ATTORNEYS appear inappropriately on camera."
Recent controversies over election rules and the coronavirus threat have bolstered advocates of decision-making by randomly selected groups of voters. But this approach still has serious flaws.
While calling the secret non-prosecution agreement of Epstein a "national disgrace," the Eleventh Circuit holds that the CVRA only extends victims' rights after an indictment. We will ask for rehearing en banc.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks