The US-China Tech Divide – Where Will it End?
Episode 330 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
Noah Feldman explains why liberals should want someone like Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court
"In NFIB v. Sebelius, the inspiration for Barnett’s book, Chief Justice Roberts pushed the Affordable Care Act beyond its plausible meaning to save the statute."
Excessive traffic and pedestrian stops, especially in black communities, are dangerous and counterproductive.
If reports are accurate, Justice Amy Coney Barrett may be the final 9th Justice
Still more on this interesting decision (and one that takes a much less government-friendly approach than many other recent decisions on these general topics).
More on this interesting decision (and one that takes a much less government-friendly approach than many other recent decisions on these general topics).
The distinction between "political messages" and other messages isn't "capable of reasoned application," holds the Third Circuit.
This year's annual confab is remote, but will still feature the annual B. Kenneth Simon Lecture and release of the Cato Supreme Court Review.
Houston prohibits zoning. But Houston permits a "Historic Preservation Ordinance."
This case may be headed to the Supreme Court.
Chief Judge Pryor "write[s] separately to explain a difficult truth about the nature of the judicial role."
Voter fraud, Jersey Boys, and inescapable tax debt.
He follows Justice Thomas's dissent from Garza v. Idaho: "Where precedent is seriously questioned 'as an original matter' or under current Supreme Court doctrine, courts 'should tread carefully before extending' it."
"We hold that the constitution requires the Governor immediately to appoint and commission a constitutionally eligible nominee from among the seven remaining candidates already certified by the judicial nominating commission."
The Disciplinary Committee will consider ABA Model Rule 8.4(g), as well as revisions to an old Texas Rule
Did the Supreme Court quietly modify a major jurisdictional doctrine?
NFIB v. Sebelius, Chain of Title, and Recording Acts
At this point, what difference does it make?
The Case Western Reserve Law Review has published Judge Barrett's 2019 Sumner Canary Memorial Lecture
An overlooked part of United States v. Moalin could have a major impact on surveillance law.
"The order would abrogate the right to access the courts, violate limits on the Supremacy Clause, implicate the nondelegation doctrine, and traduce anti-commandeering principles."
We need FISA reforms that protect against partisan misuse of intelligence
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10