Do You Have a Right To Run Subway Ads Criticizing High Subway Fares?
A rider advocacy group says the Montreal's transit agency violated its free speech rights by refusing to run ads critical of recent fare hikes.
A rider advocacy group says the Montreal's transit agency violated its free speech rights by refusing to run ads critical of recent fare hikes.
Plus: Arizona prisons censor The Nation, Facebook's feed changes, and more...
"[W]e apply the strongest presumption of public access to the Memorandum Opinion issued by this Court ..., which, as an official decision of the Court, is considered the 'quintessential business of the public's institutions,' and is 'core to the transparency of the court's decisionmaking process.''"
A potentially very important 2-1 decision today from the Minnesota Court of Appeals, which held that such a #MeToo post wasn’t on a “matter of public concern,” and was thus less protected by the First Amendment.
The Florida "Marsy's Law," which protects crime victims, doesn't affect the analysis, even if police officers are treated as victims of the person they shot (who they say was threatening them with a knife).
Leviathan was a challenge to the governing independence of the Holy See.
Where there's demand for books, the internet will supply them.
Both laws seek to evade judicial review by delegating enforcement exclusively to private parties.
Good news for fans of literacy and opponents of restrictive zoning codes
Ruling against town of Superior's law is the first post-Bruen decision on arms bans
so viewpoint-based blocking of commenters doesn't violate the First Amendment.
"There is no question that inaccurate statements were made by the government as part of these proceedings—to both Judge Schroeder and the undersigned"—but it appears that the details of this alleged misconduct remain sealed.
It's none of their business.
"We hear you and we are sorry."
"The kind of values I've always embraced are heard more on Fox than on CNN and MSNBC, where they're not welcome."
The terrible consequences of A.B. 5 keep coming.
For the officer's excessive force, the protester was later awarded a $175,000 settlement over the 2016 incident.
"They don't want the defendant to tell this side of the story," says Clark Neily of the Cato Institute.
Though book banners may try to convince otherwise, students don't need protection from the passion portrayed in Shakespeare's classic.
Judge Jones makes an interesting and compelling argument that in situations where it is debatable whether an officer followed Miranda, there is no good reason for suppressing an unwarned voluntary statement.
The claims come in a lawsuit against Prince George's County (Md.).
''The kind of values I've always embraced are heard more on Fox than on CNN and MSNBC," says the Pulitzer Prize–winning progressive journalist.
That new crime, which is punishable by up to 15 years in federal prison, includes receipt of firearms by "prohibited persons."
Bitcoin's creator designed it to be radically transparent, but the tools exist to make it as hard to trace as cash.
Plus: The emptiness of "national conservatism," anti-tech antitrust antics, and more...
Among other things, "A jury could reasonably conclude that, before making so weighty an accusation as rape based on nothing more than hearsay evidence, the prudent person would, at a minimum, want to hear the other person's side of the story."
Taking personal responsibility turns out to be a better idea than putting faith in the state.
The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act increases the penalties for violating arbitrary firearm bans.
"There's currently no way for me to even know where that buffer zone is."
Republican voters disagree.
The feds now admit there was "no need" for such a thing.
We can condemn the actions of Moscow without forfeiting the right to point out missteps in Kyiv.
Plus: The Respect for Marriage Act, the Farm Workforce Modernization Act, and more...
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.