No-Contact Order Against Law Students (and Professor) Based on Conversation About Homosexuality and Bible …
likely unconstitutional, holds a federal district court.
likely unconstitutional, holds a federal district court.
The Reason senior editor and co-founder of the libertarian feminist group Feminists for Liberty examines a murky post-Roe future.
Several state supreme courts already have recognized the right to terminate a pregnancy. Will more states join the list?
Democrats aren't really this short-sighted, are they?
The late standup comedian's FBI file says he "ridiculed the FBI, law enforcement, and high public officials, beyond the bounds of good humor."
El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Poland offer a window into a post-Roe world.
The principle has implications that go far beyond abortion. Some of them deserve far more attention than they have gotten to this point.
A pro-life group's model legislation hints at how extreme enforcing abortion bans could get.
Plus: America's falling murder clearance rate, the Fed wrestles with inflation, and more...
The leading libertarian legal theorist talks about worrying trends at the Supreme Court as a conservative majority takes hold.
Brian Doherty's history of underground comix chronicles how Robert Crumb, Art Spiegelman, and others challenged censorship and increased free speech.
The former president's recklessness is beyond dispute, but that is not enough to convict him while respecting the First Amendment.
Understanding what Justice Alito got wrong in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Alabama's attorney general argues such medical transitioning is not rooted in America’s history and therefore not constitutionally protected.
The FDA could work with the Department of Justice to sue states over mifepristone bans. But should it?
Grappling with surveillance implications of Roe being overturned
National legislation and extraterritorial application of state laws are inconsistent with the local leeway that the Constitution protects.
so the District Court can reconsider it in light of the Supreme Court's new Bruen precedent.
There is demand for child tax credits, paid family leave, and funding for crisis pregnancy centers but the Rubio-Romney plan is not the answer.
Anti-discrimination law was pioneered by the political left. But, in recent years, conservatives have increasingly tried to use it for their own purposes.
California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, or D.C.?
I lost my motion opposing pseudonymity in the District of New Hampshire, though I'm appealing to the First Circuit.
The Sixth Circuit disagrees with the Second Circuit in the @RealDonaldTrump case (but maybe not by much).
The Virginia governor's proposed 15-week ban shows what a moderate approach to abortion looks like.
Plus: stereotypes within libertarianism, and Katherine compares the editors to Buffy the Vampire Slayer characters.
IVF at "significant risk"
A 6–3 majority sees it as noncoercive and not a violation of the Establishment Clause.
The Supreme Court may have overturned Roe v. Wade, but it has not ended legal battles over abortion.
Justice Thomas reiterates his desire to revisit the contours of defamation law and New York Times v. Sullivan.
Plus: What overturning Roe means for Republicans' future, court halts ban of Juul products, and more...
There’s no painless way to restrict choices for people who resist.
Although the chief justice's incrementalism did not sway his colleagues, his observations about the meaning of a "right to choose" could be relevant in state legislatures.
Liberals won't reconcile themselves to Dobbs, any more than conservatives accepted Roe v. Wade and Casey.
The California AG endorses denying licenses based on the applicant's "hatred" or "racism."
In his Dobbs concurrence, the senior associate justice reiterates his outlying views on precedent and his belief that all substantive due process decisions were "demonstrably erroneous."
Both majority and dissenting opinions include extensive discussions of stare decisis. But the truth is whether you think Roe v. Wade should have been preserved on that basis is heavily correlated with whether you think it was wrong in the first place.
If life begins at conception, there are virtually no limits on government surveillance of women in a post-Roe world.
A weird, messy protest reflects a weird, messy future.